Register
Log In
Forget your Password?

Home
Directory
Bulletins
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Links
Classifieds
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
FAQ
Privacy Policy


Discussion
<< get older messagesget newer messages >>
to post a message: login - or - register | search messages | hide all replies



So, You Want To Out-Source Overseas??? - Jay Duncan/MO
7/7/2005 12:49:46 PM (3426 views)
Re: So, You Want To Out-Source Overseas??? - Jay Duncan/MO
7/7/2005 4:11:52 PM (4897 views)
Re: So, You Want To Out-Source Overseas??? - David Bloys/TX
7/10/2005 10:48:55 PM (5826 views)

Nationwide Title Clearing - Danielle Nelson/WI
7/7/2005 10:27:44 AM (2582 views)
Re: Nationwide Title Clearing - Never Again!!! - Jay Duncan/MO
7/7/2005 12:47:25 PM (3496 views)
Re: Nationwide Title Clearing - Never Again!!! - LAWANDA MCMILLIAN/AR
7/7/2005 4:02:56 PM (3216 views)
Re: Nationwide Title Clearing - Never Again!!! - george Hubka/MI
7/7/2005 11:06:30 PM (3057 views)
Re: Nationwide Title Clearing - Never Again!!! - LAWANDA MCMILLIAN/AR
7/8/2005 8:18:14 AM (3058 views)
Re: Nationwide Title Clearing - Never Again!!! - Bannon Lucas/FL
7/15/2005 11:30:07 AM (3090 views)
Re: Nationwide Title Clearing - Never Again!!! - Robert Franco/OH
7/15/2005 12:41:55 PM (3025 views)
Re: Nationwide Title Clearing - Never Again!!! - Lisa Ramsey/TX
7/16/2005 2:31:48 PM (2874 views)
Re: Nationwide Title Clearing - Never Again!!! - Jay Duncan/MO
7/16/2005 11:02:26 PM (2895 views)
Re: Nationwide Title Clearing - Never Again!!! - Jay Duncan/MO
7/19/2005 10:45:01 AM (2908 views)
Re: Nationwide Title Clearing - Never Again!!! - Bannon Lucas/FL
7/20/2005 4:35:33 PM (3110 views)

Abstractor Software... - Robert Franco/OH
7/6/2005 5:03:56 PM (1946 views)

Texas Courthouses - Lisa Ramsey/TX
7/2/2005 1:06:43 PM (1980 views)

Women in business resource - J Nisonger/CA
7/1/2005 11:55:16 AM (2946 views)


Real Title Services


Searcher Liability Question - Larry Crooks/OH
6/29/2005 4:02:29 PM (2482 views)
Re: Searcher Liability Question - Kevin Ahern/CT
6/29/2005 5:03:27 PM (2976 views)
Re: Searcher Liability Question - Robert Franco/OH
6/29/2005 7:17:46 PM (3047 views)
Re: Searcher Liability Question - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/29/2005 11:39:52 PM (3160 views)
Re: Searcher Liability Question - Larry Crooks/OH
6/30/2005 6:49:16 AM (3093 views)
Re: Searcher Liability Question - Kevin Ahern/CT
6/30/2005 8:41:48 AM (3385 views)
Re: Searcher Liability Question - Robert Franco/OH
6/30/2005 10:05:58 AM (3228 views)
Re: Searcher Liability Question - Larry Crooks/OH
6/30/2005 12:37:48 PM (3063 views)
Re: Searcher Liability Question - Regina Engebritson Engebritson/MN
8/10/2005 8:33:33 PM (2996 views)

reporting tax status on searches - christine/MA
6/29/2005 9:02:48 AM (2465 views)
Re: reporting tax status on searches - ANDREW MOLLER/CT
6/29/2005 10:45:43 AM (3025 views)
Re: reporting tax status on searches - Steve Schneider/IN
6/29/2005 12:48:32 PM (3003 views)
Re: reporting tax status on searches - Danielle Nelson/WI
6/29/2005 12:58:02 PM (2907 views)
Re: reporting tax status on searches - Scott Perry/PA
6/29/2005 5:45:48 PM (2922 views)
Re: reporting tax status on searches - Kim Haase/MT
6/30/2005 1:26:31 AM (3220 views)

In Response to Robert's Thread of 6/24 - J.T. Shoemaker/NY
6/27/2005 9:16:08 AM (3050 views)

