AbstractorPro (Real Title Services)
Register
Log In
Forget your Password?

Home
Directory
Bulletins
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Links
Classifieds
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
FAQ
Privacy Policy


Discussion
<< get older messagesget newer messages >>
to post a message: login - or - register | search messages | hide all replies



First American - Tammy Knight/MO
11/1/2005 11:37:47 PM (2810 views)
Re: First American - Russ Frye/GA
11/7/2005 3:43:06 PM (3595 views)
Re: First American - J Nisonger/CA
11/13/2005 3:53:44 AM (3510 views)
Re: First American - terri hurst/NC
11/27/2005 10:22:53 AM (3650 views)

Proposing A Ratings Bonanza! - Jason Sheppard/PA
11/1/2005 1:47:40 PM (3199 views)

First Merit Settlement Services, Inc...... - Matt Papsch/MD
10/31/2005 4:02:57 PM (3021 views)
Re: First Merit Settlement Services, Inc...... - Annette Dorty/PA
10/31/2005 6:36:32 PM (3736 views)
Re: First Merit Settlement Services, Inc...... - Kurt deVries/FL
11/1/2005 11:03:33 AM (3746 views)
Re: First Merit Settlement Services, Inc...... - Laurie E/MD
11/1/2005 4:25:18 PM (3544 views)
Re: First Merit Settlement Services, Inc...... - Matt Papsch/MD
11/1/2005 10:52:12 PM (3489 views)

You mean I have to pay for it?? - Robert Franco/OH
10/31/2005 1:25:11 PM (2709 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Matthew DeLand/NY
10/31/2005 1:39:14 PM (3799 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - David Nixon/MA
10/31/2005 4:56:47 PM (3622 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Rachel Malone/PA
11/1/2005 7:18:01 AM (3477 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Kevin Ahern/CT
11/1/2005 8:25:04 AM (3629 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Kurt deVries/FL
11/1/2005 11:00:56 AM (3544 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Kelli Gorman/TX
11/1/2005 12:59:42 PM (3561 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - David Nixon/MA
11/1/2005 2:27:05 PM (3558 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - george Hubka/MI
11/3/2005 5:37:02 AM (3518 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Kelli Gorman/TX
11/6/2005 1:39:05 AM (3510 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - george Hubka/MI
11/3/2005 5:24:23 AM (3473 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 1:40:35 PM (3475 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Phyllis Agan/GA
11/5/2005 1:00:14 PM (3466 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Scott Perry/PA
11/5/2005 3:11:22 PM (3535 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - David Bloys/TX
11/5/2005 6:24:53 PM (3505 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Scott Perry/PA
11/5/2005 10:12:02 PM (3565 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - David Bloys/TX
11/6/2005 8:39:14 AM (3520 views)

Red Vision article on SOT - Donna Grady/NC
10/30/2005 1:05:13 AM (3072 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/30/2005 6:03:27 AM (3765 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 9:55:34 AM (3767 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/30/2005 11:01:49 AM (3726 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/30/2005 11:10:18 AM (3692 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Jan Forster/NC
10/30/2005 11:20:44 AM (3725 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 11:57:34 AM (3740 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 11:47:41 AM (3510 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 11:40:40 AM (5183 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/30/2005 12:26:09 PM (3762 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 12:56:30 PM (3830 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Donna Grady/NC
10/30/2005 10:07:33 PM (3642 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 10:42:07 PM (3667 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Matthew DeLand/NY
10/31/2005 1:25:57 PM (3621 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Robert Franco/OH
10/31/2005 1:59:55 PM (3776 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Matthew DeLand/NY
10/31/2005 2:44:27 PM (3860 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Jan Forster/NC
10/31/2005 3:01:15 PM (3603 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/31/2005 11:07:46 PM (3499 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Kevin Ahern/CT
11/2/2005 7:52:40 AM (3539 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Michaela Urban/OH
11/3/2005 1:48:08 PM (3405 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Kevin Ahern/CT
11/3/2005 3:49:00 PM (3405 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Michaela Urban/OH
11/3/2005 10:06:55 PM (3531 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 11:57:20 PM (3405 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Barbara Bennett/IN
11/4/2005 3:07:08 PM (3540 views)




TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/29/2005 12:25:52 PM (2927 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/29/2005 1:58:01 PM (3644 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/29/2005 3:46:53 PM (3565 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - monica froese/ME
10/29/2005 9:07:18 PM (3730 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/29/2005 10:02:46 PM (3641 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Jason Sheppard/PA
10/30/2005 2:46:39 AM (5520 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - J.T. Shoemaker/NY
10/30/2005 7:36:04 PM (3707 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - george Hubka/MI
10/31/2005 7:42:19 AM (3691 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Jason Sheppard/PA
10/31/2005 11:17:12 AM (3996 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/31/2005 6:39:59 PM (3549 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/31/2005 9:32:44 PM (3627 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/31/2005 9:20:01 PM (3584 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/31/2005 9:44:44 PM (3591 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/31/2005 9:25:59 PM (3528 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - J.T. Shoemaker/NY
11/1/2005 6:02:23 PM (3505 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
11/1/2005 7:47:31 PM (3459 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Tammy Knight/MO
11/1/2005 11:05:20 PM (3499 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Tammy Knight/MO
11/1/2005 11:10:38 PM (3483 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
11/2/2005 7:47:20 AM (3495 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Jason Sheppard/PA
11/2/2005 3:06:05 PM (3554 views)

e-mail solicitation - christine/MA
10/28/2005 2:40:31 PM (2663 views)
Re: e-mail solicitation - Robert Franco/OH
10/28/2005 2:58:15 PM (3581 views)
Re: e-mail solicitation - Jacqueline Quaresimo/PA
10/29/2005 3:20:56 PM (3498 views)
Re: e-mail solicitation - Jason Sheppard/PA
10/30/2005 3:13:40 AM (3515 views)

QUESTION FOR F. LEE... - Scott Perry/PA
10/27/2005 5:28:13 PM (2641 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR F. LEE... - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/27/2005 7:00:49 PM (3623 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR F. LEE... - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/28/2005 6:33:17 AM (3706 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR F. LEE... - Jay Duncan/MO
10/28/2005 8:32:35 AM (3680 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR F. LEE... - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/28/2005 9:34:25 AM (3684 views)

C2C - Smitty Strickland/SC
10/27/2005 5:02:32 PM (2743 views)
Re: C2C - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/27/2005 5:24:29 PM (3856 views)
Re: C2C - Smitty Strickland/SC
10/27/2005 6:57:18 PM (3861 views)
Re: C2C - Anne Gilbert/VT
10/30/2005 10:35:27 AM (4108 views)
Re: C2C - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/30/2005 11:02:38 AM (3824 views)
Re: C2C - Jan Forster/NC
10/30/2005 11:16:02 AM (3806 views)
Re: C2C - Barbara Bennett/IN
10/30/2005 7:04:52 PM (3984 views)

The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
10/27/2005 3:04:25 PM (3073 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
10/27/2005 5:01:27 PM (3833 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - george Hubka/MI
10/27/2005 8:19:11 PM (3885 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
10/27/2005 11:36:45 PM (3880 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - LAWANDA MCMILLIAN/AR
10/28/2005 9:04:13 AM (3895 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
10/28/2005 11:55:35 AM (3944 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jason Sheppard/PA
10/30/2005 3:36:45 AM (3863 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Scott Perry/PA
10/30/2005 8:28:20 AM (3821 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
10/30/2005 4:15:44 PM (5824 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jason Sheppard/PA
10/31/2005 11:18:07 AM (3961 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/31/2005 6:53:37 PM (3873 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
11/1/2005 10:00:35 AM (3866 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Tammy Knight/MO
11/1/2005 11:33:33 PM (3828 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - J Nisonger/CA
11/2/2005 4:42:30 AM (3808 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
11/2/2005 9:41:53 AM (5546 views)

Tammy,

There was a long hard discussion when NALTEA was being set up on who was going to be allowed to join, mainly based on years of experience.  In the end it was decided and accepted at the first conference that an abstractor, reguardless of experience could join, provided they fulfill the other membership requirements.  That is also why there are four different types of membership.  Please read the Code of Regulations http://www.naltea.org/code_of_regulations.pdf and you will see that to be a full member 70% of your income must come from abstract/title searching, etc...

