Well, if it does not meet the requirements of the civil statutes for reccording, then a "review" is not possible, except to the extent of indicating that it is not recordable as it stands.
If they follow-up with an actual recordable paper bearing all the legal bells and whistles, then reviewing it's recorability would pass muster as a document in and of itself, but it would certainly not meet sufficiency to record from a clear title perspective.
I'm not sure what position you are in regarding your client. If my title company asked this, I would certainly note the flaw in the chain of title as a matter of concern and tell them to send it in for recording themselves if they feel the need to record it despite the broken chain. I would not record it for them, if I'd been asked to examine it; not without a blanket letter of indemnity from them regarding this matter.
Even then, if I smelled or suspected fraud with any reasonable concern, I'd step away entierely.
to post a reply:
login - or -
register