Register
Log In
Forget your Password?

Home
Directory
Bulletins
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Links
Classifieds
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
FAQ
Privacy Policy


Discussion
<< get older messagesget newer messages >>
to post a message: login - or - register | search messages | hide all replies



abstract realty, turnersville, nj DOES NOT PaY - KIMBERLY  FALCONE/PA
9/8/2008 5:56:17 AM (2848 views)

Jury Duty Scam - Scott Perry/PA
9/8/2008 12:58:32 AM (4419 views)

At last, solution to industry crisis!? - Jan Forster/NC
9/5/2008 11:47:55 PM (5150 views)
Re: At last, solution to industry crisis!? - Glenda Hodge/TN
9/6/2008 12:54:30 AM (3646 views)
Re: At last, solution to industry crisis!? - Vikki Moffitt/GA
9/6/2008 11:24:22 AM (3403 views)
Re: At last, solution to industry crisis!? - Robert Franco/OH
9/6/2008 11:39:47 AM (3405 views)
Re: At last, solution to industry crisis!? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/6/2008 1:45:44 PM (3305 views)
Re: At last, solution to industry crisis!? - Scott Perry/PA
9/6/2008 2:09:11 PM (3303 views)
Re: At last, solution to industry crisis!? - michael quinn/NY
9/6/2008 9:36:43 PM (3458 views)
Re: At last, solution to industry crisis!? - Jan Forster/NC
9/7/2008 9:15:52 PM (3461 views)
Re: At last, solution to industry crisis!? - Clanci Nelson/OH
9/10/2008 2:58:44 PM (3298 views)
Re: At last, solution to industry crisis!? - Robert Franco/OH
9/10/2008 3:03:25 PM (3197 views)
Re: At last, solution to industry crisis!? - Scott Perry/PA
9/10/2008 4:35:31 PM (3136 views)

Broadway Abstract Corp. - CARRIE DOZIER/NY
9/5/2008 12:46:55 PM (2695 views)

Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 10:51:13 AM (4732 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Anita Backlund/MN
9/5/2008 1:31:35 PM (3038 views)
Required Reading? - Robert Franco/OH
9/5/2008 1:41:19 PM (3092 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 1:45:44 PM (3042 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kurt deVries/FL
9/5/2008 2:16:30 PM (3054 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 5:01:37 PM (3014 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/5/2008 2:25:05 PM (5732 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 2:34:25 PM (2963 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/5/2008 2:44:43 PM (2943 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 3:05:21 PM (2990 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 4:46:25 PM (2994 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 5:15:20 PM (2932 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 5:24:19 PM (2889 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 5:32:19 PM (2959 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 5:33:48 PM (2849 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Robert Franco/OH
9/5/2008 8:04:22 PM (2959 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 9:21:21 PM (2966 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Robert Franco/OH
9/6/2008 12:06:31 AM (2958 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/6/2008 1:35:16 AM (3025 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Robert Franco/OH
9/6/2008 11:24:59 AM (2874 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/6/2008 1:24:11 PM (2926 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/6/2008 2:29:34 PM (2823 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/6/2008 2:55:09 PM (2887 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kurt deVries/FL
9/8/2008 5:05:24 PM (2771 views)
Re: Required Reading? - J Nisonger/CA
9/9/2008 7:03:37 PM (2671 views)
Re: Required Reading? - george Hubka/MI
9/28/2008 6:33:11 PM (2851 views)
Re: Required Reading? - michael quinn/NY
9/6/2008 3:11:42 AM (2882 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Robert Franco/OH
9/6/2008 11:37:09 AM (2962 views)
Re: Required Reading? - michael quinn/NY
9/6/2008 5:32:58 PM (2878 views)
Re: Required Reading? - michael quinn/NY
9/6/2008 3:13:26 AM (2856 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/5/2008 10:16:31 PM (2787 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/6/2008 7:30:00 AM (2956 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/6/2008 1:37:06 PM (2786 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/6/2008 2:27:42 PM (2822 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/6/2008 2:57:19 PM (2736 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/6/2008 3:30:21 PM (2882 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/7/2008 4:56:41 AM (2664 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Janis Talbot/SC
9/7/2008 11:44:22 AM (2856 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/6/2008 4:33:21 PM (2931 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/6/2008 5:01:21 PM (2795 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/6/2008 5:10:09 PM (2655 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/7/2008 8:47:00 AM (2700 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/7/2008 6:19:44 PM (2850 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/8/2008 12:16:09 AM (2687 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/8/2008 8:00:21 AM (2631 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/8/2008 10:57:16 AM (2654 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/8/2008 11:51:50 AM (2633 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/8/2008 12:57:23 PM (2647 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/8/2008 1:41:50 PM (2483 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/8/2008 2:05:26 PM (4554 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/8/2008 2:30:53 PM (2416 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/8/2008 3:46:53 PM (2463 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/8/2008 4:18:14 PM (2470 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/8/2008 4:59:45 PM (2427 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/8/2008 5:34:15 PM (2345 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/8/2008 6:19:58 PM (2400 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/8/2008 5:00:19 PM (2244 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/8/2008 5:39:49 PM (2475 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/8/2008 6:22:33 PM (2431 views)
Re: Required Reading? - michael quinn/NY
9/8/2008 7:06:45 PM (2347 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/9/2008 10:04:46 AM (2322 views)
Re: Required Reading? - monica froese/ME
9/8/2008 6:33:01 PM (2331 views)
Re: Required Reading? - michael quinn/NY
9/8/2008 12:49:58 PM (2367 views)
Re: Required Reading? - J Nisonger/CA
9/9/2008 7:18:13 PM (2235 views)
Re: Required Reading? - michael quinn/NY
9/6/2008 5:44:03 AM (2542 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/6/2008 8:50:04 AM (2504 views)
Re: Required Reading? - michael quinn/NY
9/6/2008 6:52:16 PM (2462 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/6/2008 10:05:58 PM (2669 views)
Re: Required Reading? - michael quinn/NY
9/6/2008 11:16:10 PM (2430 views)
Re: Required Reading? - charles jetter/OH
9/8/2008 7:15:38 AM (2381 views)
Re: Required Reading? - john rutledge/VA
9/8/2008 10:29:08 AM (2470 views)
Re: Required Reading? - J Nisonger/CA
9/9/2008 5:50:39 PM (2260 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/9/2008 8:43:19 PM (2344 views)
Re: Required Reading? - J Nisonger/CA
9/9/2008 11:10:03 PM (2284 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/10/2008 12:12:36 AM (2450 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Clanci Nelson/OH
9/10/2008 3:32:14 PM (2323 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 9:58:46 PM (2526 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/5/2008 2:45:55 PM (2565 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 3:06:41 PM (2425 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 4:53:15 PM (2545 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 4:48:37 PM (2376 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 5:06:07 PM (2376 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 5:08:28 PM (2433 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 5:10:47 PM (2583 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 5:12:30 PM (2330 views)
Re: Required Reading? - J Nisonger/CA
9/9/2008 5:54:22 PM (2199 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/9/2008 8:53:12 PM (2496 views)
Re: Required Reading? - J Nisonger/CA
9/9/2008 11:19:54 PM (2277 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/9/2008 11:35:46 PM (2465 views)
Re: Required Reading? - J Nisonger/CA
9/10/2008 12:00:06 AM (2395 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/10/2008 12:55:28 AM (2253 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/9/2008 10:20:53 PM (2253 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 5:18:42 PM (2359 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 4:54:46 PM (2493 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 5:02:54 PM (2497 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 5:06:18 PM (2513 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 5:08:24 PM (2479 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 5:09:55 PM (2420 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 5:12:05 PM (2490 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 5:14:11 PM (2426 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 5:16:22 PM (2418 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 5:25:38 PM (2345 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 5:35:40 PM (2387 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/5/2008 10:21:38 PM (4238 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 11:03:14 PM (2366 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/6/2008 7:58:35 AM (2637 views)
Re: Required Reading? - charles jetter/OH
9/8/2008 7:37:51 AM (2366 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - john rutledge/VA
9/8/2008 11:23:40 AM (2473 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/8/2008 4:17:30 PM (2475 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/8/2008 4:20:12 PM (2383 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/8/2008 4:22:41 PM (2369 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - john rutledge/VA
9/8/2008 7:35:41 PM (2399 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/8/2008 8:13:01 PM (2298 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - john rutledge/VA
9/8/2008 11:47:04 PM (2346 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/9/2008 6:56:02 AM (2169 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - J Nisonger/CA
9/9/2008 6:24:30 PM (2291 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/9/2008 8:32:11 PM (2474 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Anita Backlund/MN
9/9/2008 10:27:22 PM (2210 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - J Nisonger/CA
9/9/2008 11:49:48 PM (2215 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - J Nisonger/CA
9/9/2008 11:45:21 PM (2371 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/10/2008 12:52:40 AM (2260 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - michael quinn/NY
9/10/2008 6:26:38 AM (2319 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/10/2008 6:38:47 AM (2290 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/10/2008 7:12:39 AM (2228 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/10/2008 7:51:00 AM (2260 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/10/2008 10:12:53 AM (2171 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/10/2008 10:15:34 AM (2326 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/12/2008 9:00:43 AM (2313 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/12/2008 11:42:12 AM (2226 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/12/2008 9:15:13 PM (2241 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/13/2008 6:36:09 AM (2231 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/13/2008 12:07:24 PM (2150 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/13/2008 2:00:16 PM (2229 views)

