Register
Log In
Forget your Password?

Home
Directory
Bulletins
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Links
Classifieds
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
FAQ
Privacy Policy


Discussion
<< get older messagesget newer messages >>
to post a message: login - or - register | search messages | hide all replies



Taxes for info purposes only - john rutledge/VA
4/12/2010 9:39:07 AM (4127 views)
Re: Taxes for info purposes only - Robert Franco/OH
4/12/2010 9:45:17 AM (4576 views)
Re: Taxes for info purposes only - William Pattison /CA
4/12/2010 12:06:36 PM (4460 views)
Re: Taxes for info purposes only - K C/NJ
4/12/2010 8:47:31 PM (4285 views)
Re: Taxes for info purposes only - Justin Shepard/VA
4/12/2010 11:01:44 PM (4371 views)
Re: Taxes for info purposes only - Leigh Attridge/MA
4/13/2010 7:30:24 AM (4250 views)

JMC Title Agency/Knoxville TN & New York? - Jean Allen/NC
4/11/2010 9:32:55 AM (5752 views)
Re: JMC Title Agency/Knoxville TN & New York? - Nils Nelson/ME
4/11/2010 5:28:16 PM (5021 views)
Re: JMC Title Agency/Knoxville TN & New York? - Hillary Bendle/TN
4/12/2010 8:40:48 AM (4750 views)
Re: JMC Title Agency/Knoxville TN & New York? - Matthew DeLand/NY
4/26/2010 10:30:52 AM (4525 views)
Re: JMC Title Agency/Knoxville TN & New York? - Josh Lowe/TN
4/27/2010 12:04:31 PM (5132 views)
Re: JMC Title Agency/Knoxville TN & New York? - Josh Lowe/TN
4/27/2010 12:06:22 PM (4490 views)
Re: JMC Title Agency/Knoxville TN & New York? - Katrina Chambers/AR
5/3/2010 10:34:12 AM (4325 views)
Re: JMC Title Agency/Knoxville TN & New York? - Jean Allen/NC
5/3/2010 11:38:45 AM (5203 views)
Re: JMC Title Agency/Knoxville TN & New York? - Jean Allen/NC
5/6/2010 7:31:57 PM (4444 views)
Re: JMC Title Agency/Knoxville TN & New York? - Josh Lowe/TN
5/11/2010 4:42:45 PM (4352 views)
Re: JMC Title Agency/Knoxville TN & New York? - Nils Nelson/ME
5/11/2010 5:01:45 PM (4244 views)

Synergy Title - Mark Pierson/FL
4/9/2010 12:43:28 PM (4314 views)
Re: Synergy Title - Abstractor/WI
4/11/2010 8:14:02 PM (4395 views)
Re: Synergy Title - george Hubka/MI
4/11/2010 10:14:51 PM (4404 views)
Re: Synergy Title - Mark Pierson/FL
4/12/2010 7:41:00 AM (4377 views)

Online Title Abstracting Courses - James McManus/IN
4/9/2010 11:14:18 AM (4196 views)
Re: Online Title Abstracting Courses - K C/NJ
4/9/2010 11:48:02 AM (4675 views)
Re: Online Title Abstracting Courses - James McManus/IN
4/9/2010 4:25:06 PM (4673 views)
Re: Online Title Abstracting Courses - Diane Brewer/SC
4/12/2010 9:24:57 AM (4641 views)
Re: Online Title Abstracting Courses - Teri Carro/FL
4/12/2010 10:41:52 AM (4998 views)
Re: Online Title Abstracting Courses - Robert Franco/OH
4/12/2010 10:52:57 AM (5086 views)
Re: Online Title Abstracting Courses - Jim McManus/IN
4/12/2010 7:19:25 PM (4586 views)
Re: Online Title Abstracting Courses - Jim McManus/IN
4/14/2010 12:38:33 PM (5958 views)
Re: Online Title Abstracting Courses - Jeanine Johnson/FL
4/15/2010 4:52:36 PM (6993 views)
Re: Online Title Abstracting Courses - Jim McManus/IN
4/16/2010 3:24:42 PM (4644 views)
Re: Online Title Abstracting Courses - Jeanine Johnson/FL
5/14/2010 12:59:59 PM (4846 views)
Re: Online Title Abstracting Courses - charles jetter/OH
4/21/2010 2:43:46 PM (5011 views)

