So, party A deeded into party B a year ago.  The WD -- which was prepared by a lawyer, not a title company -- has an attachment that simply states that the grantee agrees to assume the mortgage at liber/page blah blah. 

Only there is a non-assumable without permission clause on that VA loan.

Should there have been something recorded regarding VA's approval of the assumption?  If there WASN'T such agreement, did the lawyer just plain blow it or were they capitalizing on a loophole:  The mortgage itself does not appear to have that non-assumable clause we all see now in all caps on the first page of the mortgage.  The non-assumable verbiage is only on the RIDERS (which are attached to the mortgage).

What do you think?  Anyone run into this before?