The comment "changed names over the years" may raise a flag with some on
this site, as you can determine from the fact that some have cited examples
of being "shafted" by those who didn't pay their bills to abstractors and then
somehow came back with a CHANGED NAME. Who owns the company now?
I'm sure you know, as Robert could explain, the RA is only the person upon
whom process of service is to be done, not who may be responsible for paying
any judgments won against the company.
to post a reply:
login - or -
register