Register
Log In
Forget your Password?

Home
Directory
Bulletins
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Links
Classifieds
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
FAQ
Privacy Policy


Discussion
<< get older messagesget newer messages >>
to post a message: login - or - register | search messages | hide all replies



No pay from Jacqueline Battle - mollie cardell/SC
2/15/2008 3:32:02 PM (3212 views)
Re: No pay from Jacqueline Battle - Wendi See/SC
2/16/2008 11:46:15 AM (4165 views)
Re: No pay from Jacqueline Battle - george Hubka/MI
2/19/2008 10:13:00 PM (3813 views)

Input on Paridise Settlement - Debbie Thibodeaux/LA
2/15/2008 10:27:02 AM (3096 views)
Re: Input on Paridise Settlement - James Mohrmann/VA
2/19/2008 10:41:49 AM (3867 views)

Absolute Property Services - Rob/NY
2/13/2008 2:52:52 PM (3528 views)
Re: Absolute Property Services - Kevin Ahern/CT
2/13/2008 4:24:29 PM (4066 views)
Re: Absolute Property Services - Jay Duncan/MO
2/14/2008 1:19:16 PM (4093 views)
Re: Absolute Property Services - Carol Smith-Baker/MD
2/20/2008 11:38:37 AM (4301 views)
Re: Absolute Property Services - Donna D'Amore/PA
2/19/2008 10:18:51 AM (3908 views)
Re: Absolute Property Services - Kevin Ahern/CT
2/19/2008 11:57:05 AM (3847 views)
Re: Absolute Property Services - David Lederman/NY
2/19/2008 1:53:41 PM (4167 views)
Re: Absolute Property Services - James "Lin" Toney/MS
2/19/2008 11:53:42 PM (4126 views)
Re: Absolute Property Services - Wayne Schutt II/NY
2/22/2008 8:21:05 AM (4256 views)
Re: Absolute Property Services - Phil McLean/CO
2/19/2008 5:26:48 PM (4044 views)
Re: Absolute Property Services - Scott Perry/PA
2/19/2008 8:11:27 PM (4103 views)
Re: Absolute Property Services - Rob/NY
2/20/2008 7:58:18 AM (4186 views)
Re: Absolute Property Services - Loretta Reed/MD
2/20/2008 9:32:36 AM (4377 views)
Re: Absolute Property Services - President President/NY
2/20/2008 3:13:53 PM (4560 views)
Re: Absolute Property Services - Loretta Reed/MD
2/20/2008 4:43:33 PM (4292 views)
Re: Absolute Property Services - Wayne Schutt II/NY
2/22/2008 8:18:47 AM (4108 views)
Re: Absolute Property Services - Donna D'Amore/PA
2/26/2008 12:56:22 PM (4147 views)
Re: Absolute Property Services update - Phil McLean/CO
3/3/2008 4:03:28 PM (4157 views)

SAFEGUARD TITLE - john franz/NJ
2/13/2008 2:04:59 PM (6484 views)
Re: SAFEGUARD TITLE - thomas reale/NY
2/19/2008 5:23:42 PM (4874 views)
Re: SAFEGUARD TITLE - Mark Russomanno/NJ
3/3/2008 6:34:37 PM (4414 views)
Re: SAFEGUARD TITLE - STEVE MEINECKE/TN
3/4/2008 11:31:14 AM (4286 views)

searchlight abstract - denise davenport/NY
2/12/2008 3:13:33 PM (3484 views)
Re: searchlight abstract - george Hubka/MI
2/12/2008 3:30:33 PM (4102 views)
Re: searchlight abstract - Natalie Collier/NY
2/12/2008 8:18:17 PM (4172 views)
Re: searchlight abstract - /NY
2/15/2008 10:13:05 AM (4036 views)
Re: searchlight abstract - Jessica Talley/NJ
2/15/2008 10:15:39 AM (4115 views)
Re: searchlight abstract - Jessica Talley/NJ
2/13/2008 10:31:38 AM (3975 views)
Re: searchlight abstract - Kevin Ahern/CT
2/13/2008 11:20:45 AM (3893 views)
Re: searchlight abstract - Jessica Talley/NJ
2/13/2008 4:09:08 PM (3835 views)
Re: searchlight abstract - george Hubka/MI
2/19/2008 10:24:36 PM (3996 views)
Re: searchlight abstract - James "Lin" Toney/MS
2/20/2008 12:35:32 AM (3846 views)
Re: searchlight abstract - Debra Janssen/NY
2/17/2008 8:51:59 PM (4050 views)


