AbstractorPro (Real Title Services)
Register
Log In
Forget your Password?

Home
Directory
Bulletins
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Links
Classifieds
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
FAQ
Privacy Policy


Discussion
<< get older messagesget newer messages >>
to post a message: login - or - register | search messages | hide all replies



Proposing A Ratings Bonanza! - Jason Sheppard/PA
11/1/2005 1:47:40 PM (3182 views)

First Merit Settlement Services, Inc...... - Matt Papsch/MD
10/31/2005 4:02:57 PM (3012 views)
Re: First Merit Settlement Services, Inc...... - Annette Dorty/PA
10/31/2005 6:36:32 PM (3734 views)
Re: First Merit Settlement Services, Inc...... - Kurt deVries/FL
11/1/2005 11:03:33 AM (3741 views)
Re: First Merit Settlement Services, Inc...... - Laurie E/MD
11/1/2005 4:25:18 PM (3537 views)
Re: First Merit Settlement Services, Inc...... - Matt Papsch/MD
11/1/2005 10:52:12 PM (3485 views)

You mean I have to pay for it?? - Robert Franco/OH
10/31/2005 1:25:11 PM (2699 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Matthew DeLand/NY
10/31/2005 1:39:14 PM (3792 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - David Nixon/MA
10/31/2005 4:56:47 PM (3619 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Rachel Malone/PA
11/1/2005 7:18:01 AM (3469 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Kevin Ahern/CT
11/1/2005 8:25:04 AM (3622 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Kurt deVries/FL
11/1/2005 11:00:56 AM (3538 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Kelli Gorman/TX
11/1/2005 12:59:42 PM (3557 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - David Nixon/MA
11/1/2005 2:27:05 PM (3555 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - george Hubka/MI
11/3/2005 5:37:02 AM (3514 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Kelli Gorman/TX
11/6/2005 1:39:05 AM (3506 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - george Hubka/MI
11/3/2005 5:24:23 AM (3464 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 1:40:35 PM (3469 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Phyllis Agan/GA
11/5/2005 1:00:14 PM (3462 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Scott Perry/PA
11/5/2005 3:11:22 PM (3530 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - David Bloys/TX
11/5/2005 6:24:53 PM (3498 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Scott Perry/PA
11/5/2005 10:12:02 PM (3559 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - David Bloys/TX
11/6/2005 8:39:14 AM (3514 views)

Red Vision article on SOT - Donna Grady/NC
10/30/2005 1:05:13 AM (3068 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/30/2005 6:03:27 AM (3759 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 9:55:34 AM (3757 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/30/2005 11:01:49 AM (3722 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/30/2005 11:10:18 AM (3687 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Jan Forster/NC
10/30/2005 11:20:44 AM (3721 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 11:57:34 AM (3735 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 11:47:41 AM (3500 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 11:40:40 AM (5171 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/30/2005 12:26:09 PM (3755 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 12:56:30 PM (3824 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Donna Grady/NC
10/30/2005 10:07:33 PM (3632 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 10:42:07 PM (3659 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Matthew DeLand/NY
10/31/2005 1:25:57 PM (3616 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Robert Franco/OH
10/31/2005 1:59:55 PM (3773 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Matthew DeLand/NY
10/31/2005 2:44:27 PM (3856 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Jan Forster/NC
10/31/2005 3:01:15 PM (3599 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/31/2005 11:07:46 PM (3494 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Kevin Ahern/CT
11/2/2005 7:52:40 AM (3534 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Michaela Urban/OH
11/3/2005 1:48:08 PM (3403 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Kevin Ahern/CT
11/3/2005 3:49:00 PM (3403 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Michaela Urban/OH
11/3/2005 10:06:55 PM (3525 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 11:57:20 PM (3403 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Barbara Bennett/IN
11/4/2005 3:07:08 PM (3533 views)

TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/29/2005 12:25:52 PM (2919 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/29/2005 1:58:01 PM (3640 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/29/2005 3:46:53 PM (3562 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - monica froese/ME
10/29/2005 9:07:18 PM (3725 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/29/2005 10:02:46 PM (3638 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Jason Sheppard/PA
10/30/2005 2:46:39 AM (5510 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - J.T. Shoemaker/NY
10/30/2005 7:36:04 PM (3699 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - george Hubka/MI
10/31/2005 7:42:19 AM (3688 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Jason Sheppard/PA
10/31/2005 11:17:12 AM (3991 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/31/2005 6:39:59 PM (3540 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/31/2005 9:32:44 PM (3619 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/31/2005 9:20:01 PM (3580 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/31/2005 9:44:44 PM (3583 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/31/2005 9:25:59 PM (3525 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - J.T. Shoemaker/NY
11/1/2005 6:02:23 PM (3497 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
11/1/2005 7:47:31 PM (3452 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Tammy Knight/MO
11/1/2005 11:05:20 PM (3488 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Tammy Knight/MO
11/1/2005 11:10:38 PM (3473 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
11/2/2005 7:47:20 AM (3484 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Jason Sheppard/PA
11/2/2005 3:06:05 PM (3550 views)


Real Title Services


e-mail solicitation - christine/MA
10/28/2005 2:40:31 PM (2654 views)
Re: e-mail solicitation - Robert Franco/OH
10/28/2005 2:58:15 PM (3570 views)
Re: e-mail solicitation - Jacqueline Quaresimo/PA
10/29/2005 3:20:56 PM (3493 views)
Re: e-mail solicitation - Jason Sheppard/PA
10/30/2005 3:13:40 AM (3510 views)

QUESTION FOR F. LEE... - Scott Perry/PA
10/27/2005 5:28:13 PM (2634 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR F. LEE... - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/27/2005 7:00:49 PM (3613 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR F. LEE... - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/28/2005 6:33:17 AM (3699 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR F. LEE... - Jay Duncan/MO
10/28/2005 8:32:35 AM (3670 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR F. LEE... - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/28/2005 9:34:25 AM (3678 views)

C2C - Smitty Strickland/SC
10/27/2005 5:02:32 PM (2735 views)
Re: C2C - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/27/2005 5:24:29 PM (3853 views)
Re: C2C - Smitty Strickland/SC
10/27/2005 6:57:18 PM (3851 views)
Re: C2C - Anne Gilbert/VT
10/30/2005 10:35:27 AM (4102 views)
Re: C2C - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/30/2005 11:02:38 AM (3811 views)
Re: C2C - Jan Forster/NC
10/30/2005 11:16:02 AM (3799 views)
Re: C2C - Barbara Bennett/IN
10/30/2005 7:04:52 PM (3975 views)

The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
10/27/2005 3:04:25 PM (3062 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
10/27/2005 5:01:27 PM (3825 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - george Hubka/MI
10/27/2005 8:19:11 PM (3877 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
10/27/2005 11:36:45 PM (3875 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - LAWANDA MCMILLIAN/AR
10/28/2005 9:04:13 AM (3891 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
10/28/2005 11:55:35 AM (3939 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jason Sheppard/PA
10/30/2005 3:36:45 AM (3855 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Scott Perry/PA
10/30/2005 8:28:20 AM (3818 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
10/30/2005 4:15:44 PM (5813 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jason Sheppard/PA
10/31/2005 11:18:07 AM (3953 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/31/2005 6:53:37 PM (3868 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
11/1/2005 10:00:35 AM (3863 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Tammy Knight/MO
11/1/2005 11:33:33 PM (3818 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - J Nisonger/CA
11/2/2005 4:42:30 AM (3804 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
11/2/2005 9:41:53 AM (5539 views)

Tammy,

There was a long hard discussion when NALTEA was being set up on who was going to be allowed to join, mainly based on years of experience.  In the end it was decided and accepted at the first conference that an abstractor, reguardless of experience could join, provided they fulfill the other membership requirements.  That is also why there are four different types of membership.  Please read the Code of Regulations http://www.naltea.org/code_of_regulations.pdf and you will see that to be a full member 70% of your income must come from abstract/title searching, etc...

NALTEA was not set up to oversee or run anyones business and not every member will agree on what NALTEA supports or does.  It would be pie-in-the-sky thinking if thought ever crossed anyone's mind.  Please read the mission statement of NALTEA in that same link.

