Register
Log In
Forget your Password?

Home
Directory
Bulletins
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Links
Classifieds
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
FAQ
Privacy Policy


Discussion
<< get older messagesget newer messages >>
to post a message: login - or - register | search messages | hide all replies



Searcher Liability Question - Larry Crooks/OH
6/29/2005 4:02:29 PM (2674 views)
Re: Searcher Liability Question - Kevin Ahern/CT
6/29/2005 5:03:27 PM (3598 views)
Re: Searcher Liability Question - Robert Franco/OH
6/29/2005 7:17:46 PM (3827 views)
Re: Searcher Liability Question - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/29/2005 11:39:52 PM (3886 views)
Re: Searcher Liability Question - Larry Crooks/OH
6/30/2005 6:49:16 AM (3705 views)
Re: Searcher Liability Question - Kevin Ahern/CT
6/30/2005 8:41:48 AM (3946 views)
Re: Searcher Liability Question - Robert Franco/OH
6/30/2005 10:05:58 AM (3840 views)
Re: Searcher Liability Question - Larry Crooks/OH
6/30/2005 12:37:48 PM (3718 views)
Re: Searcher Liability Question - Regina Engebritson Engebritson/MN
8/10/2005 8:33:33 PM (3560 views)

reporting tax status on searches - christine/MA
6/29/2005 9:02:48 AM (2680 views)
Re: reporting tax status on searches - ANDREW MOLLER/CT
6/29/2005 10:45:43 AM (3763 views)
Re: reporting tax status on searches - Steve Schneider/IN
6/29/2005 12:48:32 PM (3722 views)
Re: reporting tax status on searches - Danielle Nelson/WI
6/29/2005 12:58:02 PM (3670 views)
Re: reporting tax status on searches - Scott Perry/PA
6/29/2005 5:45:48 PM (3700 views)
Re: reporting tax status on searches - Kim Haase/MT
6/30/2005 1:26:31 AM (4003 views)

In Response to Robert's Thread of 6/24 - J.T. Shoemaker/NY
6/27/2005 9:16:08 AM (3305 views)

Mr Davis and his claims - James "Lin" Toney/MS
6/26/2005 11:23:26 PM (2739 views)
Re: Mr Davis and his claims - J.T. Shoemaker/NY
6/27/2005 9:20:06 AM (3832 views)
Re: Mr Davis and his claims - Deborah Manion/VA
6/27/2005 9:39:35 AM (3754 views)
Re: Mr Davis and his claims - James "Lin" Toney/MS
6/27/2005 5:18:18 PM (3645 views)
Re: Mr Davis and his claims - J.T. Shoemaker/NY
6/27/2005 8:37:06 PM (3760 views)
Re: Mr Davis and his claims - David Chisolm/MS
6/30/2005 5:12:56 PM (3775 views)
Re: Mr Davis and his claims - James "Lin" Toney/MS
6/30/2005 6:21:49 PM (3775 views)
Re: Mr Davis and his claims - James "Lin" Toney/MS
7/2/2005 12:17:02 AM (3803 views)

QUESTION FOR TECHIES - Scott Perry/PA
6/26/2005 10:21:53 PM (2596 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR TECHIES - Robert Franco/OH
6/27/2005 12:54:39 AM (3722 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR TECHIES - Christy Rathbun/CT
6/27/2005 2:00:24 AM (3781 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR TECHIES - Scott Perry/PA
6/30/2005 7:14:47 PM (4144 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR TECHIES - Cherie Smurthwaite/CA
6/30/2005 10:01:20 PM (4005 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR TECHIES - J Nisonger/CA
7/1/2005 1:11:29 PM (4101 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR TECHIES - Robert Franco/OH
7/1/2005 3:33:03 PM (3909 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR TECHIES - Scott Perry/PA
7/2/2005 12:21:20 PM (3984 views)




Non-payment for services rendered - Serena Stout/VA
6/24/2005 12:08:53 PM (2984 views)
Re: Non-payment for services rendered - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/24/2005 1:39:21 PM (7577 views)
Re: Non-payment for services rendered - Kevin Ahern/CT
6/24/2005 2:55:09 PM (4104 views)

If they have not complained to you about your work, have not paid you and have not responded to your demands for payment, they are most likely experiencing financial difficulties. The first thing you need to do is find out if they are still in business. If they have gone belly up or are insolvent any court judgment you obtain against them will be difficult to collect. The court does not act as a collection agency. It determines whether a debt is justly owed. If the defendant has no assets, you can not get blood out of a stone. If you do obtain a worthwhile judgment against them you need to follow your state's procedue to enforce the judgment. Usually that means having an execution (court order) issued by the court for a small fee which empowers a sheriff/marshal or other law enforcement official to levy on a bank account, wages, accounts receivable or to seize and sell non-exempt personal property to pay your judgment.

If you determine that the defendant is solvent, and worth suing, you next need to determine whether you were dealing with a corporation, limited liability company, general partnership, limited partnership or individual. Each has slightly different requirements for service of process depending on the state in which you or they reside. If you are within the jurisdiction of small claims court, the requirements of service of process are relatively simple.It is set up for people to proceed on their own without attorneys in the most simple way possible. Usually in small claims cases it is only a matter of paying a small filing fee, filing the complaint, and showing up to testify on the day of trial.  

If on the other hand the amount of your claim puts you up into the next tier of court (Superior Court in Connecticut), you will almost certainly need a lawyer because you will be held accountable to the same rules of evidence and civil procedure as a lawyer. If your own company is a corporation, limited liability company or other entity recognized by your state as having a legal identity separate from you personally, you will almost certainly need a lawyer because in most states a non-lawyer cannot represent these entities without engaging in an unauthorized practice of law. In Connecticut an exception is made for small claims court. 

In any event you will need to know the exact name of your client in order to write it on the court pleadings. This is important because if you win your case, and want the court to issue an execution, you will want the execution to match the client's name on the bank account, wages or accounts receivable that you are garnishing. This is also true as to the name on the defendant's personal property to be sold or the deed for real estate that is to be taken or sold at public auction after foreclosure to pay your judgment. Very often you can get this information by checking the webpage for the Secretary of State in which the defendant is located. There are also other sources for this information.

Now that you have determined that the defendant is solvent and worth suing ,and have determined the exact name of the defendant, you have to decide where to sue the defendant. If the defendant is located in the same state as your business, you can sue him in your state without too much of a problem. If the defendant is located in a different state, has not appointed the Secretary of State for your State or some other entity in your state to receive service of process or has not  engaged in other conduct which would render him subject to the jurisdiction of your state's court,  you will probably need to sue the defendant in his native state. There was a very long discussion on this issue last month on this board. If you do a search it may answer a number of your questions.

If the defendant is located in a foreign state, choosing a court in which to sue him may be a dilema. If you sue the defendant in your state, he is almost certain to test the jurisdiction of the court with a motion to dismiss. That is the first question that any good defense attorney will ask when he represents a client located outside the forum state. However, the defendant may not be represented by counsel, and may not know enough to file this motion or he may otherwise submit to the jurisdiction of your state's court. You may or may not win. If you lose on this issue you will need to refile the case in the court of the Defendant's native state. You will then need to pay the court's filing fee and any associated expenses for service of process a second time.  In my opinion a plaintiff is always better off suing a foreign defendant in his native state because it eliminates the defendant's ability to challenge the court's jurisdiction on the basis of his location.

If you win the suit the courts of most states will allow you to recover your filing fees and sheriff's/marshal's fee for service of process in addition to your damages.

You will also almost certainly be able to collect legal interest on the amount of the judgment if the defendant fails to pay your judgment immediately. In some states the interest will accrue from the date of judgment. In other states it will accrue from an earlier date. You can actually make money on the deal, and recover some of the costs of litigation through the legal interest. I won a case several years ago in which the defendant delayed in paying the judgment. By that time another $1,300.00 in legal interest had accrued. I found a really vicious female marshal to serve the property execution. She threw on  another 10% of the judgment on top of it for her fee. We received payment in full within a matter of days after she served the execution.

However, waiting to collect your judgment can be a gamble if the defendant is experiencing money problems. In this case you would want to execute on the judgment immediately. Whether you wait or proceed immediately to execute the judgment, you will want to secure the judgment by immediately filing/recording a judgment lien with the appropriate authority. In Connecticut that would be the Secretary of State for personal property and the Town Clerk in which the defendant's real estate is located. Filing/recording the judgment lien will protect you as a secured creditor in the event that the defendant bankrupts. It will also make it difficult for him to sell real estate or personal property with the lien attached to it or the buyer may become subject to the payment of your judgment. It will also impact on his credit rating if he is applying for a loan or other extension of credit.

Whether you can also recover attorney's fees depends on the law of the state in which the court is located. In Connecticut for instance you would need to have a written contract or statute that provided for recovery of attorney's fees, but the laws of the state in which you sue the defendant may differ. There are also alternate theories of recovery other than contract breach which may provide for the recovery of attorney's fees.

If you have to sue the defendant in another state and need an attorney it is a simple matter of making a telephone call to a law firm in the defendant's location. Law firms are very used to getting calls like this from out of state client's, and legal representation can be easily arranged. You will need to travel to the other state to testify at trial, and there will be travel expenses involved. You will need to consider whether this expense is justified by the amount you are trying to collect when making a decision as to whether or not to sue the defendant. However, in debt collection cases the defendant very often folds up, defaults and loses immediately by not appearing in the case or not pleading a response to your complaint. In this situation it becomes very easy to obtain your judgment at minimal expense.

So, to summarize:

1.     Determine if the defendant is still in business or insolvent.

2.     Make certain that you have the exact name of the defendant
        drafted on your court pleadings and executions. Do not use part 
        of the corporate name or limited liability company. Very often
        people forget to include the "Inc." or the "LLC" after the 
        defendant's name. Do not sue the defendant under a trade 
        name or fictitious name alone.

3.     Decide in which state to sue the defendant, and then observe the
        procedures of that court.

4.    If you win, have the court issue the appropriate order (An execution 
       in Connecticut) to enforce the judgment, and refer it to the appropriate 
       authority for collection.

This probably seems like a lot of information to digest, but that's the legal biz.

to post a reply: login - or - register


Serena, is that you - Shannon Blatt/VA
6/24/2005 3:57:51 PM (3849 views)

The worst invention ever! - Robert Franco/OH
6/24/2005 9:32:21 AM (2841 views)
Re: The worst invention ever! - Jay Duncan/MO
6/24/2005 9:44:30 AM (3857 views)
Re: The worst invention ever! - David Nixon/MA
6/24/2005 12:08:29 PM (3817 views)
Re: The worst invention ever! - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/24/2005 9:49:59 AM (3822 views)
Re: The worst invention ever! - Shannon Blatt/VA
6/24/2005 3:55:26 PM (3720 views)
Re: The worst invention ever! - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/24/2005 4:48:38 PM (3737 views)
Re: The worst invention ever! - Kelly Chamblee/OH
6/27/2005 5:37:53 PM (3551 views)
Re: The worst invention ever! - Norean/GA
7/1/2005 6:19:22 PM (3671 views)
Re: The worst invention ever! - Lisa Ramsey/TX
7/2/2005 1:04:32 PM (4029 views)
Re: The worst invention ever! - Jeanne Mendes/CA
8/30/2005 5:41:59 AM (3566 views)

Sorry.... - Jason Sheppard/PA
6/23/2005 5:33:58 PM (2113 views)

TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/23/2005 10:36:17 AM (3857 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Kim Haase/MT
6/23/2005 11:50:43 AM (3822 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/23/2005 12:15:19 PM (3919 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - David Bloys/TX
6/23/2005 12:58:16 PM (3846 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - David Bloys/TX
6/23/2005 1:50:32 PM (6700 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/23/2005 1:55:43 PM (6452 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/23/2005 2:02:08 PM (3868 views)
THANK YOU TO LISA & DAVID - Kim Haase/MT
6/24/2005 3:27:52 AM (3785 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Jonathan Figliuolo/NY
6/27/2005 3:14:02 PM (3574 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/27/2005 6:46:02 PM (3630 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Scott Perry/PA
6/28/2005 8:01:17 AM (3590 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/28/2005 11:29:35 AM (3470 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - David Bloys/TX
6/28/2005 3:04:43 PM (6395 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Robert Franco/OH
6/28/2005 3:22:23 PM (3525 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Scott Perry/PA
6/28/2005 11:40:25 PM (3548 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/29/2005 11:23:17 AM (3629 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Scott Perry/PA
6/29/2005 11:17:46 PM (3849 views)

Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Patrick Scott/IL
6/22/2005 6:10:51 PM (2749 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - David Bloys/TX
6/23/2005 11:39:44 AM (3770 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Robert Franco/OH
6/23/2005 1:55:44 PM (3902 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Ellen Malloy/MO
6/23/2005 9:21:20 PM (3797 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Patrick Scott/IL
6/24/2005 12:06:26 PM (3812 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Robert Franco/OH
6/24/2005 12:56:46 PM (3570 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Patrick Scott/IL
6/24/2005 3:12:14 PM (3710 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Shannon Blatt/VA
6/24/2005 4:05:54 PM (3592 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Robert Franco/OH
6/25/2005 2:14:51 PM (3705 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Patrick Scott/IL
6/27/2005 2:48:58 PM (3617 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Robert Franco/OH
6/27/2005 3:35:47 PM (3558 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Jay Duncan/MO
6/27/2005 5:37:43 PM (3595 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Douglas Gallant/OH
6/26/2005 6:07:23 PM (3595 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Mark Russomanno/NJ
6/25/2005 11:59:33 PM (3548 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Kevin Ahern/CT
6/26/2005 7:49:42 AM (3453 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - David Bloys/TX
6/26/2005 9:29:36 AM (3617 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Kevin Ahern/CT
6/26/2005 1:02:56 PM (3658 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - David Bloys/TX
6/26/2005 4:01:20 PM (3563 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Kevin Ahern/CT
6/26/2005 4:38:20 PM (3516 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Patrick Scott/IL
6/27/2005 3:03:57 PM (3522 views)

2005 Independent Abstractor Report - Jarrod Clabaugh/OH
6/21/2005 4:49:24 PM (2804 views)
Re: 2005 Independent Abstractor Report - Deborah Manion/VA
6/22/2005 3:04:55 PM (3570 views)
Re: 2005 Independent Abstractor Report - Jarrod Clabaugh/OH
6/22/2005 3:32:41 PM (3745 views)

VENDOR MANAGERS SPEAK UP - Michael Frank/TX
6/20/2005 7:21:18 PM (2853 views)
Re: VENDOR MANAGERS SPEAK UP - Michael Frank/TX
6/21/2005 1:55:00 PM (3750 views)
Re: VENDOR MANAGERS SPEAK UP - Robert Franco/OH
6/21/2005 2:17:29 PM (3848 views)
Re: VENDOR MANAGERS SPEAK UP - Kevin Ahern/CT
6/21/2005 2:27:22 PM (3803 views)
Re: VENDOR MANAGERS SPEAK UP - Jason Sheppard/PA
6/22/2005 5:55:03 PM (3733 views)
Re: VENDOR MANAGERS SPEAK UP - Kim Haase/MT
6/23/2005 11:52:47 AM (3731 views)
Re: VENDOR MANAGERS SPEAK UP - JOSEPH MARTINEZ/NM
7/6/2005 6:14:49 PM (3475 views)
Re: VENDOR MANAGERS SPEAK UP - J Nisonger/CA
7/8/2005 3:58:36 AM (3611 views)