Mr Davis and his claims - James "Lin" Toney/MS
6/26/2005 11:23:26 PM (2480 views)
Re: Mr Davis and his claims - J.T. Shoemaker/NY
6/27/2005 9:20:06 AM (3047 views)
Re: Mr Davis and his claims - Deborah Manion/VA
6/27/2005 9:39:35 AM (3020 views)
Re: Mr Davis and his claims - James "Lin" Toney/MS
6/27/2005 5:18:18 PM (2878 views)
Re: Mr Davis and his claims - J.T. Shoemaker/NY
6/27/2005 8:37:06 PM (2978 views)
Re: Mr Davis and his claims - David Chisolm/MS
6/30/2005 5:12:56 PM (3034 views)
Re: Mr Davis and his claims - James "Lin" Toney/MS
6/30/2005 6:21:49 PM (3037 views)
Re: Mr Davis and his claims - James "Lin" Toney/MS
7/2/2005 12:17:02 AM (3083 views)

QUESTION FOR TECHIES - Scott Perry/PA
6/26/2005 10:21:53 PM (2328 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR TECHIES - Robert Franco/OH
6/27/2005 12:54:39 AM (3037 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR TECHIES - Christy Rathbun/CT
6/27/2005 2:00:24 AM (3029 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR TECHIES - Scott Perry/PA
6/30/2005 7:14:47 PM (3401 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR TECHIES - Cherie Smurthwaite/CA
6/30/2005 10:01:20 PM (3271 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR TECHIES - J Nisonger/CA
7/1/2005 1:11:29 PM (3365 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR TECHIES - Robert Franco/OH
7/1/2005 3:33:03 PM (3178 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR TECHIES - Scott Perry/PA
7/2/2005 12:21:20 PM (3227 views)

Non-payment for services rendered - Serena Stout/VA
6/24/2005 12:08:53 PM (2785 views)
Re: Non-payment for services rendered - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/24/2005 1:39:21 PM (6785 views)
Re: Non-payment for services rendered - Kevin Ahern/CT
6/24/2005 2:55:09 PM (3415 views)

If they have not complained to you about your work, have not paid you and have not responded to your demands for payment, they are most likely experiencing financial difficulties. The first thing you need to do is find out if they are still in business. If they have gone belly up or are insolvent any court judgment you obtain against them will be difficult to collect. The court does not act as a collection agency. It determines whether a debt is justly owed. If the defendant has no assets, you can not get blood out of a stone. If you do obtain a worthwhile judgment against them you need to follow your state's procedue to enforce the judgment. Usually that means having an execution (court order) issued by the court for a small fee which empowers a sheriff/marshal or other law enforcement official to levy on a bank account, wages, accounts receivable or to seize and sell non-exempt personal property to pay your judgment.

If you determine that the defendant is solvent, and worth suing, you next need to determine whether you were dealing with a corporation, limited liability company, general partnership, limited partnership or individual. Each has slightly different requirements for service of process depending on the state in which you or they reside. If you are within the jurisdiction of small claims court, the requirements of service of process are relatively simple.It is set up for people to proceed on their own without attorneys in the most simple way possible. Usually in small claims cases it is only a matter of paying a small filing fee, filing the complaint, and showing up to testify on the day of trial.  

If on the other hand the amount of your claim puts you up into the next tier of court (Superior Court in Connecticut), you will almost certainly need a lawyer because you will be held accountable to the same rules of evidence and civil procedure as a lawyer. If your own company is a corporation, limited liability company or other entity recognized by your state as having a legal identity separate from you personally, you will almost certainly need a lawyer because in most states a non-lawyer cannot represent these entities without engaging in an unauthorized practice of law. In Connecticut an exception is made for small claims court. 

In any event you will need to know the exact name of your client in order to write it on the court pleadings. This is important because if you win your case, and want the court to issue an execution, you will want the execution to match the client's name on the bank account, wages or accounts receivable that you are garnishing. This is also true as to the name on the defendant's personal property to be sold or the deed for real estate that is to be taken or sold at public auction after foreclosure to pay your judgment. Very often you can get this information by checking the webpage for the Secretary of State in which the defendant is located. There are also other sources for this information.

Now that you have determined that the defendant is solvent and worth suing ,and have determined the exact name of the defendant, you have to decide where to sue the defendant. If the defendant is located in the same state as your business, you can sue him in your state without too much of a problem. If the defendant is located in a different state, has not appointed the Secretary of State for your State or some other entity in your state to receive service of process or has not  engaged in other conduct which would render him subject to the jurisdiction of your state's court,  you will probably need to sue the defendant in his native state. There was a very long discussion on this issue last month on this board. If you do a search it may answer a number of your questions.

If the defendant is located in a foreign state, choosing a court in which to sue him may be a dilema. If you sue the defendant in your state, he is almost certain to test the jurisdiction of the court with a motion to dismiss. That is the first question that any good defense attorney will ask when he represents a client located outside the forum state. However, the defendant may not be represented by counsel, and may not know enough to file this motion or he may otherwise submit to the jurisdiction of your state's court. You may or may not win. If you lose on this issue you will need to refile the case in the court of the Defendant's native state. You will then need to pay the court's filing fee and any associated expenses for service of process a second time.  In my opinion a plaintiff is always better off suing a foreign defendant in his native state because it eliminates the defendant's ability to challenge the court's jurisdiction on the basis of his location.

