Real Title Services
Register
Log In
Forget your Password?

Home
Directory
Bulletins
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Links
Classifieds
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
FAQ
Privacy Policy


Discussion
<< get older messagesget newer messages >>
to post a message: login - or - register | search messages | hide all replies



First Merit Settlement Services, Inc...... - Matt Papsch/MD
10/31/2005 4:02:57 PM (3671 views)
Re: First Merit Settlement Services, Inc...... - Annette Dorty/PA
10/31/2005 6:36:32 PM (5615 views)
Re: First Merit Settlement Services, Inc...... - Kurt deVries/FL
11/1/2005 11:03:33 AM (5612 views)
Re: First Merit Settlement Services, Inc...... - Laurie E/MD
11/1/2005 4:25:18 PM (5487 views)
Re: First Merit Settlement Services, Inc...... - Matt Papsch/MD
11/1/2005 10:52:12 PM (5433 views)

You mean I have to pay for it?? - Robert Franco/OH
10/31/2005 1:25:11 PM (3289 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Matthew DeLand/NY
10/31/2005 1:39:14 PM (5691 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - David Nixon/MA
10/31/2005 4:56:47 PM (5486 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Rachel Malone/PA
11/1/2005 7:18:01 AM (5388 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Kevin Ahern/CT
11/1/2005 8:25:04 AM (5548 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Kurt deVries/FL
11/1/2005 11:00:56 AM (5355 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Kelli Gorman/TX
11/1/2005 12:59:42 PM (5445 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - David Nixon/MA
11/1/2005 2:27:05 PM (5494 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - george Hubka/MI
11/3/2005 5:37:02 AM (5352 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Kelli Gorman/TX
11/6/2005 1:39:05 AM (5401 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - george Hubka/MI
11/3/2005 5:24:23 AM (5280 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 1:40:35 PM (5426 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Phyllis Agan/GA
11/5/2005 1:00:14 PM (5344 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Scott Perry/PA
11/5/2005 3:11:22 PM (5293 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - David Bloys/TX
11/5/2005 6:24:53 PM (5354 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Scott Perry/PA
11/5/2005 10:12:02 PM (5390 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - David Bloys/TX
11/6/2005 8:39:14 AM (5370 views)

Red Vision article on SOT - Donna Grady/NC
10/30/2005 1:05:13 AM (3693 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/30/2005 6:03:27 AM (5688 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 9:55:34 AM (5621 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/30/2005 11:01:49 AM (5640 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/30/2005 11:10:18 AM (5598 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Jan Forster/NC
10/30/2005 11:20:44 AM (5608 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 11:57:34 AM (5692 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 11:47:41 AM (5405 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 11:40:40 AM (7452 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/30/2005 12:26:09 PM (5702 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 12:56:30 PM (5767 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Donna Grady/NC
10/30/2005 10:07:33 PM (5506 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 10:42:07 PM (5587 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Matthew DeLand/NY
10/31/2005 1:25:57 PM (5583 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Robert Franco/OH
10/31/2005 1:59:55 PM (5654 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Matthew DeLand/NY
10/31/2005 2:44:27 PM (5751 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Jan Forster/NC
10/31/2005 3:01:15 PM (5457 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/31/2005 11:07:46 PM (5366 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Kevin Ahern/CT
11/2/2005 7:52:40 AM (5387 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Michaela Urban/OH
11/3/2005 1:48:08 PM (5362 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Kevin Ahern/CT
11/3/2005 3:49:00 PM (5323 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Michaela Urban/OH
11/3/2005 10:06:55 PM (5404 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 11:57:20 PM (5439 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Barbara Bennett/IN
11/4/2005 3:07:08 PM (5390 views)

TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/29/2005 12:25:52 PM (3590 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/29/2005 1:58:01 PM (5779 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/29/2005 3:46:53 PM (5491 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - monica froese/ME
10/29/2005 9:07:18 PM (5680 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/29/2005 10:02:46 PM (5502 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Jason Sheppard/PA
10/30/2005 2:46:39 AM (7875 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - J.T. Shoemaker/NY
10/30/2005 7:36:04 PM (5610 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - george Hubka/MI
10/31/2005 7:42:19 AM (5663 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Jason Sheppard/PA
10/31/2005 11:17:12 AM (5955 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/31/2005 6:39:59 PM (5496 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/31/2005 9:32:44 PM (5652 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/31/2005 9:20:01 PM (5575 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/31/2005 9:44:44 PM (5562 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/31/2005 9:25:59 PM (5435 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - J.T. Shoemaker/NY
11/1/2005 6:02:23 PM (5410 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
11/1/2005 7:47:31 PM (5374 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Tammy Knight/MO
11/1/2005 11:05:20 PM (5464 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Tammy Knight/MO
11/1/2005 11:10:38 PM (5431 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
11/2/2005 7:47:20 AM (5536 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Jason Sheppard/PA
11/2/2005 3:06:05 PM (5498 views)

e-mail solicitation - christine/MA
10/28/2005 2:40:31 PM (3379 views)
Re: e-mail solicitation - Robert Franco/OH
10/28/2005 2:58:15 PM (5968 views)
Re: e-mail solicitation - Jacqueline Quaresimo/PA
10/29/2005 3:20:56 PM (5432 views)
Re: e-mail solicitation - Jason Sheppard/PA
10/30/2005 3:13:40 AM (5459 views)




QUESTION FOR F. LEE... - Scott Perry/PA
10/27/2005 5:28:13 PM (3368 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR F. LEE... - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/27/2005 7:00:49 PM (5904 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR F. LEE... - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/28/2005 6:33:17 AM (6093 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR F. LEE... - Jay Duncan/MO
10/28/2005 8:32:35 AM (6119 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR F. LEE... - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/28/2005 9:34:25 AM (6012 views)

C2C - Smitty Strickland/SC
10/27/2005 5:02:32 PM (3378 views)
Re: C2C - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/27/2005 5:24:29 PM (6289 views)
Re: C2C - Smitty Strickland/SC
10/27/2005 6:57:18 PM (6184 views)
Re: C2C - Anne Gilbert/VT
10/30/2005 10:35:27 AM (6145 views)
Re: C2C - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/30/2005 11:02:38 AM (5847 views)
Re: C2C - Jan Forster/NC
10/30/2005 11:16:02 AM (5776 views)
Re: C2C - Barbara Bennett/IN
10/30/2005 7:04:52 PM (5957 views)

The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
10/27/2005 3:04:25 PM (4042 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
10/27/2005 5:01:27 PM (5915 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - george Hubka/MI
10/27/2005 8:19:11 PM (6245 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
10/27/2005 11:36:45 PM (6161 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - LAWANDA MCMILLIAN/AR
10/28/2005 9:04:13 AM (6263 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
10/28/2005 11:55:35 AM (6324 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jason Sheppard/PA
10/30/2005 3:36:45 AM (5867 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Scott Perry/PA
10/30/2005 8:28:20 AM (5676 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
10/30/2005 4:15:44 PM (8071 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jason Sheppard/PA
10/31/2005 11:18:07 AM (5816 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/31/2005 6:53:37 PM (5809 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
11/1/2005 10:00:35 AM (5790 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Tammy Knight/MO
11/1/2005 11:33:33 PM (5800 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - J Nisonger/CA
11/2/2005 4:42:30 AM (5728 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
11/2/2005 9:41:53 AM (7602 views)

Tammy,

There was a long hard discussion when NALTEA was being set up on who was going to be allowed to join, mainly based on years of experience.  In the end it was decided and accepted at the first conference that an abstractor, reguardless of experience could join, provided they fulfill the other membership requirements.  That is also why there are four different types of membership.  Please read the Code of Regulations http://www.naltea.org/code_of_regulations.pdf and you will see that to be a full member 70% of your income must come from abstract/title searching, etc...

NALTEA was not set up to oversee or run anyones business and not every member will agree on what NALTEA supports or does.  It would be pie-in-the-sky thinking if thought ever crossed anyone's mind.  Please read the mission statement of NALTEA in that same link.

NALTEA is an association that shows the industry that we, as abstractors, a) exist
 
b) care about what direction the industry is taking.

c) care about the training, or lack of training, that exist.

d) cares about how abstract work affects the consumer.