Real Title Services


Best Rural Counties for Quality of Life - David Bloys/TX
2/12/2008 11:12:25 AM (3689 views)

ActiveRain - KELLY ROBERTSON/CA
2/11/2008 10:50:12 AM (3969 views)

Don't do work for The Bertrum Group! - Chloe Niglio/PA
2/11/2008 10:11:40 AM (3542 views)
Re: Don't do work for The Bertrum Group! - george Hubka/MI
2/11/2008 4:53:17 PM (4081 views)
Re: Don't do work for The Bertrum Group! - Donna D'Amore/PA
2/19/2008 9:37:23 AM (4040 views)
Re: Don't do work for The Bertrum Group! - Cate Jones/NH
2/19/2008 9:55:13 AM (3972 views)
Re: Don't do work for The Bertrum Group! - george Hubka/MI
2/19/2008 10:32:25 PM (4087 views)
Re: Don't do work for The Bertrum Group! - Donna D'Amore/PA
2/20/2008 12:01:55 PM (4334 views)
Re: Don't do work for The Bertrum Group! - george Hubka/MI
2/24/2008 9:28:07 PM (4279 views)
Re: Don't do work for The Bertrum Group! - Chloe Niglio/PA
2/25/2008 9:14:47 AM (4266 views)
Re: Don't do work for The Bertrum Group! - Kevin Ahern/CT
2/25/2008 9:28:08 AM (4166 views)
Re: Don't do work for The Bertrum Group! - george Hubka/MI
2/25/2008 4:15:41 PM (4141 views)
Re: Don't do work for The Bertrum Group! - Chloe Niglio/PA
2/25/2008 4:29:02 PM (4137 views)
Re: Don't do work for The Bertrum Group! - george Hubka/MI
2/25/2008 7:48:23 PM (4319 views)
Re: Don't do work for The Bertrum Group! - Kevin Ahern/CT
2/26/2008 9:02:23 AM (4247 views)
Guys, I think we need to step back and count to ten. Time to let cooler heads prevail.

In answer to your question...I do sue Defendants on principal. If they can be sued in small claims court (provided there is small claims jurisdiction ) I do so. It is only a $35.00 filing fee, and I get that back if I win. In many collection cases the Defendant is defaulted for failure to file either an appearance or failure to file an answer/defenses. In this case a judgment after default enters, and very often does not require either party to appear in court (depends on the district). The Defendant would have 4 months to reopen, but they rarely due. If they do,  they are required to come into court to defend.

If the small claims court does not have jurisdiction, it becomes necessary to file in the Superior Court .Connecticut's filing fee is $225.00 plus marshal's fee for service of process which are awarded to the Plaintiff if he wins. If the Defendant is located in Connecticut, you have pretty much the same case scenario as stated above for default and judgment. However, there may be some more formal motions for default and judgment to be filed. The forms for these motions are readily available in the local law library.

If the Defendant is not located in Connecticut it becomes necessary to make a choice as to whether to sue the defendant in Connecticut or the Defendant's native state. In my case the choice is usually determined by the amount of the damages sought in the suit. If the damages are $3,000.00 to $4,000.00 or less,  I probably would initiate the suit in Connecticut, and rely on Connecticut's long arm statute to effectuate jurisdiction over the Defendant. The long arm jurisdiction would almost certainly be challenged by a motion to dismiss. This is a dispositive motion, and as a matter of right I can require the Defendant to appear,  and argue the motion. However, it would cost the Defendant far more to hire an attorney, draft the motion and argue the motion than it would cost to pay me.

