I expect all of those fees to be rolled into your search fee, and not stashed into a copy charge that most of your customers would believe to be passed through.  What are you not understanding about this?

If you said copy service fee?  Maybe.  But copy charges?  Obviously intended to be clerk charges passed through to the customer to prevent disadvantaging of the searcher in the event of a large number of pages. 

You guys can be such whiners sometimes.  "Would YOU agree to work for nothing?"  No, actually, what I wouldn't agree to do is pay a disguised fee that really should just be added to the top of your current owner pricing.  Which you're trying to obfuscate because your customers are trying to negotiate it down and you want to appear to be more competitive than you are.

I certainly never suggested you should work for nothing.  I didn't even suggest you should work for less.  Kindly get it together.