NALTEA was not set up to oversee or run anyones business and not every member will agree on what NALTEA supports or does.  It would be pie-in-the-sky thinking if thought ever crossed anyone's mind.  Please read the mission statement of NALTEA in that same link.

NALTEA is an association that shows the industry that we, as abstractors, a) exist
 
b) care about what direction the industry is taking.

c) care about the training, or lack of training, that exist.

d) cares about how abstract work affects the consumer.

There is a Code of Ethics that you can view at http://www.naltea.org/ethics.pdf.  Those are the ethics that NALTEA goes by.  If someone believes those ethics have been violated then report it.  It is not an ethics violation just because one does not agree with a business approach.  NALTEA encourges people to step it up to the next notch.  NALTEA is not here to punish people.

Next there is another step in NALTEA to set one's self apart from other abstractors and that is the NALTEA Certification Program.  A lot of people have worked very hard on this and we are nearing the final review for this process.

Back to your questions:
The one thing that keeps our small biz from joining, is the fact that there doesn't seem to be any screening process for who you accept It's not so much what can NALTEA do for our company, but is my company going to rise a notch respectfully by being a member; because other companies know that not just anyone can get in.

Yes there is a screening process as outlined on the application and the Codie of Regulations.  Your statement reflects, yes you want something out it.  How can any company look down on you for joining an association that wants to improve abstractors and their part of the industry as a whole.

Are you going to not accept renewals from members that do exactly what NALTEA discourages and so on. If I join something, I want it to be deserved.

As long a member follows the Code of Regulations and Code of Ethics.  Again this goes back to abstractors are not going to agree on everything.

Has NALTEA ever turned anyone away or not let them renew their membership??  

As of this date NALTEA has not had to turn down any application that has been sent in.  Most abstractors that look to join NALTEA have good intentions.

If you are looking for an excuse not to join, there are a million of them.  There were a million of excuses not to put NALTEA together in the first place. 

But, there was a need to put NALTEA together and there is a need for abstractors to join NALTEA is they want to see any kind of positive change in the industry for abstractors and the consumer.

I hope I answered your questions.

Jay Duncan

to post a reply: login - or - register


Re: The Future of the Industry - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 3:15:16 AM (3864 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
11/3/2005 10:08:57 AM (5562 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
11/3/2005 10:51:28 AM (3874 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
11/3/2005 11:05:37 AM (3807 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Patrick Scott/IL
11/3/2005 12:09:46 PM (3775 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 12:58:57 PM (3735 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Patrick Scott/IL
11/3/2005 1:51:58 PM (3794 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
11/3/2005 2:16:46 PM (3749 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Langdon Knight/MO
11/3/2005 5:31:39 PM (3792 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Langdon Knight/MO
11/3/2005 5:31:40 PM (3744 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Langdon Knight/MO
11/3/2005 5:34:10 PM (3769 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
11/3/2005 5:09:11 PM (3775 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 5:42:30 PM (3717 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
11/3/2005 6:01:28 PM (3685 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 6:29:59 PM (3766 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Douglas Gallant/OH
11/3/2005 6:52:44 PM (3754 views)

Electronic storage - Deborah Manion/VA
10/27/2005 9:58:43 AM (2634 views)
Re: Electronic storage - Jay Duncan/MO
10/27/2005 10:16:46 AM (5412 views)
Re: Electronic storage - David Bloys/TX
10/27/2005 12:10:20 PM (5528 views)
Re: Electronic storage - Robert Franco/OH
10/27/2005 12:10:48 PM (5395 views)
Re: Electronic storage - Jay Duncan/MO
10/27/2005 12:17:05 PM (3748 views)
Re: Electronic storage - David Bloys/TX
10/27/2005 12:24:20 PM (3739 views)
Re: Electronic storage - Robert Franco/OH
10/27/2005 1:05:46 PM (5783 views)
Re: Electronic storage - Deborah Manion/VA
10/27/2005 3:58:05 PM (3702 views)