Scott,

I really do not know how to put it into words simple enough for you to understand. However the Court's ruling on this was unmistakably clear:

       " Article I's plain language, read as a whole, establishes that Congress may authorize members of the National Guard of the United States to be ordered to active federal duty for purposes of training outside the United States without either the consent of a state governor or the declaration of a national emergency." Pp. 496 U. S. 347-355.

       "The unchallenged validity of the dual enlistment system means that Guard members lose their state status when called to active federal duty, and, if that duty is a training mission, the training is performed by the Army. During such periods, the second Militia Clause is no longer applicable." Pp. 496 U. S. 347-349.

       " The District Judge rejected the Governor's challenge. He explained that the National Guard consists of "two overlapping, but legally distinct, organizations. Congress, under its constitutional authority to 'raise and support armies' has created the National Guard of the United States, a federal organization comprised of state national guard units and their members. " 666 F.Supp. 1319, 1320 (Minn.1987). [Footnote 4] The fact that these units also maintain an identity as Page 496 U. S. 339 state national guards, part of the militia described in Art. I, § 8, of the Constitution, does not limit Congress' plenary authority to train the Guard "as it sees fit when the Guard is called to active federal service." Id. at 1324. He therefore concluded that "the gubernatorial veto found in §§ 672(b) and 672(d) is not constitutionally required. Having created the gubernatorial veto as an accommodation to the states, rather than pursuant to a constitutional mandate, the Congress may withdraw the veto without violating the Constitution."

         In answer to Anita's statement questioning the receipt of dual notifications from both the State and the Federal activation the court also addressed this issue. " Congress has by distinct statutes provided for activating the National Guard of the United States and for calling forth the militia, including the National Guards of the various States. See 10 U.S.C. §§ 672-675 (authorizing executive officials to order reserve forces, including the National Guard of the United States and the Air National Guard of the United States, to active duty); 10 U.S.C. §§ 331-333 (authorizing executive officials to call forth the militia of the States); 10 U.S.C. §§ 35OO, 8500 (authorizing executive officials to call forth the National Guards of the various States). When the National Guard units of the States are called forth, the orders "shall be issued through the governors of the States." 10 U.S.C. § 3500."

