Register
Log In
Forget your Password?

Home
Directory
Bulletins
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Links
Classifieds
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
FAQ
Privacy Policy


Discussion
<< get older messagesget newer messages >>
to post a message: login - or - register | search messages | hide all replies



First Merit Settlement Services, Inc...... - Matt Papsch/MD
10/31/2005 4:02:57 PM (3470 views)
Re: First Merit Settlement Services, Inc...... - Annette Dorty/PA
10/31/2005 6:36:32 PM (4961 views)
Re: First Merit Settlement Services, Inc...... - Kurt deVries/FL
11/1/2005 11:03:33 AM (5000 views)
Re: First Merit Settlement Services, Inc...... - Laurie E/MD
11/1/2005 4:25:18 PM (4842 views)
Re: First Merit Settlement Services, Inc...... - Matt Papsch/MD
11/1/2005 10:52:12 PM (4783 views)

You mean I have to pay for it?? - Robert Franco/OH
10/31/2005 1:25:11 PM (3081 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Matthew DeLand/NY
10/31/2005 1:39:14 PM (5027 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - David Nixon/MA
10/31/2005 4:56:47 PM (4868 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Rachel Malone/PA
11/1/2005 7:18:01 AM (4731 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Kevin Ahern/CT
11/1/2005 8:25:04 AM (4886 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Kurt deVries/FL
11/1/2005 11:00:56 AM (4750 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Kelli Gorman/TX
11/1/2005 12:59:42 PM (4763 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - David Nixon/MA
11/1/2005 2:27:05 PM (4823 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - george Hubka/MI
11/3/2005 5:37:02 AM (4745 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Kelli Gorman/TX
11/6/2005 1:39:05 AM (4771 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - george Hubka/MI
11/3/2005 5:24:23 AM (4707 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 1:40:35 PM (4774 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Phyllis Agan/GA
11/5/2005 1:00:14 PM (4699 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Scott Perry/PA
11/5/2005 3:11:22 PM (4719 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - David Bloys/TX
11/5/2005 6:24:53 PM (4709 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Scott Perry/PA
11/5/2005 10:12:02 PM (4793 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - David Bloys/TX
11/6/2005 8:39:14 AM (4767 views)

Red Vision article on SOT - Donna Grady/NC
10/30/2005 1:05:13 AM (3456 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/30/2005 6:03:27 AM (5024 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 9:55:34 AM (4984 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/30/2005 11:01:49 AM (4966 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/30/2005 11:10:18 AM (4923 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Jan Forster/NC
10/30/2005 11:20:44 AM (4964 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 11:57:34 AM (5031 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 11:47:41 AM (4746 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 11:40:40 AM (6723 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/30/2005 12:26:09 PM (5046 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 12:56:30 PM (5147 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Donna Grady/NC
10/30/2005 10:07:33 PM (4886 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 10:42:07 PM (4972 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Matthew DeLand/NY
10/31/2005 1:25:57 PM (4908 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Robert Franco/OH
10/31/2005 1:59:55 PM (5022 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Matthew DeLand/NY
10/31/2005 2:44:27 PM (5102 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Jan Forster/NC
10/31/2005 3:01:15 PM (4836 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/31/2005 11:07:46 PM (4714 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Kevin Ahern/CT
11/2/2005 7:52:40 AM (4767 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Michaela Urban/OH
11/3/2005 1:48:08 PM (4709 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Kevin Ahern/CT
11/3/2005 3:49:00 PM (4682 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Michaela Urban/OH
11/3/2005 10:06:55 PM (4797 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 11:57:20 PM (4665 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Barbara Bennett/IN
11/4/2005 3:07:08 PM (4799 views)

TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/29/2005 12:25:52 PM (3379 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/29/2005 1:58:01 PM (5098 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/29/2005 3:46:53 PM (4799 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - monica froese/ME
10/29/2005 9:07:18 PM (4991 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/29/2005 10:02:46 PM (4833 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Jason Sheppard/PA
10/30/2005 2:46:39 AM (7088 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - J.T. Shoemaker/NY
10/30/2005 7:36:04 PM (4946 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - george Hubka/MI
10/31/2005 7:42:19 AM (4973 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Jason Sheppard/PA
10/31/2005 11:17:12 AM (5283 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/31/2005 6:39:59 PM (4837 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/31/2005 9:32:44 PM (4949 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/31/2005 9:20:01 PM (4869 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/31/2005 9:44:44 PM (4876 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/31/2005 9:25:59 PM (4770 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - J.T. Shoemaker/NY
11/1/2005 6:02:23 PM (4726 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
11/1/2005 7:47:31 PM (4707 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Tammy Knight/MO
11/1/2005 11:05:20 PM (4766 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Tammy Knight/MO
11/1/2005 11:10:38 PM (4734 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
11/2/2005 7:47:20 AM (4839 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Jason Sheppard/PA
11/2/2005 3:06:05 PM (4830 views)

e-mail solicitation - christine/MA
10/28/2005 2:40:31 PM (3110 views)
Re: e-mail solicitation - Robert Franco/OH
10/28/2005 2:58:15 PM (5228 views)
Re: e-mail solicitation - Jacqueline Quaresimo/PA
10/29/2005 3:20:56 PM (4683 views)
Re: e-mail solicitation - Jason Sheppard/PA
10/30/2005 3:13:40 AM (4725 views)


Real Title Services


QUESTION FOR F. LEE... - Scott Perry/PA
10/27/2005 5:28:13 PM (3121 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR F. LEE... - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/27/2005 7:00:49 PM (5235 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR F. LEE... - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/28/2005 6:33:17 AM (5421 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR F. LEE... - Jay Duncan/MO
10/28/2005 8:32:35 AM (5392 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR F. LEE... - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/28/2005 9:34:25 AM (5353 views)

C2C - Smitty Strickland/SC
10/27/2005 5:02:32 PM (3165 views)
Re: C2C - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/27/2005 5:24:29 PM (5581 views)
Re: C2C - Smitty Strickland/SC
10/27/2005 6:57:18 PM (5536 views)
Re: C2C - Anne Gilbert/VT
10/30/2005 10:35:27 AM (5434 views)
Re: C2C - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/30/2005 11:02:38 AM (5137 views)
Re: C2C - Jan Forster/NC
10/30/2005 11:16:02 AM (5092 views)
Re: C2C - Barbara Bennett/IN
10/30/2005 7:04:52 PM (5299 views)

The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
10/27/2005 3:04:25 PM (3738 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
10/27/2005 5:01:27 PM (5195 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - george Hubka/MI
10/27/2005 8:19:11 PM (5559 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
10/27/2005 11:36:45 PM (5437 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - LAWANDA MCMILLIAN/AR
10/28/2005 9:04:13 AM (5563 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
10/28/2005 11:55:35 AM (5630 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jason Sheppard/PA
10/30/2005 3:36:45 AM (5157 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Scott Perry/PA
10/30/2005 8:28:20 AM (5022 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
10/30/2005 4:15:44 PM (7342 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jason Sheppard/PA
10/31/2005 11:18:07 AM (5148 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/31/2005 6:53:37 PM (5153 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
11/1/2005 10:00:35 AM (5111 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Tammy Knight/MO
11/1/2005 11:33:33 PM (5100 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - J Nisonger/CA
11/2/2005 4:42:30 AM (5070 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
11/2/2005 9:41:53 AM (6903 views)

Tammy,

There was a long hard discussion when NALTEA was being set up on who was going to be allowed to join, mainly based on years of experience.  In the end it was decided and accepted at the first conference that an abstractor, reguardless of experience could join, provided they fulfill the other membership requirements.  That is also why there are four different types of membership.  Please read the Code of Regulations http://www.naltea.org/code_of_regulations.pdf and you will see that to be a full member 70% of your income must come from abstract/title searching, etc...

NALTEA was not set up to oversee or run anyones business and not every member will agree on what NALTEA supports or does.  It would be pie-in-the-sky thinking if thought ever crossed anyone's mind.  Please read the mission statement of NALTEA in that same link.

NALTEA is an association that shows the industry that we, as abstractors, a) exist
 
b) care about what direction the industry is taking.

c) care about the training, or lack of training, that exist.

d) cares about how abstract work affects the consumer.