There is a Code of Ethics that you can view at http://www.naltea.org/ethics.pdf.  Those are the ethics that NALTEA goes by.  If someone believes those ethics have been violated then report it.  It is not an ethics violation just because one does not agree with a business approach.  NALTEA encourges people to step it up to the next notch.  NALTEA is not here to punish people.

Next there is another step in NALTEA to set one's self apart from other abstractors and that is the NALTEA Certification Program.  A lot of people have worked very hard on this and we are nearing the final review for this process.

Back to your questions:
The one thing that keeps our small biz from joining, is the fact that there doesn't seem to be any screening process for who you accept It's not so much what can NALTEA do for our company, but is my company going to rise a notch respectfully by being a member; because other companies know that not just anyone can get in.

Yes there is a screening process as outlined on the application and the Codie of Regulations.  Your statement reflects, yes you want something out it.  How can any company look down on you for joining an association that wants to improve abstractors and their part of the industry as a whole.

Are you going to not accept renewals from members that do exactly what NALTEA discourages and so on. If I join something, I want it to be deserved.

As long a member follows the Code of Regulations and Code of Ethics.  Again this goes back to abstractors are not going to agree on everything.

Has NALTEA ever turned anyone away or not let them renew their membership??  

As of this date NALTEA has not had to turn down any application that has been sent in.  Most abstractors that look to join NALTEA have good intentions.

If you are looking for an excuse not to join, there are a million of them.  There were a million of excuses not to put NALTEA together in the first place. 

But, there was a need to put NALTEA together and there is a need for abstractors to join NALTEA is they want to see any kind of positive change in the industry for abstractors and the consumer.

I hope I answered your questions.

Jay Duncan

to post a reply: login - or - register


Re: The Future of the Industry - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 3:15:16 AM (5825 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
11/3/2005 10:08:57 AM (7653 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
11/3/2005 10:51:28 AM (5892 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
11/3/2005 11:05:37 AM (5721 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Patrick Scott/IL
11/3/2005 12:09:46 PM (5721 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 12:58:57 PM (5686 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Patrick Scott/IL
11/3/2005 1:51:58 PM (5758 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
11/3/2005 2:16:46 PM (5642 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Langdon Knight/MO
11/3/2005 5:31:39 PM (5747 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Langdon Knight/MO
11/3/2005 5:31:40 PM (5702 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Langdon Knight/MO
11/3/2005 5:34:10 PM (5760 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
11/3/2005 5:09:11 PM (5730 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 5:42:30 PM (5626 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
11/3/2005 6:01:28 PM (5562 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 6:29:59 PM (5672 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Douglas Gallant/OH
11/3/2005 6:52:44 PM (5727 views)

Electronic storage - Deborah Manion/VA
10/27/2005 9:58:43 AM (3297 views)
Re: Electronic storage - Jay Duncan/MO
10/27/2005 10:16:46 AM (8356 views)
Re: Electronic storage - David Bloys/TX
10/27/2005 12:10:20 PM (8495 views)
Re: Electronic storage - Robert Franco/OH
10/27/2005 12:10:48 PM (8254 views)
Re: Electronic storage - Jay Duncan/MO
10/27/2005 12:17:05 PM (6220 views)
Re: Electronic storage - David Bloys/TX
10/27/2005 12:24:20 PM (6109 views)
Re: Electronic storage - Robert Franco/OH
10/27/2005 1:05:46 PM (8571 views)
Re: Electronic storage - Deborah Manion/VA
10/27/2005 3:58:05 PM (5919 views)

Starting your own business - Angela Glass/MD
10/25/2005 8:49:48 PM (3432 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Jay Duncan/MO
10/25/2005 9:10:51 PM (8249 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Loretta Reed/MD
10/26/2005 8:18:36 AM (6401 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Angela Glass/MD
10/26/2005 9:05:53 AM (6216 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/26/2005 11:24:06 AM (6356 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Kurt deVries/FL
10/26/2005 3:40:05 PM (6277 views)
Re: Starting your own business - george Hubka/MI
10/27/2005 8:31:07 PM (6276 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Kurt deVries/FL
10/28/2005 11:26:19 AM (6149 views)

Passing... - Jay Duncan/MO
10/24/2005 3:24:08 PM (3457 views)
Re: Passing... - Scott Perry/PA
10/24/2005 5:07:51 PM (6156 views)
Re: Passing... - Kurt deVries/FL
10/25/2005 11:04:13 AM (6184 views)

Abstractors Aid In New Orleans' Recovery - Jarrod Clabaugh/OH
10/24/2005 10:19:12 AM (4497 views)
Re: Abstractors Aid In New Orleans' Recovery - Heather St. Amant/LA
11/14/2005 7:59:00 PM (5678 views)
Re: Abstractors Aid In New Orleans' Recovery - James "Lin" Toney/MS
11/14/2005 9:16:55 PM (5829 views)

Hey Kurt! - J Nisonger/CA
10/24/2005 12:06:20 AM (3450 views)
Re: Hey Kurt! - Kurt deVries/FL
10/24/2005 9:37:58 AM (6528 views)
Re: Hey Kurt! - J Nisonger/CA
10/25/2005 10:43:14 PM (6435 views)
Re: Hey Kurt! - Kurt deVries/FL
10/26/2005 9:31:29 AM (6513 views)

Whine, whine, whine... - Jay Duncan/MO
10/23/2005 10:43:57 PM (4630 views)
Re: Whine, whine, whine... - Jay Duncan/MO
10/23/2005 10:48:42 PM (6337 views)
Re: Whine, whine, whine... - Langdon Knight/MO
10/24/2005 1:26:33 AM (6234 views)
Re: Whine, whine, whine... - Deborah Manion/VA
10/24/2005 9:20:18 AM (6647 views)
Re: Whine, whine, whine... - Patrick Scott/IL
10/24/2005 11:23:40 AM (6618 views)
Re: Whine, whine, whine... - Scott Perry/PA
10/24/2005 9:33:41 PM (6607 views)
Re: Whine, whine, whine... - Patrick Scott/IL
10/24/2005 10:45:40 PM (6576 views)

Here we go again!! - Kurt deVries/FL
10/21/2005 3:38:08 PM (3563 views)
Re: Here we go again!! - Scott Perry/PA
10/21/2005 4:15:36 PM (6439 views)
Re: Here we go again!! - Kurt deVries/FL
10/21/2005 4:23:57 PM (6538 views)
Re: Here we go again!! - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/21/2005 4:54:04 PM (6776 views)
Re: Here we go again!! - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/23/2005 3:54:46 PM (6766 views)


<< get older messagesget newer messages >>

DISCLAIMER: These Message Forums are un-moderated and Source of Title does not endorse the content of any of the posts. Source of Title discourages libelous comments and you, as the sole creator of the content, take full responsibility for your remarks.
Directory

The Source of Title Business directory has 8975 listed companies.

Leave feedback on a company:
SOT ID #:  learn more...
DRN Title Search
Blogs

Read other users' blogs-- or start your own!

Most Recent Blog Posts:

Practical Obscurity, Revisited
Blurbs from the Bossman
2026/08/06
0 comments

Beneath Every Closing Lies a Story
Michael Stelzer's Blog
2026/07/18
0 comments

Residential Appraisers: Reclaim Your Time
Will Duncan 's Blog
2026/07/09
0 comments

Articles

Source of Title articles help to keep you informed on the state of the title industry.

Multifamily Developer Confidence Weakens in Second Quarter
“It is clear that supply-side headwinds continue to weigh on multifamily developer sentiment,” said NAHB Chi...
Mortgage Applications Decrease in Latest MBA Weekly Survey
“In the wake of the July FOMC meeting, longer-term rates increased, with mortgage rates reaching their highest lev...
Home Prices Increased in 80% of Metro Areas in Second Quarter of 2026
“Home sales increased despite mortgage rates rising. This testifies to the potential housing demand building up fr...
Hopdox Opens eRecording in Glades County, Florida, Advancing Mission to Bring eRecording to Every County Nationwide
“One of the reasons I founded Hopdox was because I believe every county should have access to the benefits of eRec...
Radian Advances Strategic Transformation to Global Multi-Line Specialty Insurer with Sale of Real Estate Services Business and Agreement to Sell Title Business
Radian Group Inc. today announced that it has completed the sale of its Real Estate Services business to PLACE, a real e...

Search Articles:
browse...

Classifieds

Buy, sell, or trade! Browse the ads or post your own!

© 2020, Source of Title.