                " The unchallenged validity of the dual enlistment system means that the members of the National Guard of Minnesota who are ordered into federal service with the National Guard of the United States lose their status as members of the State militia during their period of active duty. If that duty is a training mission, the training is performed by the Army in which the trainee is serving, not by the militia from which the member has been temporarily disassociated."

               "Congress has provided by statute that, in addition to its National Guard, a State may provide and maintain at its own expense a defense force that is exempt from being drafted into the Armed Forces of the United States. See 32 U.S.C. § 109(c). As long as that provision remains in effect, there is no basis for an argument that the federal statutory scheme deprives Minnesota of any constitutional entitlement to a separate militia of its own. [Footnote 25]           

                  You have cited a portion of the footnote in question illustrating an example of when a gubernatorial veto might be exercised. You have omitted the portion of the footnote containing the Governors concessions that it is of little use, and subject to federal accommodation.  The Governor contends that the residual veto power is of little use. He predicates this argument, however, on a claim that the federal training program has so minimal an impact upon the State Guard that the veto is never necessary…To suggest that a governor will ever be able to withhold consent under the Montgomery Amendment assumes (1) local emergencies can be adequately predicted in advance, and (2) a governor can persuade federal authorities that National Guard members designated for training are needed for state purposes when the overwhelming majority of the National Guard remains at home."     [Footnote 24

               The above citations are not my words, but rather the words of the court. Since the gubernatorial veto of which you speak is a statutory accommodation and not a constitutional right, the accommodation may be withdrawn by Congress at will. While the circumstances may give rise to a gubernatorial veto, it is still subject to federal approval,  not a matter of right and there is no guaranty of securing agreement of the federal government.

        

 

 

to post a reply: login - or - register


Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/13/2008 2:17:54 PM (2316 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/13/2008 6:37:46 AM (2402 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/13/2008 6:39:19 AM (2267 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - J Nisonger/CA
9/10/2008 1:53:00 PM (2346 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/10/2008 1:59:32 PM (2300 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - J Nisonger/CA
9/10/2008 2:17:04 PM (4030 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/12/2008 7:54:46 AM (2319 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/12/2008 8:32:22 AM (4164 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/12/2008 9:32:21 AM (2389 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/12/2008 10:07:14 AM (2427 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/12/2008 10:34:24 AM (2471 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - michael quinn/NY
9/15/2008 2:04:15 AM (2494 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/15/2008 5:05:56 AM (2286 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - michael quinn/NY
9/15/2008 2:41:32 PM (2426 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/15/2008 3:22:43 PM (2454 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Slade Smith/OH
9/9/2008 2:44:44 AM (2286 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/9/2008 6:39:55 AM (2281 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - J Nisonger/CA
9/9/2008 6:29:31 PM (2266 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/9/2008 9:16:03 PM (2179 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Anita Backlund/MN
9/9/2008 10:33:47 PM (2316 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - J Nisonger/CA
9/9/2008 11:54:12 PM (2304 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/10/2008 1:00:43 AM (2156 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/10/2008 1:00:52 AM (2252 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Anita Backlund/MN
9/10/2008 11:38:47 AM (2299 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - J Nisonger/CA
9/10/2008 1:25:41 PM (2310 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/10/2008 4:07:47 PM (2294 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/10/2008 4:50:38 PM (2339 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Douglas Gallant/OH
9/10/2008 6:02:05 PM (2487 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/10/2008 7:37:23 PM (2307 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Clanci Nelson/OH
9/12/2008 11:47:07 AM (2497 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - michael quinn/NY
9/13/2008 2:48:17 PM (2235 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Clanci Nelson/OH
9/16/2008 11:45:00 AM (2358 views)