There is a Code of Ethics that you can view at http://www.naltea.org/ethics.pdf.  Those are the ethics that NALTEA goes by.  If someone believes those ethics have been violated then report it.  It is not an ethics violation just because one does not agree with a business approach.  NALTEA encourges people to step it up to the next notch.  NALTEA is not here to punish people.

Next there is another step in NALTEA to set one's self apart from other abstractors and that is the NALTEA Certification Program.  A lot of people have worked very hard on this and we are nearing the final review for this process.

Back to your questions:
The one thing that keeps our small biz from joining, is the fact that there doesn't seem to be any screening process for who you accept It's not so much what can NALTEA do for our company, but is my company going to rise a notch respectfully by being a member; because other companies know that not just anyone can get in.

Yes there is a screening process as outlined on the application and the Codie of Regulations.  Your statement reflects, yes you want something out it.  How can any company look down on you for joining an association that wants to improve abstractors and their part of the industry as a whole.

Are you going to not accept renewals from members that do exactly what NALTEA discourages and so on. If I join something, I want it to be deserved.

As long a member follows the Code of Regulations and Code of Ethics.  Again this goes back to abstractors are not going to agree on everything.

Has NALTEA ever turned anyone away or not let them renew their membership??  

As of this date NALTEA has not had to turn down any application that has been sent in.  Most abstractors that look to join NALTEA have good intentions.

If you are looking for an excuse not to join, there are a million of them.  There were a million of excuses not to put NALTEA together in the first place. 

But, there was a need to put NALTEA together and there is a need for abstractors to join NALTEA is they want to see any kind of positive change in the industry for abstractors and the consumer.

I hope I answered your questions.

Jay Duncan

to post a reply: login - or - register


Re: The Future of the Industry - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 3:15:16 AM (5143 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
11/3/2005 10:08:57 AM (6926 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
11/3/2005 10:51:28 AM (5167 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
11/3/2005 11:05:37 AM (5063 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Patrick Scott/IL
11/3/2005 12:09:46 PM (5023 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 12:58:57 PM (4978 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Patrick Scott/IL
11/3/2005 1:51:58 PM (5098 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
11/3/2005 2:16:46 PM (4990 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Langdon Knight/MO
11/3/2005 5:31:39 PM (5056 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Langdon Knight/MO
11/3/2005 5:31:40 PM (5034 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Langdon Knight/MO
11/3/2005 5:34:10 PM (5085 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
11/3/2005 5:09:11 PM (5060 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 5:42:30 PM (4953 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
11/3/2005 6:01:28 PM (4889 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 6:29:59 PM (5002 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Douglas Gallant/OH
11/3/2005 6:52:44 PM (5061 views)

Electronic storage - Deborah Manion/VA
10/27/2005 9:58:43 AM (3098 views)
Re: Electronic storage - Jay Duncan/MO
10/27/2005 10:16:46 AM (7578 views)
Re: Electronic storage - David Bloys/TX
10/27/2005 12:10:20 PM (7708 views)
Re: Electronic storage - Robert Franco/OH
10/27/2005 12:10:48 PM (7570 views)
Re: Electronic storage - Jay Duncan/MO
10/27/2005 12:17:05 PM (5506 views)
Re: Electronic storage - David Bloys/TX
10/27/2005 12:24:20 PM (5425 views)
Re: Electronic storage - Robert Franco/OH
10/27/2005 1:05:46 PM (7861 views)
Re: Electronic storage - Deborah Manion/VA
10/27/2005 3:58:05 PM (5252 views)

Starting your own business - Angela Glass/MD
10/25/2005 8:49:48 PM (3255 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Jay Duncan/MO
10/25/2005 9:10:51 PM (7535 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Loretta Reed/MD
10/26/2005 8:18:36 AM (5732 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Angela Glass/MD
10/26/2005 9:05:53 AM (5541 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/26/2005 11:24:06 AM (5671 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Kurt deVries/FL
10/26/2005 3:40:05 PM (5594 views)
Re: Starting your own business - george Hubka/MI
10/27/2005 8:31:07 PM (5512 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Kurt deVries/FL
10/28/2005 11:26:19 AM (5516 views)

