Register
Log In
Forget your Password?

Home
Directory
Bulletins
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Links
Classifieds
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
FAQ
Privacy Policy


Discussion
<< get older messagesget newer messages >>
to post a message: login - or - register | search messages | hide all replies



Where will you be? - Jay Duncan/MO
11/15/2004 11:18:15 PM (2774 views)
Re: Where will you be? - Robert Franco/OH
11/16/2004 3:27:06 PM (4413 views)

IMPORTANT PLEASE READ - Mr. Donald Hall/NC
11/15/2004 8:58:08 PM (2931 views)
Re: IMPORTANT PLEASE READ - Lisa Ramsey/TX
11/15/2004 11:21:07 PM (4699 views)
Re: IMPORTANT PLEASE READ - Shannon Blatt/VA
11/15/2004 11:46:37 PM (4610 views)
Re: IMPORTANT PLEASE READ - Robert Franco/OH
11/16/2004 12:16:17 AM (4953 views)
Re: IMPORTANT PLEASE READ - Shannon Blatt/VA
11/16/2004 1:15:05 AM (4616 views)
Re: IMPORTANT PLEASE READ - Judy Nisonger/CA
11/16/2004 1:38:06 AM (4552 views)
Re: IMPORTANT PLEASE READ - Judy Nisonger/CA
11/16/2004 1:36:48 AM (4613 views)
Re: IMPORTANT PLEASE READ - David Bloys/TX
11/16/2004 8:02:38 AM (4632 views)
Re: IMPORTANT PLEASE READ - Lisa Ramsey/TX
11/16/2004 8:46:45 AM (4810 views)
Re: IMPORTANT PLEASE READ - kevin ahern/CT
11/16/2004 10:44:54 AM (4667 views)
Re: IMPORTANT PLEASE READ - David Bloys/TX
11/16/2004 11:40:00 AM (4582 views)
Re: IMPORTANT PLEASE READ - Patty Bolden/TX
11/17/2004 11:41:19 AM (4575 views)
Re: IMPORTANT PLEASE READ - Slade Smith/OH
11/16/2004 9:52:39 AM (4562 views)
Re: IMPORTANT PLEASE READ - David Bloys/TX
11/16/2004 11:28:41 AM (4546 views)
Re: IMPORTANT PLEASE READ - Jay Duncan
11/16/2004 8:08:01 AM (4580 views)
Re: IMPORTANT PLEASE READ - Kurt deVries/FL
11/16/2004 9:49:24 AM (4516 views)
Re: IMPORTANT PLEASE READ - Barbara Bennett/IN
11/16/2004 10:40:56 AM (4514 views)
Re: IMPORTANT PLEASE READ - James Guill/VA
11/16/2004 2:08:45 PM (4536 views)
Re: IMPORTANT PLEASE READ - Michelle Bernard/LA
11/16/2004 3:15:52 PM (4639 views)
Re: IMPORTANT PLEASE READ - monica froese/ME
11/16/2004 6:24:04 PM (4591 views)
Re: IMPORTANT PLEASE READ - Judy Nisonger/CA
11/19/2004 6:48:00 PM (4807 views)
Re: IMPORTANT PLEASE READ - Robert Franco/OH
11/19/2004 10:10:35 PM (4570 views)
Re: IMPORTANT PLEASE READ - Judy Nisonger/CA
11/20/2004 2:13:45 AM (4578 views)

JAY - Amy Holder/NJ
11/15/2004 2:42:39 PM (2752 views)
Re: JAY - Jay Duncan
11/15/2004 5:59:48 PM (4500 views)

HOME CLOSER - Patty Bolden/TX
11/15/2004 1:17:22 PM (2737 views)
Re: HOME CLOSER - monica froese/ME
11/15/2004 6:32:01 PM (4416 views)
Re: HOME CLOSER - Renee Washington/IL
11/16/2004 8:28:06 AM (4424 views)

first snow... - monica froese/ME
11/14/2004 6:52:26 PM (2664 views)
Re: first snow... - Judy Nisonger/CA
11/15/2004 11:06:50 AM (4410 views)