If the damages sought were greater than $4,000.00 I would sue the Defendant in his native state, and proceed to trial. It would certainly worth my while to travel to the other state for trial. Most of the pleadings could be filed via U.S. mail. There is no need to rely on long arm jurisdiction, and there would be no challenge to the suit on that basis.

to post a reply: login - or - register


Re: Don't do work for The Bertrum Group! - Chloe Niglio/PA
2/26/2008 3:11:27 PM (4188 views)
Re: Don't do work for The Bertrum Group! - Scott Perry/PA
2/26/2008 8:58:59 PM (4421 views)
Re: Don't do work for The Bertrum Group! - george Hubka/MI
2/27/2008 10:32:13 AM (4043 views)
Re: Don't do work for The Bertrum Group! - Scott Perry/PA
2/27/2008 4:22:31 PM (4086 views)
Re: Don't do work for The Bertrum Group! - J Nisonger/CA
2/25/2008 7:16:49 PM (4172 views)
Re: Don't do work for The Bertrum Group! - george Hubka/MI
2/25/2008 7:43:35 PM (4233 views)
Re: Don't do work for The Bertrum Group! - J Nisonger/CA
2/25/2008 8:01:55 PM (4259 views)
Re: Don't do work for The Bertrum Group! - george Hubka/MI
2/26/2008 9:03:13 PM (4317 views)
Re: Don't do work for The Bertrum Group! - Chloe Niglio/PA
2/27/2008 9:31:11 AM (4138 views)
Re: Don't do work for The Bertrum Group! - george Hubka/MI
2/27/2008 10:31:00 AM (4074 views)

How to get County to comply with their own rules - Constance Foye/VA
2/9/2008 12:16:55 PM (2915 views)
Re: How to get County to comply with their own rules - Robert Franco/OH
2/9/2008 2:09:44 PM (3797 views)
Re: How to get County to comply with their own rules - STEVE MEINECKE/TN
2/9/2008 5:15:55 PM (3833 views)
Re: How to get County to comply with their own rules - Constance Foye/VA
2/10/2008 7:58:03 PM (3487 views)
Re: How to get County to comply with their own rules - STEVE MEINECKE/TN
2/10/2008 9:49:25 PM (3707 views)
Re: How to get County to comply with their own rules - William Pattison /CA
2/11/2008 11:45:16 AM (3568 views)
Re: How to get County to comply with their own rules - Janice/OH
2/14/2008 10:18:40 PM (3647 views)
Re: How to get County to comply with their own rules - Shannon Blatt/VA
2/25/2008 11:00:43 PM (3928 views)
Re: How to get County to comply with their own rules - William Pattison /CA
3/18/2008 5:35:13 PM (3861 views)

Texas Town For Sale - David Bloys/TX
2/8/2008 3:29:00 PM (3806 views)

Another Title Company Ceasing Pittsburgh Operation - Jason Sheppard/PA
2/8/2008 2:48:37 PM (3662 views)
Re: Another Title Company Ceasing Pittsburgh Operation - Laurie E/MD
2/10/2008 4:01:49 PM (4167 views)
Re: Another Title Company Ceasing Pittsburgh Operation - christine /MA
2/11/2008 6:52:49 PM (4178 views)
Re: Another Title Company Ceasing Pittsburgh Operation - Jack Johanson/PA
2/13/2008 10:09:43 AM (4130 views)
Re: Another Title Company Ceasing Pittsburgh Operation - george Hubka/MI
2/19/2008 10:34:19 PM (3965 views)
Re: Another Title Company Ceasing Pittsburgh Operation - Jack Johanson/PA
2/20/2008 4:29:25 PM (4330 views)
Re: Another Title Company Ceasing Pittsburgh Operation - Jason Sheppard/PA
2/21/2008 11:19:20 AM (4084 views)
Re: Another Title Company Ceasing Pittsburgh Operation - Marian Littleton/VA
3/2/2008 8:46:27 PM (4223 views)