Passing... - Jay Duncan/MO
10/24/2005 3:24:08 PM (3249 views)
Re: Passing... - Scott Perry/PA
10/24/2005 5:07:51 PM (5501 views)
Re: Passing... - Kurt deVries/FL
10/25/2005 11:04:13 AM (5515 views)

Abstractors Aid In New Orleans' Recovery - Jarrod Clabaugh/OH
10/24/2005 10:19:12 AM (4264 views)
Re: Abstractors Aid In New Orleans' Recovery - Heather St. Amant/LA
11/14/2005 7:59:00 PM (5055 views)
Re: Abstractors Aid In New Orleans' Recovery - James "Lin" Toney/MS
11/14/2005 9:16:55 PM (5131 views)

Hey Kurt! - J Nisonger/CA
10/24/2005 12:06:20 AM (3209 views)
Re: Hey Kurt! - Kurt deVries/FL
10/24/2005 9:37:58 AM (5876 views)
Re: Hey Kurt! - J Nisonger/CA
10/25/2005 10:43:14 PM (5800 views)
Re: Hey Kurt! - Kurt deVries/FL
10/26/2005 9:31:29 AM (5833 views)

Whine, whine, whine... - Jay Duncan/MO
10/23/2005 10:43:57 PM (4396 views)
Re: Whine, whine, whine... - Jay Duncan/MO
10/23/2005 10:48:42 PM (5658 views)
Re: Whine, whine, whine... - Langdon Knight/MO
10/24/2005 1:26:33 AM (5563 views)
Re: Whine, whine, whine... - Deborah Manion/VA
10/24/2005 9:20:18 AM (5985 views)
Re: Whine, whine, whine... - Patrick Scott/IL
10/24/2005 11:23:40 AM (5941 views)
Re: Whine, whine, whine... - Scott Perry/PA
10/24/2005 9:33:41 PM (5951 views)
Re: Whine, whine, whine... - Patrick Scott/IL
10/24/2005 10:45:40 PM (5914 views)

Here we go again!! - Kurt deVries/FL
10/21/2005 3:38:08 PM (3351 views)
Re: Here we go again!! - Scott Perry/PA
10/21/2005 4:15:36 PM (5774 views)
Re: Here we go again!! - Kurt deVries/FL
10/21/2005 4:23:57 PM (5873 views)
Re: Here we go again!! - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/21/2005 4:54:04 PM (6109 views)
Re: Here we go again!! - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/23/2005 3:54:46 PM (6111 views)


<< get older messagesget newer messages >>

DISCLAIMER: These Message Forums are un-moderated and Source of Title does not endorse the content of any of the posts. Source of Title discourages libelous comments and you, as the sole creator of the content, take full responsibility for your remarks.
Directory

The Source of Title Business directory has 8961 listed companies.

Leave feedback on a company:
SOT ID #:  learn more...
DRN Title Search
Blogs

Read other users' blogs-- or start your own!

Most Recent Blog Posts:

Understanding O&E Title Searches
Security American's Blog
2025/10/29
0 comments

AI Powered Title Plant
Michael Gigliotti's Blog
2025/10/23
0 comments

New to Property Shielding? Here’s Your Guide!
Marissa Berends's Blog
2025/10/22
0 comments

Articles

Source of Title articles help to keep you informed on the state of the title industry.

National Association of REALTORS® Appoints First-Ever Chief Data Officer to Advance Innovation and Member Value
"Data is one of NAR's most important strategic assets – and the way we structure and use it will shape where our a...
Stewart Strengthens Real Estate Services Portfolio by Announcing its Intent to Acquire Mortgage Contracting Services (MCS)
“We are pleased to announce our intent to acquire MCS and look forward to being able to offer property preservatio...
NAHB and NARI Offer Guidance for Working with Remodelers
“The sudden closures of remodeling firms around the country underscore the critical importance of integrity and ac...
Home Prices Increased in 77% of Metro Areas in Third Quarter of 2025
Home prices rose in 77% of metro markets (176 out of 230) during the third quarter of 2025, according to the National As...
First-Time Home Buyer Share Falls to Historic Low of 21%, Median Age Rises to 40
"The historically low share of first-time buyers underscores the real-world consequences of a housing market starved for...

Search Articles:
browse...

Classifieds

Buy, sell, or trade! Browse the ads or post your own!

© 2020, Source of Title.