Real Title Services


Contact Info for Frank Navarro, InfoTrack for Re-Bill - Oliver Chisolm, Jr/MS
11/13/2004 6:50:49 PM (2849 views)
Re: Contact Info for Frank Navarro, InfoTrack for Re-Bill - Julie Jasiunas/WI
11/14/2004 9:46:58 AM (4649 views)
Re: Contact Info for Frank Navarro, InfoTrack for Re-Bill - Lisa Ramsey/TX
11/14/2004 10:58:56 AM (4543 views)
Re: Contact Info for Frank Navarro, InfoTrack for Re-Bill - Scott Aduddell/MO
11/21/2004 4:29:33 PM (4559 views)

Working together... (more) - Robert Franco/OH
11/12/2004 6:58:04 PM (3568 views)
Re: Working together... (more) - Robert Breakell/CT
11/12/2004 7:44:19 PM (4575 views)

Should SOT Support Companies Doing Online Searches - Lisa Ramsey/TX
11/11/2004 5:13:40 PM (2696 views)
Re: Should SOT Support Companies Doing Online Searches - Shannon Blatt/VA
11/11/2004 7:56:04 PM (4567 views)
Re: Should SOT Support Companies Doing Online Searches - Robert Franco/OH
11/11/2004 8:19:39 PM (4473 views)
Re: Should SOT Support Companies Doing Online Searches - Robert Franco/OH
11/11/2004 8:07:52 PM (4423 views)
Re: Should SOT Support Companies Doing Online Searches - Amy Holder/NJ
11/12/2004 4:03:16 PM (4450 views)
Re: Should SOT Support Companies Doing Online Searches - Judy Nisonger/CA
11/13/2004 1:04:38 AM (4455 views)
Re: Should SOT Support Companies Doing Online Searches - Lisa Ramsey/TX
11/13/2004 12:45:11 PM (4505 views)
Re: Should SOT Support Companies Doing Online Searches - Judy Nisonger/CA
11/13/2004 4:48:50 PM (4465 views)
Re: Should SOT Support Companies Doing Online Searches - Jay Duncan
11/14/2004 7:22:57 PM (4324 views)
Re: Should SOT Support Companies Doing Online Searches - Lisa Ramsey/TX
11/15/2004 7:02:30 PM (4310 views)
Re: Should SOT Support Companies Doing Online Searches - Amy Holder/NJ
11/14/2004 10:09:11 PM (4495 views)
Re: Should SOT Support Companies Doing Online Searches - Lisa Ramsey/TX
11/15/2004 8:01:14 AM (4380 views)
Re: Should SOT Support Companies Doing Online Searches - Amy Holder/NJ
11/15/2004 1:25:27 PM (4375 views)
Re: Should SOT Support Companies Doing Online Searches - Judy Nisonger/CA
11/15/2004 2:25:44 PM (4340 views)
Re: Should SOT Support Companies Doing Online Searches - Lisa Ramsey/TX
11/15/2004 3:02:01 PM (4314 views)
Re: Should SOT Support Companies Doing Online Searches - Amy Holder/NJ
11/15/2004 4:21:46 PM (4388 views)
Re: Should SOT Support Companies Doing Online Searches - Lisa Ramsey/TX
11/17/2004 1:01:51 PM (4327 views)
Re: Should SOT Support Companies Doing Online Searches - Amy Holder/NJ
11/17/2004 6:06:26 PM (4358 views)
Re: Should SOT Support Companies Doing Online Searches - Lisa Ramsey/TX
11/17/2004 11:22:10 PM (4320 views)
Re: Should SOT Support Companies Doing Online Searches - Judy Nisonger/CA
11/20/2004 2:00:41 PM (4592 views)
Re: Should SOT Support Companies Doing Online Searches - Judy Nisonger/CA
11/15/2004 2:19:01 PM (4321 views)
Re: Should SOT Support Companies Doing Online Searches - Amy Holder/NJ
11/15/2004 2:33:22 PM (4321 views)
Re: Should SOT Support Companies Doing Online Searches - Douglas Gallant/OH
11/17/2004 5:10:38 PM (4317 views)
Re: Should SOT Support Companies Doing Online Searches - Amy Holder/NJ
11/17/2004 6:58:48 PM (4267 views)