STOP STOP STOP - . APS/NY
9/4/2008 3:35:36 PM (3508 views)
Re: STOP STOP STOP - Robert Breakell/CT
9/4/2008 5:23:29 PM (3329 views)
Re: STOP STOP STOP - . APS/NY
9/4/2008 10:00:54 PM (3401 views)
Re: STOP STOP STOP - Helene /GA
9/15/2008 10:29:49 PM (2955 views)
This is one of the best posts I have ever seen! - Jean Allen/NC
9/18/2008 8:13:59 AM (2945 views)
Re: This is one of the best posts I have ever seen! - Helene /GA
9/18/2008 11:46:49 PM (2978 views)
Cheap Un-Searches in CT - Bobbi Shorthouse, Notary Public/CT
9/5/2008 8:10:33 AM (3292 views)
Re: STOP STOP STOP - ANTHONY MUZIO/NY
9/4/2008 6:09:17 PM (3265 views)
Re: STOP STOP STOP - rw/VA
9/6/2008 8:40:02 PM (3176 views)
Re: STOP STOP STOP - J Nisonger/CA
9/11/2008 6:54:13 PM (2923 views)
Absolute Property Service? - Matt Papsch/MD
9/9/2008 9:25:14 PM (3012 views)
Re: Absolute Property Service? - . APS/NY
9/10/2008 8:56:25 PM (2976 views)
Re: Absolute Property Service? - Matt Papsch/MD
9/11/2008 5:33:37 PM (2888 views)
Re: Absolute Property Service? - . APS/NY
9/15/2008 8:12:15 PM (2927 views)
Re: Absolute Property Service? - Robert Franco/OH
9/15/2008 10:15:53 PM (3031 views)

CMS-Consumer Marketing Services - Patrick /NY
9/4/2008 1:26:57 PM (5263 views)
Re: CMS-Consumer Marketing Services - Robert Franco/OH
9/4/2008 1:55:55 PM (3352 views)
Re: CMS-Consumer Marketing Services - . APS/NY
9/4/2008 3:29:56 PM (3271 views)

Ohio Sick-day Ballot Initiative Pulled! - Robert Franco/OH
9/4/2008 1:01:46 PM (2525 views)

Dynamic Signings - Ilene Seidel/MD
9/3/2008 10:15:28 PM (2647 views)

Owners Title Policy Tells Consumer Nothing - Jeanine Johnson/FL
9/3/2008 5:05:25 PM (3330 views)
Re: Owners Title Policy Tells Consumer Nothing - Patrick Scott/IL
9/3/2008 8:28:36 PM (6420 views)
Re: Owners Title Policy Tells Consumer Nothing - Scott Perry/PA
9/4/2008 12:25:35 AM (6525 views)
Re: Owners Title Policy Tells Consumer Nothing - Diane Cipa/PA
9/4/2008 11:07:11 AM (3319 views)
Re: Owners Title Policy Tells Consumer Nothing - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/4/2008 12:07:53 PM (3311 views)
Re: Owners Title Policy Tells Consumer Nothing - Jeanine Johnson/FL
9/4/2008 4:38:57 PM (3335 views)
Re: Owners Title Policy Tells Consumer Nothing - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/4/2008 5:05:15 PM (3245 views)
Re: Owners Title Policy Tells Consumer Nothing - Diane Cipa/PA
9/5/2008 12:33:03 PM (3287 views)
Re: Owners Title Policy Tells Consumer Nothing - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 12:47:07 PM (3305 views)
Re: Owners Title Policy Tells Consumer Nothing - Robert Franco/OH
9/5/2008 1:47:09 PM (3222 views)
Re: Owners Title Policy Tells Consumer Nothing - Jeanine Johnson/FL
9/9/2008 3:50:35 PM (3025 views)
Re: Owners Title Policy Tells Consumer Nothing - Douglas Gallant/OH
9/9/2008 6:16:07 PM (3082 views)

GMAC Streamlining of Mortgage Operation - Rochelle Finci/MD
9/3/2008 1:34:54 PM (2819 views)