Abstractors A Go Go, LLC is a No No!! - Eric S./NY
4/8/2010 7:55:07 PM (7653 views)
Re: Abstractors A Go Go, LLC is a No No!! - Sheila Sten/PA
4/8/2010 9:18:12 PM (5241 views)
Re: Abstractors A Go Go, LLC is a No No!! - Eric S/NY
4/14/2010 4:58:01 PM (4704 views)
Re: Abstractors A Go Go, LLC is a No No!! - Jerry Morgan/VA
6/1/2011 11:14:59 PM (4056 views)
Re: Abstractors A Go Go, LLC is a No No!! - REBECCA RIZZONELLI/PA
6/19/2013 1:11:19 PM (2921 views)
Re: Abstractors A Go Go, LLC is a No No!! - K C/NJ
4/9/2010 11:06:19 AM (4849 views)
Re: Abstractors A Go Go, LLC is a No No!! - Ken Ungarsohn/NJ
4/9/2010 12:53:11 PM (5453 views)
What about Charles ? - george Hubka/MI
4/9/2010 11:56:41 PM (4741 views)
Re: Abstractors A Go Go, LLC is a No No!! - Eric S/NY
4/14/2010 4:49:17 PM (4909 views)
Re: Abstractors A Go Go, LLC is a No No!! - Robert Alvey/VA
9/24/2010 8:49:53 AM (4124 views)
Re: Abstractors A Go Go, LLC is a No No!! - charles jetter/OH
4/9/2010 8:45:57 PM (4734 views)
Re: Abstractors A Go Go, LLC is a No No!! - john rutledge/VA
4/12/2010 9:09:35 AM (4824 views)
Re: Abstractors A Go Go, LLC is a No No!! - Robert Franco/OH
4/12/2010 9:27:56 AM (4782 views)
Re: Abstractors A Go Go, LLC is a No No!! - K C/NJ
4/12/2010 7:50:17 PM (4697 views)

I'd like to say that not all middle-men companies are the same.  Lumping us all in with someone whose business practices are questionable isn't fair to companies like ours, Wanda's and others who respect the work you do and actually understand various facets of the industry because of their own experience - AND WHO PAY YOU.  

I'm sure you're all aware there are independents who are not like you who go MIA, who have no experience, don't respect that we're accountable to our clients., don't read one bit of the order.  It wouldn't be fair of me to put you all in the same category.

I personally find it loathesome to ask someone to reduce their livelihood in order to increase my income -  not to mention it's an uncomfortable call to make.  We don't ask independents to reduce their prices when we're expanding our coverage - we ask what they charge;  however if they're pricing themselves out of their local competition and we get the call later asking why we haven't sent anything, I'll be truthful -  then it's their choice what they want to charge.  We work something out or part congenially. This isn't to say we always work with the cheapest person in a county - you pay for experience and knowledge in most cases.  Being easy to work with and being friendly and accommodating (and accessible) go a long way too.  Asking someone to be the cheapest isn't going to get your orders prioritized.  Not paying your searchers is not going to have that effect either.  We have loyalty to many abstractors even if we get offers of lower pricing.  Just because we are the same types of businesses doesn't mean you're dealing with the same types of people... and this business is still about people!

Your insinuation that the middle-men do nothing is not accurate. Do we need you?  Of course.  Can you live without us, sure but you may be cheating yourself of the relationships we've spent the time, technology and money to build with nationwide companies who don't want to find each of you themselves and who still prefer to work with American companies.  They don't want to have to deal with sending out 400 $40 checks each month, they don't want the headache of remembering who does which county, having to pore over SOT listings and if it's a remote county, trying to hunt down someone at the courthouse. They can call us, or Wanda, or Anthony or whomever it is they deal with and they know who they're talking to immediately.  The middle-men have spent the time making the 1000's of calls to find the right people in the counties.  And if they're smart they have researched and found the clients they CHOOSE to work with rather than take every offer dangled in front of them only to find later they're never going to be paid. 

The in-between has a unique perspective and some of you disparage us the way you do the big national guys and I usually silently look on and occassionally laugh when I see a thread that starts this way.  We certainly don't set the prices and I know I personally can't tell a multi-million dollar title company I want to be paid on MY schedule. To the big guys, we're just as pipsqueak as you. Sure, they must respect we need to be paid and to honor the general 30-60 day time frame but I can't demand they pay in a week.

To some of you, we're all about lining our pockets for doing nothing and for some, that certainly seems to be revealing itself.  For others here, you've seen the value of working with the Tweeners.   Being in the middle is chaotic and the crap rolls up and down in each direction - toward US in the middle.  We try to keep a happy medium.  Some days this office is like Boiler Room.  All day we're fielding calls, following up, doing oddball 'favors' for clients, researching things above and beyond the norm all across the country, retyping the reports that look like a 3rd grader wrote them .   Being the middle-man is not all bad by any means and can be fun but you certainly have to be able to engage with both independents, clients and maintain a sense of humor above all. 