IF YOU LOVE YOUR FREEDOM, THANK A "GRUNT" - Scott Perry/PA
11/11/2004 4:09:57 PM (2729 views)
Re: IF YOU LOVE YOUR FREEDOM, THANK A "GRUNT" - Jay Duncan
11/11/2004 8:56:30 PM (4186 views)

Someone STOLE..... - Michelle Bernard/LA
11/11/2004 12:02:30 PM (2820 views)
Re: Someone STOLE..... - kevin ahern/CT
11/11/2004 12:22:25 PM (4325 views)
Re: Someone STOLE..... - David Bloys/TX
11/11/2004 12:32:50 PM (4490 views)
Re: Someone STOLE..... - kevin ahern/CT
11/11/2004 12:37:41 PM (4484 views)
Re: Someone STOLE..... - Robert Breakell/CT
11/11/2004 4:07:28 PM (4404 views)
Re: Someone STOLE..... - kevin ahern/CT
11/11/2004 4:41:34 PM (4409 views)
Re: Someone STOLE..... - Loretta Reed/MD
11/11/2004 4:17:13 PM (4308 views)
Re: Someone STOLE..... - Michelle Bernard/LA
11/11/2004 6:14:56 PM (4405 views)
Re: Someone STOLE..... - Judy Nisonger/CA
11/12/2004 5:18:23 AM (4280 views)
Re: Someone STOLE..... - Judy Nisonger/CA
11/12/2004 5:19:29 AM (4367 views)
Re: Someone STOLE..... - Michelle Bernard/LA
11/12/2004 3:15:05 PM (4262 views)
I found the - Michelle Bernard/LA
11/12/2004 3:19:37 PM (4404 views)
Re: I found the - Judy Nisonger/CA
11/13/2004 1:06:49 AM (4481 views)
Re: Someone STOLE..... - Michelle Bernard/LA
11/18/2004 4:03:59 PM (4195 views)

I am a Veteran - Jay Duncan/MO
11/10/2004 11:09:37 PM (2618 views)
Re: I am a Veteran - Michelle Bernard/LA
11/11/2004 6:16:33 PM (4228 views)
Re: I am a Veteran - Kurt deVries/FL
11/17/2004 10:51:42 AM (4359 views)
Re: I am a Veteran - Jay Duncan
11/17/2004 12:13:47 PM (4334 views)
Re: I am a Veteran - Lisa Ramsey/TX
11/17/2004 12:54:55 PM (4344 views)

It is the soldier - Jay Duncan/MO
11/10/2004 10:40:58 PM (2544 views)
Re: It is the soldier - Judy Nisonger/CA
11/11/2004 3:01:31 AM (4269 views)
Re: It is the soldier - Jay Duncan
11/11/2004 8:40:24 AM (4137 views)
Re: It is the soldier - Judy Nisonger/CA
11/11/2004 10:39:56 AM (4192 views)

