AbstractorPro (Real Title Services)
Register
Log In
Forget your Password?

Home
Directory
Bulletins
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Links
Classifieds
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
FAQ
Privacy Policy


Another County Recorder Seeks Back Fees from MERS
press release
   

Guilford County Register of Deeds Jeff Thigpen announced yesterday that he will be conferring with County Attorney Mark Payne, NC Attorney General and Secretary of State as to whether the Mortgage Electronic Registration Service (MERS) owes Guilford County fees estimated at $1.3 million in lost revenue from mortgage assignments. Thigpen also wants to review pending legal actions against MERS and consider options to protect the integrity of public land recordation offices.

“As Register of Deeds, I have two primary responsibilities in land records: a sworn duty to protect the chain of title and a fiduciary responsibility to collect recording fees. Quite frankly, MERS has undermined both. Through their own “private for-profit” Register of Deeds mortgage tracking office, MERS has created a dangerous centralization of power whose sole purpose is to protect and serve the interests of major banking conglomerates and undermine public recording offices,” said Thigpen.

“For me, the question is clear. Do we want land records in America to be governed by major banking conglomerates on Wall Street or the people and laws of the United States of America?”

MERS has an electronic registry and database system that tracks more than 65 million mortgages for its paid membership throughout the country and aides the mortgage backed securities trade in the secondary market. MERS is reportedly involved in 60% of US mortgage loans. It was established by some of the largest mortgage lenders in the United States including Wells Fargo, Chase Mortgage, Citi Mortgage, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and Bank of America among others in 1997. A number of class action lawsuits and civil racketeering suits have arisen against MERS recently, including a suit alleging its members owe California $60-120 billion for circumventing land recording fees.

MERS has also been at the center of recent foreclosure chaos.

Since the founding of America, counties in the United States have maintained public records of land, mortgages and deeds of trust, by maintaining indexes of grantors and grantees. Register of Deeds offices ensure transparency and an important check and balance in private property ownership. County recording practices have been in place for 300 years. “It is interesting that the first fundamental change in public land title recording systems was not initiated by publicly elected leaders, but a small group of mortgage industry insiders. Now it’s coming back to bite all of us- homeowners and taxpayers. MERS creates a system where only certain eyes see the data and what’s going on. I have a real problem with that as a Recorder.

Thigpen is asking for clarity on the California suit and others surrounding MERS business practices in packaging and repackages home owner loans through securitization. MERS has saved larger financial firms millions of dollars while avoiding recordation and payment of fees related to mortgage transfers.

Since 2005 there were 47,553 deeds of trust that list MERS as a beneficiary filed in the Guilford County Register of Deeds office. Experts have indicated that those kinds of loans are repackaged and sold two and four times on average under the MERS system. “One repackaging of MERS documents would have generated $665,742 if documentation had been filed in our office. Two repackaged loans would have generated $1,331,484. And that’s conservative estimate.”
Thigpen maintains the lost recording fees would help local elected officials reduce budget deficits and maintain core services such as public education and public safety in this time of fiscal crisis.

Thigpen’s primary concern relates to recent court rulings in Arkansas, Kansas, Maine and Missouri questioning MERS legal standing in home foreclosures and suits challenging that MERS filings may be fraudulent. “If MERS filings are false statements, there are laws that say if you decrease the money that you pay for a service through using those false statements then you can get damages. The legal term is “unjust enrichment”. Thigpen wants to explore unjust enrichment and other options related to recovery of lost revenue.

Thigpen acknowledges that NC General Statutes do not currently require assignments to be filed in local Register of Deeds offices which allow the public to know the rightful owner of a mortgage. “That may need to change among other things”, says Thigpen. Thigpen points to a major policy change from MERS in the past two weeks conceding that assignments should be filed in public registries across the country even if the state law does not require it and instructed members not to foreclose in MERS name. “It indicates to me that they know they need to fix this.”
“It used to be that if you bought a house, the mortgage would stay at a single bank until you paid it off. Times have changed. Through securitization, mortgages are all put in a blender and sold off to Wall Street investors and Fannie and Freddie among others. MERS has its finger on the spin button. At the end of the day with MERS, Susie Homeowner can’t keep track of who owns her loan and if she’s going to get hit with new fees or even foreclosure.

“This type of unregulated greed is giving charity to all the people who should be giving it and undermines good business practices.” says Thigpen. Thigpen points out those local credit unions like State Employees Credit Union who didn’t participate in sub-prime lending have avoided legal difficulties.

“This is a mess and the MERS system impacts millions of homeowners across the country in danger of having their homes foreclosed”, said Thigpen. He wants a review of the lawsuits and investigations into MERS by state attorney generals and others and believes it will take a coordinated at the local, state and federal level to resolve it. “To me these issues with MERS are simple. Are major banking conglomerates going to tell the truth or not; and are we going choose to have two standards of justice in America: one for Big Money and the other for the rest of us?