Just please don't throw us all on the fire because of a few bad ones out there.

to post a reply: login - or - register


Re: Abstractors A Go Go, LLC is a No No!! - Alix Ott/MI
4/19/2010 7:03:31 AM (4614 views)
Re: Abstractors A Go Go, LLC is a No No!! - Robert Franco/OH
4/20/2010 9:48:22 AM (4445 views)
Re: Abstractors A Go Go, LLC is a No No!! - Eric S/NY
4/14/2010 4:53:40 PM (4632 views)




Cybersecurity Act - Amy Jensen/OR
4/8/2010 3:29:03 PM (3628 views)
Re: Cybersecurity Act - William Pattison /CA
4/12/2010 12:14:10 PM (4159 views)

FLORIDA SEEKING TO PASS NEW LEGISLATION ALLOWING NON JUDICIAL FORECLOSURES - CHARLENE  PERRY/MD
4/6/2010 12:02:55 PM (5136 views)
Re: FLORIDA SEEKING TO PASS NEW LEGISLATION ALLOWING NON JUDICIAL FORECLOSURES - mason haas/NY
4/6/2010 3:34:46 PM (4205 views)
Re: FLORIDA SEEKING TO PASS NEW LEGISLATION ALLOWING NON JUDICIAL FORECLOSURES - Abstractor/AL
4/6/2010 3:56:28 PM (4271 views)
Re: FLORIDA SEEKING TO PASS NEW LEGISLATION ALLOWING NON JUDICIAL FORECLOSURES - CHARLENE  PERRY/MD
4/7/2010 12:06:49 PM (4296 views)

WARNING: FAKE SOT EMAIL NOTICE! - Robert Franco/OH
4/6/2010 9:00:38 AM (4386 views)
Re: WARNING: FAKE SOT EMAIL NOTICE! - Patrick/NY
4/6/2010 9:51:41 AM (4449 views)
Re: WARNING: FAKE SOT EMAIL NOTICE! - CHARLENE  PERRY/MD
4/6/2010 12:03:45 PM (4391 views)
Re: WARNING: FAKE SOT EMAIL NOTICE! - Slade Smith/OH
4/6/2010 12:38:59 PM (4930 views)
Re: WARNING: FAKE SOT EMAIL NOTICE! - Nils Nelson/ME
4/6/2010 4:02:40 PM (4352 views)
Re: WARNING: FAKE SOT EMAIL NOTICE! - charles jetter/OH
4/9/2010 8:50:01 PM (4311 views)
Re: WARNING: FAKE SOT EMAIL NOTICE! - charles jetter/OH
4/21/2010 3:09:58 PM (4149 views)

WV ousting independent abstractors - Patricia Perry/WV
4/6/2010 12:12:17 AM (4358 views)
Re: WV ousting independent abstractors - Kristi Lee/NE
4/7/2010 1:14:05 PM (4791 views)
Re: WV ousting independent abstractors - William Pattison /CA
4/7/2010 6:58:54 PM (5761 views)
Re: WV ousting independent abstractors - Slade Smith/OH
4/7/2010 7:25:00 PM (6653 views)
Re: WV ousting independent abstractors - Robert Franco/OH
4/7/2010 10:52:16 PM (4545 views)
Hmm... "examination" - Bobbi Shorthouse, Notary Public/CT
4/8/2010 10:40:05 AM (4549 views)
Re: Hmm... "examination" - Slade Smith/OH
4/8/2010 2:22:28 PM (6029 views)
Re: Hmm... "examination" - Patrick Scott/IL
4/8/2010 8:06:12 PM (6296 views)
Re: WV ousting independent abstractors - Patrick Scott/IL
4/7/2010 7:27:03 PM (4492 views)
You are right: WV ousting independents - Bobbi Shorthouse, Notary Public/CT
4/9/2010 7:45:29 AM (4403 views)
Re: WV ousting independent abstractors - Patricia /WV
4/12/2010 1:30:07 PM (4405 views)
Re: WV ousting independent abstractors - Leigh Attridge/MA
4/12/2010 8:45:15 AM (4363 views)
Re: WV ousting independent abstractors - Diane Brewer/SC
4/12/2010 9:34:24 AM (4982 views)
Re: WV ousting independent abstractors - Robert Franco/OH
4/12/2010 10:17:02 AM (4574 views)

Infinity International Processing Services Inc - Matt Burger/VA
4/5/2010 9:21:10 PM (7935 views)
Re: Infinity International Processing Services Inc - Michael Vernon/AZ
4/19/2010 3:31:47 AM (4292 views)