Skipjack - kevin ahern/CT
11/10/2004 5:00:03 PM (2767 views)
Re: Skipjack - Judy Nisonger/CA
11/10/2004 5:35:03 PM (4305 views)
Re: Skipjack - Jay Duncan/MO
11/10/2004 11:12:43 PM (4279 views)
Re: Skipjack - Judy Nisonger/CA
11/11/2004 3:09:58 AM (4196 views)
Re: Skipjack - Ellen Malloy/MO
11/11/2004 2:47:08 PM (4543 views)
Re: Skipjack - Jay Duncan
11/11/2004 2:57:11 PM (4154 views)
Re: Skipjack - Shannon Blatt/VA
11/11/2004 7:58:37 PM (4153 views)
Re: Skipjack - Jay Duncan
11/11/2004 9:02:34 PM (4136 views)
Re: Skipjack - Judy Nisonger/CA
11/12/2004 4:42:02 AM (4143 views)
Re: Skipjack - kevin ahern/CT
11/11/2004 6:15:54 AM (4193 views)
Re: Skipjack - Jay Duncan
11/11/2004 8:43:44 AM (4091 views)
Re: Skipjack - kevin ahern/CT
11/11/2004 9:12:46 AM (4205 views)
Re: Skipjack - Jay Duncan
11/11/2004 9:22:19 AM (4227 views)
Re: Skipjack - Lisa Ramsey/TX
11/11/2004 11:09:53 AM (4156 views)
Re: Skipjack - kevin ahern/CT
11/11/2004 11:35:23 AM (4179 views)
Re: Skipjack - Donna Grady/NC
11/13/2004 10:25:23 AM (4168 views)
Re: Skipjack - Lisa Ramsey/TX
11/13/2004 12:30:39 PM (4202 views)
Re: Skipjack - Scott Perry/PA
11/15/2004 9:26:48 PM (4025 views)

E&O insurance - Judy Nisonger/CA
11/10/2004 1:54:28 PM (3396 views)
Re: E&O insurance - Robert Breakell/CT
11/10/2004 7:41:02 PM (4006 views)
Re: E&O insurance - kevin ahern/CT
11/11/2004 6:04:14 AM (4046 views)
Re: E&O insurance - Robert Breakell/CT
11/11/2004 12:05:56 PM (3967 views)

Online services - Jimmy Smith/PA
11/10/2004 12:43:30 PM (2699 views)
Re: Online services - Lisa Ramsey/TX
11/10/2004 2:08:39 PM (4150 views)
Re: Online services - David Bloys/TX
11/10/2004 4:11:13 PM (4095 views)
Re: Online services - Judy Nisonger/CA
11/10/2004 4:47:35 PM (4194 views)
Re: Online services - Robert Breakell/CT
11/10/2004 7:28:19 PM (4158 views)
Re: Online services - Judy Nisonger/CA
11/10/2004 8:29:23 PM (4025 views)
Re: Online services - Lisa Ramsey/TX
11/10/2004 2:08:40 PM (4040 views)
Re: Online services - John OConnor/IL
11/11/2004 1:00:53 PM (3998 views)
Re: Online services - Lisa Ramsey/TX
11/11/2004 5:04:33 PM (3970 views)

I'm sorry that putting "facts" on the screen and online have upset some folks.  Facts are facts.  VM's, etc "have learned that there are relatively few claims in this industry" is a statement of the past.  What they are learning today is that they shouldn't have trusted everyone that said they were a qualified abstractor or tried to do the work themselves online.  The fact is there are a lot of claims in this industry today - to the point that an insurer asked me if I did nationwide abstracting because he will not insure them anymore.  When insurance becomes a problem no one is in business.  I agree that some counties have the same information but in all cases the route in order to retrieve the information is greatly hindered.  If I can't run a search by property I cannot complete the search in my state.  If I had to run a search from bank to bank to find an assignment it would take me 4 days in some cases.  And they are finding out it is not just access to information that allows a proper search it is the ability to know how to search in that particular county - that in itself can increase liability 10 fold.  I could not sit down in a nationwide office and do nationwide work without great liability.  Every single county indexes differently and has different abbreviations that if spelled completely out will come up as no records found - a huge liability to not find 380,000 judgments.  As I tell my clients, if I felt that my state's indexing was reliable and accurate - I would reduce my rates, sit down at my desk and do the work but I would never attempt to do the entire United States and their counties - that in itself is insane and too much pressure on an individual to remember all the little quirks of every counties system and indexing techniques. 

