Afternoon Joseph--

You  are only ever liable to the extent you agree to be liable for a nonstandard product like this--meaning that the insurance implications aren't there if you decline to let them be, but certainly your client is going to consider the quality of your work as it places orders and will act accordingly.

 As I said to Alix, however, I am pretty generally against invoicing at less than a current owner rate for any work performed, unless it legitimately does not involve anything resembling a current owner search (tax data retrieval is a reasonable example, or reviews for code enforcement liens and the like where the client provides the bulk of the identifying data). So I think we more or less agree in principle, I just believe that the future of this industry is going to increasingly rely on nonstandard products and that searchers should be ready to think outside the current owner/2 owner/REO/full search box in which title companies generally operate.  

 Aside from that, if you're suggesting I am violating some rule of etiquette, please state it directly, as I am not taking your hint.