ProTitle USA - Virginia Capps/TN
9/3/2008 10:27:29 AM (4578 views)
Re: ProTitle USA - Joanie Hahr/VT
9/7/2008 7:17:18 PM (3804 views)
Re: ProTitle USA - Virginia Capps/TN
9/8/2008 1:03:54 PM (3696 views)
Re: ProTitle USA - Melinda Barcum, J.D./AL
12/14/2008 6:47:29 PM (3637 views)
Re: ProTitle USA - Joyce/NM
9/8/2008 3:02:06 PM (3940 views)
Re: ProTitle USA - Michael Romano/FL
3/5/2010 2:31:39 PM (3355 views)
Re: ProTitle USA - Patrick/NY
3/5/2010 2:47:25 PM (3290 views)
Re: ProTitle USA - Josh Johnson/FL
3/5/2010 4:24:07 PM (3359 views)

Workmans Comp and Abstractors - . APS/NY
9/2/2008 10:36:23 PM (3199 views)
Re: Workmans Comp and Abstractors - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/3/2008 4:09:03 AM (3548 views)
Re: Workmans Comp and Abstractors - Robert Franco/OH
9/3/2008 10:48:58 AM (3331 views)
Re: Workmans Comp and Abstractors - Manager . /NY
9/3/2008 12:43:10 PM (3359 views)
Re: Workmans Comp and Abstractors - Stephen Heidorn/NY
9/8/2008 11:06:02 AM (3239 views)
Re: Workmans Comp and Abstractors - Alix Ott/MI
9/9/2008 5:45:16 PM (3226 views)

Clear Vision Grand Rapids Michigan - Robin Ramberg/MI
9/2/2008 9:43:27 PM (3293 views)
Re: Clear Vision Grand Rapids Michigan - charles jetter/OH
9/3/2008 7:54:40 AM (3607 views)
Re: Clear Vision Grand Rapids Michigan - RACHEL LALLMAN/OH
9/8/2008 9:58:56 AM (3407 views)

american abstract - Robin Ramberg/MI
9/2/2008 9:40:15 PM (3576 views)
Re: american abstract - Matt Papsch/MD
9/9/2008 9:26:56 PM (3274 views)
Re: american abstract - Constance Foye/VA
1/13/2009 10:02:13 AM (3031 views)


<< get older messagesget newer messages >>

DISCLAIMER: These Message Forums are un-moderated and Source of Title does not endorse the content of any of the posts. Source of Title discourages libelous comments and you, as the sole creator of the content, take full responsibility for your remarks.
Directory

The Source of Title Business directory has 8956 listed companies.

Leave feedback on a company:
SOT ID #:  learn more...
DRN Title Search
Blogs

Read other users' blogs-- or start your own!

Most Recent Blog Posts:

Creative Ways Millennials and Gen Z Are Approaching Homeownership
Marissa Berends's Blog
2025/07/02
0 comments

How Another War in the Middle East Could Impact the Housing Market
Marissa Berends's Blog
2025/06/30
0 comments

The Aging of the American Homebuyer: A 40-Year Shift and Its Economic Impact
Marissa Berends's Blog
2025/06/20
0 comments

Articles

Source of Title articles help to keep you informed on the state of the title industry.

NAR Pending Home Sales Report Reveals 1.8% Increase in May
"Consistent job gains and rising wages are modestly helping the housing market," said NAR Chief Economist Lawrence Yun. ...
Mortgage Applications Increase in Latest MBA Weekly Survey
“The combination of the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, current economic conditions, and last week’s FO...
Elevated Rates, Challenging Affordability Conditions Put a Damper on New Home Sales
“Housing affordability conditions have pushed more buyers to the sidelines, as reflected in our latest builder sur...
Title Resources Group Appoints Natasha Branch as Underwriting Counsel for North Carolina
Title Resources Group, one of the nation's leading title insurance underwriters, is pleased to welcome Natasha Branch as...
ZOCCAM, U.S. Bank and Stewart Title launch solution for faster, more secure title payments with Request for Payment
"Real Time ZOCCAM’s use of Request for Pay is combatting wire fraud by removing the need to send or receive wiring...

Search Articles:
browse...

Classifieds

Buy, sell, or trade! Browse the ads or post your own!

© 2020, Source of Title.