Thigpen will also join Southern Sussex Massachusetts Register of Deeds John O’Brian, Jr. in urging national organizations such as the International Association of Clerks, Recorders, Election Officials and Treasurers (IACREOT) to address MERS in the coming weeks.



to post a comment on this article: login - or - register

I just don't see how MERS is liable for recording fees on Assignments it DID NOT file.  Should they have filed them (and paid the fee), I believe so.  But the fact is that nothing was recorded, thus no fee was due.  If the Assignments were legally required, I would think they should be ordered to file them and the obligation to pay the fees would arise at that time.  Maybe that is what they are arguing, but it isn't really clear.  It just appears to be that the Recorders in these types of suits are just asking for the fees as damages.

I see clients all the time who have un-recorded land contracts.  Although those should be recorded, we don't see anyone claiming that the fee is due on those. 

I guess the way I see is that if the Recorder did not record anything, they haven't earned a fee.

to post a reply: login - or - register

Robert,

Aren't the clerks asking for these fees because someone (MERS?) was supposed to file the Assignments?  I am probably missing something here.

 

to post a reply: login - or - register

Maybe, but I get the impression they are just asking for the fees... not that they actually record ALL of the many thousands of assignments, many of which would have no relevance today. If they are actually asking for them to record all of the assignments, that is one thing, but I don't think they have a right to fees if they aren't going to actually be recording them.

to post a reply: login - or - register

They certainly do not sound like strong cases, and these two county recorders may even recognize that.  But even if they can't win cases like this on the merits, it's just one more battle that MERS has to fight, and I think they believe that if enough people keep pecking away at MERS, it will fall.  Then, they will get future fees for recordings on future transactions that they feel they have been missing out on.

And who knows-- the case might find its way into a court where the judge wants to make his or her own anti-bank statement.

Plus, these county recorders who have taken on MERS get their name in the press.  If you're a county recorder, how many opportunities do you have to do something popular like taking on the big bad banks? 

 

to post a reply: login - or - register

Robert,

Do you think that a borrower in foreclosure would have standing to sue MERS and ask for class certification? Has this type of case already been filed? Seems like class action attorneys would/should be all over this issue.

 

 

to post a reply: login - or - register

The position of the Register of Deeds is ridiculous, since the article makes clear, assignments are not required to be recorded. The rhetoric being employed is over the top, and clearly intended to simply gain publicity for the official(s) involved.

By the way, in a non-plant area, can you imagine running the out-conveyances of Bank of America, Wells Fargo, etc. to locate each assignment?

to post a reply: login - or - register
It is just another way for the Recorder to try to gain another buck. I believe in Ohio we pay a "notation" fee or something to that effect when MERS appears on the mortgage at the time of recording. It is less than the assignment fee but enough to cause questions as to the extra recording fee showing on my HUD. Everyone is going broke and they are desperate to gain any funds by any e=means necessary!


to post a reply: login - or - register

Another example of a recorder of deeds sticking their head out a window and yelling,,,"it's my money and I want it now!!!!

If the so called Assignments aren't recorded, then no fee is due the recorder. The recorder gets paid for the recordation of a document, not the possible requirement of a document to be filed, How has the recorder been damaged in a unrecorded assignment that may not have been required to be filed ?

to post a reply: login - or - register

There is no "requirement" that the public file any title matter.  However, if a deed or an assignment or other matter is NOT recorded, then the parties cannot expect a Court of Law and Record to enforce terms of a document to which they are not privy.  Oh, well.  So sad, too bad, if you don't have a proper assignment and seek to  enforce some idea of civil "rights" that you have not perfected gaining.

to post a reply: login - or - register


Directory

The Source of Title Business directory has 8923 listed companies.

Leave feedback on a company:
SOT ID #:  learn more...
DRN Title Search
Blogs

Read other users' blogs-- or start your own!

Most Recent Blog Posts:

Looking for Pennsylvania Abstractors/Searchers
Tyler Noble's Blog
2024/06/04
0 comments

Looking for Vermont Abstractors/Searchers
Tyler Noble's Blog
2024/06/04
0 comments

Unveiling the Costs: Why Commercial Title Searches Command a Premium
Security American's Blog
2024/04/17
0 comments

Forums

Source of Title's Forums are the place for title industry discussions.
Recent posts in the forums:



Classifieds

Buy, sell, or trade! Browse the ads or post your own!

LOCAL SEARCHERS (PA& EVERYWHERE)-WE PAY
June 04 2024
We are an AMERICAN production and marketplace company, working with most of the major underwriters and Seeking LOCAL independant title searcher(s) for regular work in the following PA counties:
Huntingdon
Mifflin
Juniata
Greene
Warren
Cameron...[more info]


link
email
© 2020, Source of Title.