If you win the suit the courts of most states will allow you to recover your filing fees and sheriff's/marshal's fee for service of process in addition to your damages.

You will also almost certainly be able to collect legal interest on the amount of the judgment if the defendant fails to pay your judgment immediately. In some states the interest will accrue from the date of judgment. In other states it will accrue from an earlier date. You can actually make money on the deal, and recover some of the costs of litigation through the legal interest. I won a case several years ago in which the defendant delayed in paying the judgment. By that time another $1,300.00 in legal interest had accrued. I found a really vicious female marshal to serve the property execution. She threw on  another 10% of the judgment on top of it for her fee. We received payment in full within a matter of days after she served the execution.

However, waiting to collect your judgment can be a gamble if the defendant is experiencing money problems. In this case you would want to execute on the judgment immediately. Whether you wait or proceed immediately to execute the judgment, you will want to secure the judgment by immediately filing/recording a judgment lien with the appropriate authority. In Connecticut that would be the Secretary of State for personal property and the Town Clerk in which the defendant's real estate is located. Filing/recording the judgment lien will protect you as a secured creditor in the event that the defendant bankrupts. It will also make it difficult for him to sell real estate or personal property with the lien attached to it or the buyer may become subject to the payment of your judgment. It will also impact on his credit rating if he is applying for a loan or other extension of credit.

Whether you can also recover attorney's fees depends on the law of the state in which the court is located. In Connecticut for instance you would need to have a written contract or statute that provided for recovery of attorney's fees, but the laws of the state in which you sue the defendant may differ. There are also alternate theories of recovery other than contract breach which may provide for the recovery of attorney's fees.

If you have to sue the defendant in another state and need an attorney it is a simple matter of making a telephone call to a law firm in the defendant's location. Law firms are very used to getting calls like this from out of state client's, and legal representation can be easily arranged. You will need to travel to the other state to testify at trial, and there will be travel expenses involved. You will need to consider whether this expense is justified by the amount you are trying to collect when making a decision as to whether or not to sue the defendant. However, in debt collection cases the defendant very often folds up, defaults and loses immediately by not appearing in the case or not pleading a response to your complaint. In this situation it becomes very easy to obtain your judgment at minimal expense.

So, to summarize:

1.     Determine if the defendant is still in business or insolvent.

2.     Make certain that you have the exact name of the defendant
        drafted on your court pleadings and executions. Do not use part 
        of the corporate name or limited liability company. Very often
        people forget to include the "Inc." or the "LLC" after the 
        defendant's name. Do not sue the defendant under a trade 
        name or fictitious name alone.

3.     Decide in which state to sue the defendant, and then observe the
        procedures of that court.

4.    If you win, have the court issue the appropriate order (An execution 
       in Connecticut) to enforce the judgment, and refer it to the appropriate 
       authority for collection.

This probably seems like a lot of information to digest, but that's the legal biz.

to post a reply: login - or - register


Serena, is that you - Shannon Blatt/VA
6/24/2005 3:57:51 PM (3155 views)

The worst invention ever! - Robert Franco/OH
6/24/2005 9:32:21 AM (2637 views)
Re: The worst invention ever! - Jay Duncan/MO
6/24/2005 9:44:30 AM (3187 views)
Re: The worst invention ever! - David Nixon/MA
6/24/2005 12:08:29 PM (3152 views)
Re: The worst invention ever! - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/24/2005 9:49:59 AM (3190 views)
Re: The worst invention ever! - Shannon Blatt/VA
6/24/2005 3:55:26 PM (3075 views)
Re: The worst invention ever! - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/24/2005 4:48:38 PM (3095 views)
Re: The worst invention ever! - Kelly Chamblee/OH
6/27/2005 5:37:53 PM (2939 views)
Re: The worst invention ever! - Norean/GA
7/1/2005 6:19:22 PM (3007 views)
Re: The worst invention ever! - Lisa Ramsey/TX
7/2/2005 1:04:32 PM (3401 views)
Re: The worst invention ever! - Jeanne Mendes/CA
8/30/2005 5:41:59 AM (2901 views)

Sorry.... - Jason Sheppard/PA
6/23/2005 5:33:58 PM (1931 views)

TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/23/2005 10:36:17 AM (3631 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Kim Haase/MT
6/23/2005 11:50:43 AM (3169 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/23/2005 12:15:19 PM (3262 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - David Bloys/TX
6/23/2005 12:58:16 PM (3133 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - David Bloys/TX
6/23/2005 1:50:32 PM (5982 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/23/2005 1:55:43 PM (5742 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/23/2005 2:02:08 PM (3163 views)
THANK YOU TO LISA & DAVID - Kim Haase/MT
6/24/2005 3:27:52 AM (3121 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Jonathan Figliuolo/NY
6/27/2005 3:14:02 PM (2877 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/27/2005 6:46:02 PM (2950 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Scott Perry/PA
6/28/2005 8:01:17 AM (2940 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/28/2005 11:29:35 AM (2795 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - David Bloys/TX
6/28/2005 3:04:43 PM (5701 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Robert Franco/OH
6/28/2005 3:22:23 PM (2869 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Scott Perry/PA
6/28/2005 11:40:25 PM (2899 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/29/2005 11:23:17 AM (2949 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Scott Perry/PA
6/29/2005 11:17:46 PM (3039 views)

Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Patrick Scott/IL
6/22/2005 6:10:51 PM (2521 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - David Bloys/TX
6/23/2005 11:39:44 AM (3114 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Robert Franco/OH
6/23/2005 1:55:44 PM (3242 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Ellen Malloy/MO
6/23/2005 9:21:20 PM (3118 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Patrick Scott/IL
6/24/2005 12:06:26 PM (3108 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Robert Franco/OH
6/24/2005 12:56:46 PM (2866 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Patrick Scott/IL
6/24/2005 3:12:14 PM (3036 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Shannon Blatt/VA
6/24/2005 4:05:54 PM (2916 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Robert Franco/OH
6/25/2005 2:14:51 PM (3032 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Patrick Scott/IL
6/27/2005 2:48:58 PM (2948 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Robert Franco/OH
6/27/2005 3:35:47 PM (2887 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Jay Duncan/MO
6/27/2005 5:37:43 PM (2969 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Douglas Gallant/OH
6/26/2005 6:07:23 PM (2909 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Mark Russomanno/NJ
6/25/2005 11:59:33 PM (2882 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Kevin Ahern/CT
6/26/2005 7:49:42 AM (2822 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - David Bloys/TX
6/26/2005 9:29:36 AM (2917 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Kevin Ahern/CT
6/26/2005 1:02:56 PM (2983 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - David Bloys/TX
6/26/2005 4:01:20 PM (2880 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Kevin Ahern/CT
6/26/2005 4:38:20 PM (2888 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Patrick Scott/IL
6/27/2005 3:03:57 PM (2847 views)


<< get older messagesget newer messages >>

DISCLAIMER: These Message Forums are un-moderated and Source of Title does not endorse the content of any of the posts. Source of Title discourages libelous comments and you, as the sole creator of the content, take full responsibility for your remarks.
Directory

The Source of Title Business directory has 8961 listed companies.

Leave feedback on a company:
SOT ID #:  learn more...
DRN Title Search
Blogs

Read other users' blogs-- or start your own!

Most Recent Blog Posts:

Shared Driveway Agreements
Marissa Berends's Blog
2025/12/10
0 comments

Explain It Like I’m 5: FIRPTA Edition
Marissa Berends's Blog
2025/12/03
0 comments

Home buyers are more active this fall.....
Michael Stelzer's Blog
2025/11/27
0 comments

Articles

Source of Title articles help to keep you informed on the state of the title industry.

Mortgage Applications Decrease in Latest MBA Weekly Survey
“Overall mortgage application volume fell last week, despite the slight decline in mortgage rates,” said Mik...
NAR Existing-Home Sales Report Shows 0.5% Increase in November
"Existing-home sales increased for the third straight month due to lower mortgage rates this autumn," said NAR Chief Eco...
Department of Justice Files Statement of Interest Supporting Competition Among Real Estate Brokerages
“Purchasing a home is the single biggest purchase most Americans make in a lifetime,” said Assistant Attorne...
Mortgage Applications Decrease in Latest MBA Weekly Survey
“Mortgage rates inched up last week following the FOMC meeting, as investors interpreted the comments to signal th...
MBA Applauds House Financial Services Committee Advancement of the Housing for the 21st Century Act, NFIP Extension Bill
“This legislation advances several long-standing MBA priorities, including updates to FHA multifamily loan limits,...

Search Articles:
browse...

Classifieds

Buy, sell, or trade! Browse the ads or post your own!

Looking for Abstractors in SD 12/27
December 27 2025
Hello, I have the following orders in SD in the following counties: Buffalo(3), Charles Mix(1),Codington(1), Dewey(9), Lyman(1) Oglala Lokota(4), Pennington(1), Roberts(4), and Todd(2). This is a total of 26 orders. I am doing consistent business inn...[more info]

email
© 2020, Source of Title.