NALTEA is an association that shows the industry that we, as abstractors, a) exist
 
b) care about what direction the industry is taking.

c) care about the training, or lack of training, that exist.

d) cares about how abstract work affects the consumer.

There is a Code of Ethics that you can view at http://www.naltea.org/ethics.pdf.  Those are the ethics that NALTEA goes by.  If someone believes those ethics have been violated then report it.  It is not an ethics violation just because one does not agree with a business approach.  NALTEA encourges people to step it up to the next notch.  NALTEA is not here to punish people.

Next there is another step in NALTEA to set one's self apart from other abstractors and that is the NALTEA Certification Program.  A lot of people have worked very hard on this and we are nearing the final review for this process.

Back to your questions:
The one thing that keeps our small biz from joining, is the fact that there doesn't seem to be any screening process for who you accept It's not so much what can NALTEA do for our company, but is my company going to rise a notch respectfully by being a member; because other companies know that not just anyone can get in.

Yes there is a screening process as outlined on the application and the Codie of Regulations.  Your statement reflects, yes you want something out it.  How can any company look down on you for joining an association that wants to improve abstractors and their part of the industry as a whole.

Are you going to not accept renewals from members that do exactly what NALTEA discourages and so on. If I join something, I want it to be deserved.

As long a member follows the Code of Regulations and Code of Ethics.  Again this goes back to abstractors are not going to agree on everything.

Has NALTEA ever turned anyone away or not let them renew their membership??  

As of this date NALTEA has not had to turn down any application that has been sent in.  Most abstractors that look to join NALTEA have good intentions.

If you are looking for an excuse not to join, there are a million of them.  There were a million of excuses not to put NALTEA together in the first place. 

But, there was a need to put NALTEA together and there is a need for abstractors to join NALTEA is they want to see any kind of positive change in the industry for abstractors and the consumer.

I hope I answered your questions.

Jay Duncan

to post a reply: login - or - register


Re: The Future of the Industry - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 3:15:16 AM (3861 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
11/3/2005 10:08:57 AM (5558 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
11/3/2005 10:51:28 AM (3869 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
11/3/2005 11:05:37 AM (3805 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Patrick Scott/IL
11/3/2005 12:09:46 PM (3771 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 12:58:57 PM (3730 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Patrick Scott/IL
11/3/2005 1:51:58 PM (3789 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
11/3/2005 2:16:46 PM (3744 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Langdon Knight/MO
11/3/2005 5:31:39 PM (3788 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Langdon Knight/MO
11/3/2005 5:31:40 PM (3734 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Langdon Knight/MO
11/3/2005 5:34:10 PM (3762 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
11/3/2005 5:09:11 PM (3771 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 5:42:30 PM (3713 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
11/3/2005 6:01:28 PM (3680 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 6:29:59 PM (3761 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Douglas Gallant/OH
11/3/2005 6:52:44 PM (3750 views)

Electronic storage - Deborah Manion/VA
10/27/2005 9:58:43 AM (2627 views)
Re: Electronic storage - Jay Duncan/MO
10/27/2005 10:16:46 AM (5398 views)
Re: Electronic storage - David Bloys/TX
10/27/2005 12:10:20 PM (5519 views)
Re: Electronic storage - Robert Franco/OH
10/27/2005 12:10:48 PM (5389 views)
Re: Electronic storage - Jay Duncan/MO
10/27/2005 12:17:05 PM (3737 views)
Re: Electronic storage - David Bloys/TX
10/27/2005 12:24:20 PM (3732 views)
Re: Electronic storage - Robert Franco/OH
10/27/2005 1:05:46 PM (5777 views)
Re: Electronic storage - Deborah Manion/VA
10/27/2005 3:58:05 PM (3696 views)

Starting your own business - Angela Glass/MD
10/25/2005 8:49:48 PM (2804 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Jay Duncan/MO
10/25/2005 9:10:51 PM (5347 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Loretta Reed/MD
10/26/2005 8:18:36 AM (4041 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Angela Glass/MD
10/26/2005 9:05:53 AM (3860 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/26/2005 11:24:06 AM (3916 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Kurt deVries/FL
10/26/2005 3:40:05 PM (3898 views)
Re: Starting your own business - george Hubka/MI
10/27/2005 8:31:07 PM (3882 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Kurt deVries/FL
10/28/2005 11:26:19 AM (3863 views)

