Carteret Title
DRN Title Search
Register
Log In
Forget your Password?

Home
Directory
Bulletins
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Links
Classifieds
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
FAQ
Privacy Policy


CHARLENE PERRY's Blog

Title Industry tasked with identifying money launderers
by CHARLENE PERRY | 2016/01/14 |

It was with interest that I read this report today that adds just one more thing to the list of things we title agents are/may be tasked with having to do for the Government. 

 

http://thelegaldescription.com/TLD/ArticlesTLD/Title-industry-tasked-with-identifying-money-laund-65807.aspx?utm_source=vwTLDget&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=TLD_Thurs_Enews

CHARLENE PERRY's Blog ::

From The Blotter, Wednesday, January 13, 2016 we learn that the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has issued Geographic Tracking Orders (GTO's) that will temporarily require certain U.S. title insurance companies to identify the natural persons behind companies used to pay "all cash" for high-end residential real estate in the Borough of Manhattan in New York City, N.Y. and Miami-Dade County in FL.

 

Luckily I am in Maryland and so far am not tasked with identifying or reporting who the true "beneficial owner" is behind a legal entity involved in "all cash" transactions, but my fear is that this is probably just a test in these states and this will become a nationwide requirement. 

While we understand the importance of combating money laundering in the real estate sector, it's just one more thing that we as title agents are being asked to do, adding more time and costing more money for each transaction.   As it is we are made to report to our State government the sale of the real estate, the Federal government for the sale of the real estate as well as collecting, in some instances, withholding taxes for our State on the sale of the real estate. 

According to the article, "FinCEN is covering certain title insurance companies because title insurance is a common feature in the vast majority of real estate transactions". 

It will be interesting to see how this plays out in the coming months.  For now, this is a "temporary order" becoming effective as of March 1 and running 180 days; expiring on August 27. 





Rating: 

454 words | 3858 views | 0 comments | log in or register to post a comment

CHARLENE PERRY's Blog

 

Links

Recent Comments

So you think that searchers should use secure emails?  Even though our information is all publi...
by Thomas Rance
I think that to be safe, you should use secure e-mail. Consider the information that many title rep...
by CHARLENE PERRY
Hi I want to ask if the rule about having a secured email to send and receive information does...
by latichia lee
Bob, you are not required to sign any such agreement.  And your client isn't required to send ...
by Patrick Scott
I am an Independent Abstractor. I only do searches of public records. I do not do closings or keep ...
by Robert Newton
I don't blame them for trying to collect, but that is one of the reasons that one incorporates, as a...
by Teresa Wright
This is very common for Notary Signing Agents.  Vendors are requiring the NSAs to purchas...
by Bobbi Shorthouse, Notary Public
No, I have never heard of anything like this, nor would I ever participate. It sounds like the "thir...
by Alexis Frey
Categories

     
    © 2007, Source of Title.