Absolute Title Revisited - James "Lin" Toney/MS
2/7/2008 8:23:06 PM (3534 views)
Re: Absolute Title Revisited - Kevin Ahern/CT
2/8/2008 12:06:02 PM (4242 views)
Re: Absolute Title Revisited - James "Lin" Toney/MS
2/9/2008 8:19:33 AM (3981 views)
Re: Absolute Title Revisited - Kevin Ahern/CT
2/9/2008 8:38:16 AM (3946 views)
Re: Absolute Title Revisited - James "Lin" Toney/MS
2/9/2008 7:25:28 PM (3956 views)
Re: Absolute Title Revisited - Marcus Magee/NY
2/12/2008 10:51:05 AM (3798 views)
Re: Absolute Title Revisited - James "Lin" Toney/MS
2/12/2008 6:11:22 PM (3844 views)
Re: Absolute Title Revisited - Lynn Miller/PA
2/12/2008 7:28:04 PM (3698 views)
Re: Absolute Title Revisited - Nils Nelson/ME
2/12/2008 10:53:14 PM (4098 views)
Re: Absolute Title Revisited - James "Lin" Toney/MS
2/13/2008 7:28:25 AM (3756 views)
Re: Absolute Title Revisited - Wayne Schutt II/NY
2/13/2008 2:50:46 PM (3712 views)
Re: Absolute Title Revisited - Kevin Ahern/CT
2/13/2008 4:13:29 PM (3658 views)
Re: Absolute Title Revisited - Wayne Schutt II/NY
2/14/2008 6:41:03 AM (3789 views)
Re: Absolute Title Revisited - Wayne Schutt II/NY
2/15/2008 3:55:55 PM (3718 views)
Re: Absolute Title Revisited - george Hubka/MI
2/19/2008 10:39:55 PM (3681 views)
Re: Absolute Title Revisited - Scott Perry/PA
2/20/2008 12:02:42 AM (3737 views)
Re: Absolute Title Revisited - James "Lin" Toney/MS
2/20/2008 12:43:33 AM (3751 views)
Re: Absolute Title Revisited - Scott Perry/PA
2/20/2008 6:52:51 AM (3867 views)
Re: Absolute Title Revisited - James "Lin" Toney/MS
2/20/2008 9:10:35 AM (4136 views)
Re: Absolute Title Revisited - Scott Perry/PA
2/20/2008 4:49:12 PM (3944 views)
Re: Absolute Title Revisited - Kevin Ahern/CT
2/20/2008 7:42:03 AM (3838 views)
Re: Absolute Title Revisited - NANCY WALLACE/NJ
2/19/2008 9:19:57 AM (3626 views)
Re: Absolute Title Revisited - george Hubka/MI
2/19/2008 10:41:45 PM (3651 views)
Re: Absolute Title Revisited - ARTHUR LIPPMAN/MA
2/13/2008 11:52:51 AM (3813 views)
Re: Absolute Title Revisited - Wayne Schutt II/NY
2/13/2008 2:45:35 PM (3623 views)
Re: Absolute Title Revisited - James "Lin" Toney/MS
2/13/2008 10:42:38 PM (3834 views)
Re: Absolute Title Revisited - Wayne Schutt II/NY
2/14/2008 6:42:14 AM (3666 views)

Outstanding invoice - Cate Jones/NH
2/7/2008 11:26:01 AM (3227 views)
Re: Outstanding invoice - Sheila Sten/PA
2/7/2008 2:29:57 PM (4013 views)
Re: Outstanding invoice - Jason Sheppard/PA
2/8/2008 2:50:36 PM (4031 views)
Re: Outstanding invoice - Jason Sheppard/PA
2/8/2008 2:53:49 PM (5625 views)
Re: Outstanding invoice - Cate Jones/NH
2/11/2008 9:09:27 AM (3728 views)
Re: Outstanding invoice - george Hubka/MI
2/11/2008 4:57:01 PM (3662 views)
Re: Outstanding invoice - Cate Jones/NH
2/12/2008 10:02:33 AM (3651 views)
Re: Outstanding invoice - Cate Jones/NH
2/12/2008 10:00:13 AM (3573 views)
Re: Outstanding invoice - george Hubka/MI
2/12/2008 3:39:22 PM (3426 views)
Re: Outstanding invoice - Cate Jones/NH
2/19/2008 9:51:24 AM (3739 views)
Re: Outstanding invoice - Chloe Niglio/PA
2/26/2008 3:22:58 PM (4064 views)
Re: Outstanding invoice - Jean Allen/NC
2/26/2008 6:21:32 PM (3985 views)
Re: Outstanding invoice - J Nisonger/CA
2/26/2008 6:22:36 PM (4019 views)
Re: Outstanding invoice - george Hubka/MI
2/26/2008 9:10:40 PM (3979 views)
Re: Outstanding invoice - J Nisonger/CA
2/27/2008 2:35:03 AM (3914 views)
Re: Outstanding invoice - george Hubka/MI
2/27/2008 10:33:47 AM (3873 views)

