While I agree that an abstractor should not give legal advice, I do not agree that they should never explain a search. Sometimes, they get complicated and there is nothing wrong with helping the client understand your search. In fact, I think it is part of the job.
An abstractor should have no problem explaining why they showed certain encumbrances, or how the abstractor arrived at a conclusion that a partuicular individual acquired (or still has) an interest in the property. Sometimes, it isn't always obvious.
Best,
Robert A. Franco
SOURCE OF TITLE
to post a reply:
login - or -
register