NALTEA Seminar/ MN Licensing - Jeanine Johnson/MN
4/5/2010 3:05:53 PM (4300 views)

Micah Mortgage - David Chisolm/MS
4/5/2010 2:12:16 PM (4549 views)
Re: Micah Mortgage - Scott Perry/PA
4/5/2010 6:12:42 PM (4227 views)
Re: Micah Mortgage - David Chisolm/MS
4/5/2010 6:43:49 PM (4278 views)
Re: Micah Mortgage - Scott Perry/PA
4/5/2010 6:59:11 PM (4282 views)

HEALT CARE BILL EXEMPTION FOR SENATORS? - CHARLENE  PERRY/MD
4/5/2010 1:29:24 PM (3822 views)
Re: HEALT CARE BILL EXEMPTION FOR SENATORS? - Robert Franco/OH
4/5/2010 3:09:27 PM (4147 views)
Re: HEALT CARE BILL EXEMPTION FOR SENATORS? - Scott Perry/PA
4/5/2010 6:18:59 PM (4201 views)
Re: HEALT CARE BILL EXEMPTION FOR SENATORS? - Robert Franco/OH
4/5/2010 9:55:08 PM (4206 views)
Re: HEALT CARE BILL EXEMPTION FOR SENATORS? - Scott Perry/PA
4/5/2010 9:59:07 PM (4171 views)
Re: HEALT CARE BILL EXEMPTION FOR SENATORS? - Douglas Gallant/OH
4/7/2010 4:50:49 PM (4025 views)
Re: HEALT CARE BILL EXEMPTION FOR SENATORS? - CHARLENE  PERRY/MD
4/8/2010 11:07:08 AM (3969 views)
Re: HEALT CARE BILL EXEMPTION FOR SENATORS? - Scott Perry/PA
4/13/2010 10:52:49 PM (6116 views)
Re: HEALT CARE BILL EXEMPTION FOR SENATORS? - george Hubka/MI
4/17/2010 3:13:23 PM (4031 views)
WHY FOR SENATORS THEN? - george Hubka/MI
4/6/2010 8:07:55 PM (4155 views)
Re: WHY FOR SENATORS THEN? - charles jetter/OH
4/9/2010 9:17:25 PM (4023 views)
Re: HEALT CARE BILL EXEMPTION FOR SENATORS? - charles jetter/OH
4/9/2010 9:14:19 PM (4090 views)
Re: HEALT CARE BILL EXEMPTION FOR SENATORS? - charles jetter/OH
4/9/2010 9:11:44 PM (3919 views)
Re: HEALT CARE BILL EXEMPTION FOR SENATORS? - Scott Perry/PA
4/10/2010 12:21:30 AM (4128 views)
Re: HEALT CARE BILL EXEMPTION FOR SENATORS? - Carl Litchfield/SC
4/12/2010 11:29:08 AM (4081 views)
Re: HEALT CARE BILL EXEMPTION FOR SENATORS? - john rutledge/VA
4/19/2010 10:00:21 AM (4012 views)
Re: HEALT CARE BILL EXEMPTION FOR SENATORS? - Scott Perry/PA
4/19/2010 6:51:22 PM (3984 views)
Re: HEALT CARE BILL EXEMPTION FOR SENATORS? - Slade Smith/OH
4/20/2010 3:18:17 AM (5767 views)
Re: HEALT CARE BILL EXEMPTION FOR SENATORS? - Scott Perry/PA
4/20/2010 7:00:30 AM (4085 views)
Re: HEALT CARE BILL EXEMPTION FOR SENATORS? - Slade Smith/OH
4/20/2010 12:08:32 PM (5551 views)
Re: HEALT CARE BILL EXEMPTION FOR SENATORS? - Scott Perry/PA
4/20/2010 6:20:19 PM (4108 views)
Re: HEALT CARE BILL EXEMPTION FOR SENATORS? - Slade Smith/OH
4/21/2010 1:27:44 AM (3766 views)
Re: HEALT CARE BILL EXEMPTION FOR SENATORS? - Scott Perry/PA
4/21/2010 6:35:03 AM (3954 views)
Re: HEALT CARE BILL EXEMPTION FOR SENATORS? - Slade Smith/OH
4/21/2010 6:08:33 PM (5564 views)
Re: HEALT CARE BILL EXEMPTION FOR SENATORS? - Scott Perry/PA
4/21/2010 6:36:17 PM (4294 views)
Re: HEALT CARE BILL EXEMPTION FOR SENATORS? - Slade Smith/OH
4/21/2010 7:26:20 PM (3924 views)
Re: HEALT CARE BILL EXEMPTION FOR SENATORS? - Scott Perry/PA
4/21/2010 9:32:19 PM (3992 views)
Re: HEALT CARE BILL EXEMPTION FOR SENATORS? - Scott Perry/PA
4/19/2010 11:57:25 PM (4027 views)