And as I said before if it comes to the point that we are all allowed to do in-house searches for lending institutions, etc. there will be no more Vendor Management companies as we know it.  You and I will cover the entire state for lending institutions ourselves - and when it comes down to it they will want someone who can cover a broad area and yet be very knowledgeable about the documents and legalities of a particular state.  It is kind of like sticking your foot in your own mouth.  You take from one industry - the industry takes from you.  Like I said our marketing (most of us) was limited to the nationwide vending companies and title companies - you take that away from us and we market direct and show the difference in the quality of the work but also the turnaround time.  If I was a lending institution I would rather work with 50 business - one for each state proficient in all the indexing, terms, laws, forms, etc. than one vending company trying to know it all and taking 2 weeks to get everything back.  And it comes down to this too - there will eventually come a time when an abstractor says no to all the hard to find orders, etc that are coming out or the lack of volume and if prices go up to meet the decline in volume - when all is said or done - they will find out it is just as cheap for us to do them all.  They will never be able to get the case that was filed yesterday by tommorrow or the certified copy federal X out in 24 hours - 60 year searches online - never will happen - I can see them taking those microfilms and putting them online - will not happen - Plats will not be online - won't happen - if you have deeds online but not probates and divorces - can't do a proper title search - and if retrievals have to go from $15.00 to $50.00 then I say that is what the industry will eventually do - I guess what I am trying to say is that don't look at this so narrow minded - with change comes change and I don't believe everyone thought out what their actions will cause everyone else to do.  Abstractors aren't going to keep going down or maintain their prices - eventually they will say this is too much work and liability for the money (I'd hate to be the one that charged $25.00 which cost me $196,000) which will end up with a shortage of abstractors and a sharp increase in pricing - it's called supply and demand. 

to post a reply: login - or - register


Re: Online services - Lisa Ramsey/TX
11/11/2004 5:04:34 PM (3995 views)
Re: Online services - Donna Grady/NC
11/11/2004 8:44:14 PM (3982 views)
Re: Online services - Lisa Ramsey/TX
11/11/2004 9:21:03 PM (4030 views)
Re: Online services - Judy Nisonger/CA
11/12/2004 4:55:29 AM (3961 views)
Re: Online services - Donna Grady/NC
11/13/2004 10:28:21 AM (3983 views)


<< get older messagesget newer messages >>

DISCLAIMER: These Message Forums are un-moderated and Source of Title does not endorse the content of any of the posts. Source of Title discourages libelous comments and you, as the sole creator of the content, take full responsibility for your remarks.
Directory

The Source of Title Business directory has 8961 listed companies.

Leave feedback on a company:
SOT ID #:  learn more...
DRN Title Search
Blogs

Read other users' blogs-- or start your own!

Most Recent Blog Posts:

Shared Driveway Agreements
Marissa Berends's Blog
2025/12/10
0 comments

Explain It Like I’m 5: FIRPTA Edition
Marissa Berends's Blog
2025/12/03
0 comments

Home buyers are more active this fall.....
Michael Stelzer's Blog
2025/11/27
0 comments

Articles

Source of Title articles help to keep you informed on the state of the title industry.

December Jobs Report Commentary from MBA's Mike Fratantoni
“The pace of employment growth slowed in December to 50,000, in line with the average pace of 49,000 for all of 20...
MISMO Publishes SMART Doc V3 Power of Attorney Specification
“The new SMART Doc V3 Power of Attorney Specification extends the benefits of verifiable, tamper-evident data to a...
Mortgage Applications Decreased Over a Two-Week Period in Latest MBA Weekly Survey
“Mortgage rates started the New Year with a decline to 6.25 percent, the lowest level since September 2024. Refina...
MBA Launches Mortgage Banking Bound at Louisiana State University
“Offering Mortgage Banking Bound at LSU represents another significant milestone for the program and will further ...
Kriss Law/Atlantic Closing & Escrow Finalizes Merger With Pino Law Offices
"This is the latest example of our commitment to sustainably expanding our resources and capabilities throughout norther...

Search Articles:
browse...

Classifieds

Buy, sell, or trade! Browse the ads or post your own!

Looking for Abstractors in SD 12/27
December 27 2025
Hello, I have the following orders in SD in the following counties: Buffalo(3), Charles Mix(1),Codington(1), Dewey(9), