A deed I pulled for a current owner search the other day contained the following legal description:
""All that certain property situated in the Township of Rayburn in the County of Armstrong and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, being more fully described in a fee simple Deed dated ----, and recorded ----, among the land records of the County and State set forth above, in Record Book ---, Page ---.
BEING known and designated as Tax Parcel ID #--------."
This was a deed from Fannie Mae to an individual, and I include a full copy of said deed in the price of my search. The client is objecting to the fact that I charged a trip fee when he asked me to go back to that county and pull a copy of the metes and bounds description from the prior deed. I told him I'd eat it this time, but he seems to think that I should have included it with the original search, and that all of his other searchers would have included it. It's never been an issue in all the years I've been doing this.
Any thoughts on this?
Regards,
Scott Perry
to post a reply:
login - or -
register