Thanks for the E & O info - Kurt deVries/FL
6/20/2005 3:22:07 PM (2672 views)
Re: Thanks for the E & O info - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/20/2005 11:16:19 PM (3427 views)
Re: Thanks for the E & O info - Donna Grady/NC
7/7/2005 12:39:30 AM (3475 views)
Re: Thanks for the E & O info - Douglas Gallant/OH
7/7/2005 4:47:26 PM (3427 views)

Closing Company out of business? - Jen McClosky/OH
6/20/2005 1:57:34 PM (2589 views)
Re: Closing Company out of business? - Kevin Ahern/CT
6/20/2005 2:42:53 PM (3542 views)

QUESTION FOR VM'S: HOW MANY OF YOU... - Scott Perry/PA
6/18/2005 8:33:42 PM (2804 views)
GUESS THAT ANSWERS MY QUESTION! - Scott Perry/PA
6/20/2005 4:24:12 PM (3826 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR VM'S: HOW MANY OF YOU... - Suzannah White/TX
6/20/2005 6:01:55 PM (3710 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR VM'S: HOW MANY OF YOU... - Scott Perry/PA
6/20/2005 8:28:59 PM (3700 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR VM'S: HOW MANY OF YOU... - Jason Sheppard/PA
6/21/2005 11:09:04 AM (3734 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR VM'S: HOW MANY OF YOU... - Scott Perry/PA
6/21/2005 4:34:14 PM (3504 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR VM'S: HOW MANY OF YOU... - Douglas Gallant/OH
6/21/2005 8:00:25 PM (3909 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR VM'S: HOW MANY OF YOU... - Kevin Ahern/CT
6/21/2005 8:09:19 PM (3538 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR VM'S: HOW MANY OF YOU... - Scott Perry/PA
6/21/2005 9:59:02 PM (3709 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR VM'S: HOW MANY OF YOU... - Matthew DeLand/NY
6/28/2005 11:57:17 AM (3556 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR VM'S: HOW MANY OF YOU... - Jason Sheppard/PA
6/22/2005 3:46:55 PM (3637 views)


<< get older messagesget newer messages >>

DISCLAIMER: These Message Forums are un-moderated and Source of Title does not endorse the content of any of the posts. Source of Title discourages libelous comments and you, as the sole creator of the content, take full responsibility for your remarks.
Directory

The Source of Title Business directory has 8975 listed companies.

Leave feedback on a company:
SOT ID #:  learn more...
DRN Title Search
Blogs

Read other users' blogs-- or start your own!

Most Recent Blog Posts:

Practical Obscurity, Revisited
Blurbs from the Bossman
2026/08/06
0 comments

Beneath Every Closing Lies a Story
Michael Stelzer's Blog
2026/07/18
0 comments

Residential Appraisers: Reclaim Your Time
Will Duncan 's Blog
2026/07/09
0 comments

Articles

Source of Title articles help to keep you informed on the state of the title industry.

MISMO to Launch FRAME Interactive Workshop, Put AI Governance into Practice
"Everyone is trying to figure out how to use AI effectively, but just as importantly, how to do it responsibly," said MI...
Mortgage Applications Decrease in Latest MBA Weekly Survey
“Following last week’s spike in oil prices, mortgage rates moved higher, with the 30-year fixed rate increas...
Foreign Buyers Purchased $45.3 Billion Worth of U.S. Homes from April '25 to March '26
“The decline in foreign home buyer activity mirrors the decline in international visitors and tourists to the Unit...
Second Century Ventures Announces 8 Companies for 2026 REACH Commercial Scale-Up Program
Second Century Ventures, the strategic investment arm of the National Association of REALTORS® and the most active ...
New Home Sales Edge Higher as Affordability Challenges Persist
“New home sales are gaining some momentum at the more affordable range of the market, with homes priced below $300...

Search Articles:
browse...

Classifieds

Buy, sell, or trade! Browse the ads or post your own!

© 2020, Source of Title.