Starting your own business - Angela Glass/MD
10/25/2005 8:49:48 PM (2811 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Jay Duncan/MO
10/25/2005 9:10:51 PM (5353 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Loretta Reed/MD
10/26/2005 8:18:36 AM (4049 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Angela Glass/MD
10/26/2005 9:05:53 AM (3865 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/26/2005 11:24:06 AM (3925 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Kurt deVries/FL
10/26/2005 3:40:05 PM (3903 views)
Re: Starting your own business - george Hubka/MI
10/27/2005 8:31:07 PM (3889 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Kurt deVries/FL
10/28/2005 11:26:19 AM (3871 views)

Passing... - Jay Duncan/MO
10/24/2005 3:24:08 PM (2777 views)
Re: Passing... - Scott Perry/PA
10/24/2005 5:07:51 PM (3891 views)
Re: Passing... - Kurt deVries/FL
10/25/2005 11:04:13 AM (3799 views)

Abstractors Aid In New Orleans' Recovery - Jarrod Clabaugh/OH
10/24/2005 10:19:12 AM (3742 views)
Re: Abstractors Aid In New Orleans' Recovery - Heather St. Amant/LA
11/14/2005 7:59:00 PM (3842 views)
Re: Abstractors Aid In New Orleans' Recovery - James "Lin" Toney/MS
11/14/2005 9:16:55 PM (3894 views)

Hey Kurt! - J Nisonger/CA
10/24/2005 12:06:20 AM (2757 views)
Re: Hey Kurt! - Kurt deVries/FL
10/24/2005 9:37:58 AM (4160 views)
Re: Hey Kurt! - J Nisonger/CA
10/25/2005 10:43:14 PM (4062 views)
Re: Hey Kurt! - Kurt deVries/FL
10/26/2005 9:31:29 AM (4039 views)


<< get older messagesget newer messages >>

DISCLAIMER: These Message Forums are un-moderated and Source of Title does not endorse the content of any of the posts. Source of Title discourages libelous comments and you, as the sole creator of the content, take full responsibility for your remarks.
Directory

The Source of Title Business directory has 8923 listed companies.

Leave feedback on a company:
SOT ID #:  learn more...
DRN Title Search
Blogs

Read other users' blogs-- or start your own!

Most Recent Blog Posts:

Unveiling the Costs: Why Commercial Title Searches Command a Premium
Security American's Blog
2024/04/17
0 comments

Protecting Your Home: The Ins and Outs of Deed Theft and How to Shield Yourself
Security American's Blog
2024/03/21
0 comments

Exploring the Implications of Eliminating Mandatory Title Insurance
Security American's Blog
2024/03/11
0 comments

Articles

Source of Title articles help to keep you informed on the state of the title industry.

May Jobs Report Commentary from MBA's Mike Fratantoni
“Despite these signs of strength from the establishment survey, the household survey indicated a weaker job market...
Medici Land Governance Working With Fidelity Title Insurance Company to Create Immutable Databases for Baltimore Housing Properties
Title reports currently require information covering 60 years. Searching just one takes a minimum of two hours, and ofte...
Mortgage Applications Decrease in Latest MBA Weekly Survey
“Mortgage rates moved slightly higher last week, with the 30-year conforming rate reaching 7.07 percent – it...
ALTA Honored in Four Categories of 45th Annual Telly Awards
“ALTA is proud to be honored with these four Telly Awards,” said ALTA CEO Diane Tomb.“The ALTA Good De...
Single-Family and Multifamily Production Headed in Opposite Directions Across Geographies
“While single-family construction expanded in the first quarter despite higher mortgage rates, multifamily constru...

Search Articles:
browse...

Classifieds

Buy, sell, or trade! Browse the ads or post your own!

LOCAL SEARCHERS (PA& EVERYWHERE)-WE PAY
June 04 2024
We are an AMERICAN production and marketplace company, working with most of the major underwriters and Seeking LOCAL independant title searcher(s) for regular work in the following PA counties:
Huntingdon
Mifflin
Juniata
Greene
Warren
Cameron...[more info]


link
email
© 2020, Source of Title.