Looking for E and O - Joseph Aviles/NY
2/7/2008 6:28:03 AM (2317 views)

We're Getting Noticed! - Scott Perry/PA
2/6/2008 10:56:31 PM (4343 views)
Re: We're Getting Noticed! - Anita Backlund/MN
2/6/2008 11:56:48 PM (3914 views)
Re: We're Getting Noticed! - Diane Cipa/PA
2/8/2008 2:40:55 PM (3871 views)
Re: We're Getting Noticed! - Scott Perry/PA
2/11/2008 12:44:18 AM (3473 views)
Re: We're Getting Noticed! - Scott Perry/PA
2/11/2008 12:40:37 AM (3606 views)
Re: We're Getting Noticed! - Shaking Head/NY
2/15/2008 10:18:42 AM (3580 views)
Re: We're Getting Noticed! - Scott Perry/PA
2/15/2008 4:47:49 PM (3693 views)
Re: We're Getting Noticed! - J Nisonger/CA
2/16/2008 1:50:10 PM (3610 views)
Re: We're Getting Noticed! - Scott Perry/PA
2/17/2008 12:57:48 AM (3622 views)
Re: We're Getting Noticed! - J Nisonger/CA
2/18/2008 8:26:32 PM (3645 views)
Re: We're Getting Noticed! - Scott Perry/PA
2/18/2008 11:15:42 PM (3661 views)


<< get older messagesget newer messages >>

DISCLAIMER: These Message Forums are un-moderated and Source of Title does not endorse the content of any of the posts. Source of Title discourages libelous comments and you, as the sole creator of the content, take full responsibility for your remarks.
Directory

The Source of Title Business directory has 8961 listed companies.

Leave feedback on a company:
SOT ID #:  learn more...
DRN Title Search
Blogs

Read other users' blogs-- or start your own!

Most Recent Blog Posts:

Shared Driveway Agreements
Marissa Berends's Blog
2025/12/10
0 comments

Explain It Like I’m 5: FIRPTA Edition
Marissa Berends's Blog
2025/12/03
0 comments

Home buyers are more active this fall.....
Michael Stelzer's Blog
2025/11/27
0 comments

Articles

Source of Title articles help to keep you informed on the state of the title industry.

National Association of REALTORS® Unveils Top 10 Homebuying Hot Spots for 2026
"Lower mortgage rates and larger inventory will attract buyers back to the market in 2026," said NAR Chief Economist Law...
Commercial and Multifamily Mortgage Delinquency Rates Mixed in Third-Quarter 2025
“Commercial mortgage delinquencies increased for CMBS and GSE loans in the third quarter and decreased slightly fo...
MISMO Calls for Industry Professionals to Join the New Technology Impact and Enablement Community of Practice
“The mortgage industry is evolving rapidly as technology drives modernization,” said Shawn Jobe, Vice Presid...
Utility Costs, Indoor Air Quality, and Energy Efficiency Drive Commercial Real Estate Sustainability Decisions
"Commercial real estate agents recognize the importance of sustainability when purchasing, leasing, or selling propertie...
Mortgage Applications Decrease in Latest MBA Weekly Survey
“Mortgage rates moved lower in line with Treasury yields, which declined on data showing a weaker labor market and...

Search Articles:
browse...

Classifieds

Buy, sell, or trade! Browse the ads or post your own!

© 2020, Source of Title.