I really wish people would read articles completely before going off on a subject.

From the article:

"The law firm filed an affidavit with the local sheriff saying there was no evidence Sergeant Hurley was on military duty. "

It has been admitted that an error was made and the foreclosure was improper. That is NOT what this lawsuit is about. It is about the request for punitive damages which the bank does not feel should be allowed. Given the chain of events, I concur with the defendant that punitive damages should be assessed. However, that is for the courts to decide.