Paul Maisano Designs
DRN Title Search
Register
Log In
Forget your Password?

Home
Directory
Bulletins
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Links
Classifieds
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
FAQ
Privacy Policy


CHARLENE PERRY's Blog

Fannie and Freddie and unpaid transfer taxes
by CHARLENE PERRY | 2012/04/18 |

A recent article shared here on SOT and reported in The Berkshire Eagle relating to the payment of transfer taxes and stamps paid to the Clerks of the Courts by Fannie and Freddie on conveyance deeds got me to thinking......

CHARLENE PERRY's Blog ::

The Fannie Mae Real Estate Purchase Addendum  has a specific parargaph Section 10 (c) wherein they claim an exemption under Title 12 for the payment of transfer taxes.

Prior to February 2010 that particular paragraph was interpreted to mean that if the transfer taxes were collectable (exemption not recognized by the jurisdiction) then the buyer would be responsible for the payment of these fees as part of their closing costs.  Many jurisdictions, including some in Maryland, have never recognized this exemption.  As a result of that interpretation many consumers have paid over to the Clerks of the Court many thousands of dollars that perhaps should have been paid by Fannie and Freddie.

In January, 2010 Fannie started using a revised Real Estate Purchase Addendum and in February, 2010 they issued an explanatory document relating to that new addednum.  A review of that document specifically as it relates to Section 10(c) says that the seller (Fannie Mae) will pay their portion of those fees IF it is usual and customary for a seller to pay and IF the exemption is not recognized.  So, beginning in February, 2010 we have been able to "split" those fees in Maryland between seller and buyer. 

So, then the question that comes to my mind is this;  If it is determined, either jurisdictionally or nationally, that Fannie and Freddie were erroneously claiming an exemption and if, as a result of that error, consumers were made to pay monies on behalf of Fannie and/or Freddie  does the consumer have a right to persue repayment of those monies from Fannie or Freddie?

I wonder how many other states are looking at this exact same issue in an effort to get more funds into their budgets? In the Berkshire article it states that the losses to the Southern Essex Registry alone could amount to 4.2 million dollars owed for fees not paid.  

One can only wonder how much money was paid over nation wide by consumers on behalf of Fannie and Freddie in those jurisdictions where the exemption was not recognized.

I don't think it would be unreasonable to expect class action suits against Fannie and Freddie by consumers for the reimbursement of these fees.

 




Rating: 

555 words | 1435 views | 3 comments | log in or register to post a comment


My Opinion: The GSE's should be exempt.

I wrote a blog about this in December 2008, after the Ohio Department of Taxation issued a memo indicating that Fannie and Freddie are not exempt from conveyance fees.  I thought at the time that the decision was wrong, and I still do.

See:  Public or Private: Is Fannie Mae Exempt from Convenance Fees?

This is an interesting issue that is certainly going to cause a lot of problems down the road.  It will be interesting to see how it is finally resolved.

 

 
by Robert Franco | 2012/04/18 | log in or register to post a reply

Fannie back case -beware of details
Just as a side point, I used to do the updates for Fannie for their outsales  on Norther Va cases. , they would send me the back work used for the foreclsure and it was rookie at the least- never more than a one owner done- so just a nor=te to wacth out for the substandard  work they employ for the foreclosures,
Steve Meinecke
 
by STEVE MEINECKE | 2012/04/23 | log in or register to post a reply

You are so right Steve
As an REO title specialist and having been a Fannie Mae closing agent for more than 10 years I can tell you that the foreclosure firms never do more than a 2 owner search, and that's if you're lucky.  I have spent countless hours clearing title that should have been cleared in advance of the foreclosure.  Buyer beware has never been more appropriate.    
by CHARLENE PERRY | 2012/04/24 | log in or register to post a reply
CHARLENE PERRY's Blog

 

Links

Recent Comments

This is useful blog and helpful. Wish this could help me improve my confidence in doing online disse...
by aara smith
I haven't had time to read the whole opinion, but I think this is a trend.  I did some research...
by Robert Franco
I saw this just now.  Any further developments since August?  I got a great laugh from thi...
by S F Sandquist
Well, I'm sorry if I couldn't contribute to the answer to your intial querry.  I did try!  ...
by john gault
John, You bring up a good point relating to authority. Of course, we always request the neces...
by CHARLENE PERRY
Frankly, Charlene, this befuddles me.  From the info here, I see no indication of the managemen...
by john gault
it's almost impossible to answer this question without seeing  the 50 page agreement. &nbs...
by john gault
I wonder, though, how does one go about making the guarantor pay those taxes?  It doesn't ...
by Robert Franco
Categories

     
    © 2007, Source of Title.