Doctor view of health care crisis - george Hubka/MI
4/2/2010 9:54:50 PM (3923 views)
Re: Doctor view of health care crisis - Leigh Attridge/MA
4/12/2010 8:50:41 AM (3887 views)
Re: Doctor view of health care crisis - george Hubka/MI
4/12/2010 4:46:19 PM (3998 views)
Re: Doctor view of health care crisis - Leigh Attridge/MA
4/12/2010 7:01:18 PM (3901 views)
Re: Doctor view of health care crisis - george Hubka/MI
4/12/2010 10:13:10 PM (3960 views)
Re: Doctor view of health care crisis - Leigh Attridge/MA
4/13/2010 7:34:30 AM (3909 views)

Dumb Congressman can't speak for themself - george Hubka/MI
4/1/2010 7:05:32 PM (3798 views)
Re: Dumb Congressman can't speak for themself - Leigh Attridge/MA
4/12/2010 8:46:26 AM (3991 views)
Re: Dumb Congressman can't speak for themself - William Pattison /CA
4/12/2010 12:27:21 PM (4130 views)
Re: Dumb Congressman can't speak for themself - george Hubka/MI
4/12/2010 4:32:46 PM (4042 views)
Re: Dumb Congressman can't speak for themself - Leigh Attridge/MA
4/12/2010 7:00:05 PM (4067 views)
Re: Dumb Congressman can't speak for themself - Abstractor/IL
4/12/2010 7:38:21 PM (3978 views)
Re: Dumb Congressman can't speak for themself - Leigh Attridge/MA
4/12/2010 7:50:36 PM (3942 views)
Re: Dumb Congressman can't speak for themself - Abstractor/IL
4/12/2010 8:14:31 PM (3877 views)
Re: Dumb Congressman can't speak for themself - george Hubka/MI
4/12/2010 10:16:30 PM (3974 views)
Re: Dumb Congressman can't speak for themself - Leigh Attridge/MA
4/12/2010 10:25:30 PM (3937 views)
Re: Dumb Congressman can't speak for themself - William Pattison /CA
4/16/2010 4:04:36 PM (3918 views)
Re: Dumb Congressman can't speak for themself - george Hubka/MI
4/16/2010 9:04:36 PM (3887 views)


<< get older messagesget newer messages >>

DISCLAIMER: These Message Forums are un-moderated and Source of Title does not endorse the content of any of the posts. Source of Title discourages libelous comments and you, as the sole creator of the content, take full responsibility for your remarks.
Directory

The Source of Title Business directory has 8973 listed companies.

Leave feedback on a company:
SOT ID #:  learn more...
DRN Title Search
Blogs

Read other users' blogs-- or start your own!

Most Recent Blog Posts:

What Is Title Insurance & Benefits
Michael Stelzer's Blog
2026/03/14
0 comments

The Source of Title - Part I: Freedom Written, Freedom Insured
Ben DuBay's Blog
2026/02/15
0 comments

Shared Driveway Agreements
Marissa Berends's Blog
2025/12/10
0 comments

Articles

Source of Title articles help to keep you informed on the state of the title industry.

RecordsOnline and Leopard Consulting Group Publish White Paper on What "Real" AI Means in Title -- and Why a Human Examiner Is the Difference
"AI without an examiner in the loop isn't a title product. It's a liability. We built the loop," said Celia C. Flowers, ...
Second Century Ventures Announces 6 Technology Companies for 2026 REACH Scale-Up Program
For more than a decade, REACH has vetted, selected and accelerated unique technology solutions focused on the U.S. resid...
New Home Sales Down in April on Affordability Concerns
“Although there are still signs of demand, many potential buyers are stepping back because of higher mortgage rate...
D.A. Bragg Announces Indictment Of 18 Individuals & 3 Companies For Deed Theft Conspiracy
“Eighteen individuals went to extreme lengths to exploit a grieving family by allegedly conspiring to sell the fam...
Mortgage Applications Decrease in Latest MBA Weekly Survey
“The 30-year fixed rate has increased 30 basis points over the past five weeks to its highest level since August 2...

Search Articles:
browse...

Classifieds

Buy, sell, or trade! Browse the ads or post your own!

© 2020, Source of Title.