Passing... - Jay Duncan/MO
10/24/2005 3:24:08 PM (2768 views)
Re: Passing... - Scott Perry/PA
10/24/2005 5:07:51 PM (3886 views)
Re: Passing... - Kurt deVries/FL
10/25/2005 11:04:13 AM (3791 views)

Abstractors Aid In New Orleans' Recovery - Jarrod Clabaugh/OH
10/24/2005 10:19:12 AM (3737 views)
Re: Abstractors Aid In New Orleans' Recovery - Heather St. Amant/LA
11/14/2005 7:59:00 PM (3836 views)
Re: Abstractors Aid In New Orleans' Recovery - James "Lin" Toney/MS
11/14/2005 9:16:55 PM (3890 views)

Hey Kurt! - J Nisonger/CA
10/24/2005 12:06:20 AM (2748 views)
Re: Hey Kurt! - Kurt deVries/FL
10/24/2005 9:37:58 AM (4153 views)
Re: Hey Kurt! - J Nisonger/CA
10/25/2005 10:43:14 PM (4055 views)
Re: Hey Kurt! - Kurt deVries/FL
10/26/2005 9:31:29 AM (4036 views)

Whine, whine, whine... - Jay Duncan/MO
10/23/2005 10:43:57 PM (3910 views)
Re: Whine, whine, whine... - Jay Duncan/MO
10/23/2005 10:48:42 PM (4242 views)
Re: Whine, whine, whine... - Langdon Knight/MO
10/24/2005 1:26:33 AM (4216 views)
Re: Whine, whine, whine... - Deborah Manion/VA
10/24/2005 9:20:18 AM (4249 views)
Re: Whine, whine, whine... - Patrick Scott/IL
10/24/2005 11:23:40 AM (4183 views)
Re: Whine, whine, whine... - Scott Perry/PA
10/24/2005 9:33:41 PM (4191 views)
Re: Whine, whine, whine... - Patrick Scott/IL
10/24/2005 10:45:40 PM (4179 views)


<< get older messagesget newer messages >>

DISCLAIMER: These Message Forums are un-moderated and Source of Title does not endorse the content of any of the posts. Source of Title discourages libelous comments and you, as the sole creator of the content, take full responsibility for your remarks.
Directory

The Source of Title Business directory has 8917 listed companies.

Leave feedback on a company:
SOT ID #:  learn more...
DRN Title Search
Blogs

Read other users' blogs-- or start your own!

Most Recent Blog Posts:

Unveiling the Costs: Why Commercial Title Searches Command a Premium
Security American's Blog
2024/04/17
0 comments

Protecting Your Home: The Ins and Outs of Deed Theft and How to Shield Yourself
Security American's Blog
2024/03/21
0 comments

Exploring the Implications of Eliminating Mandatory Title Insurance
Security American's Blog
2024/03/11
0 comments

Articles

Source of Title articles help to keep you informed on the state of the title industry.

Families Must Spend 38% of Their Income on Mortgage Payments, New NAHB Index Shows
“The Cost of Housing Index clearly shows that a growing shortage of affordable housing is hurting families and com...
New Home Sales in April Down on Higher Mortgage Rates
“A lack of homes in the resale market combined with softening of the median new home price should incentivize home...
Former title agent sentenced to 36 months in prison for $6.6 million mortgage fraud scheme
On May 22, a former title agent was sentenced to 36 months in federal prison and ordered to pay $6,634,750.00 in forfeit...
Fidelity National Financial Names Jason Nadeau As Chief Artificial Intelligence Officer
"FNF's overall technology vision has always included emerging technologies," said Mike Nolan, CEO of Fidelity National F...
Existing-Home Sales Retreated 1.9% in April
"Home sales changed little overall, but the upper-end market is experiencing a sizable gain due to more supply coming on...

Search Articles:
browse...

Classifieds

Buy, sell, or trade! Browse the ads or post your own!

© 2020, Source of Title.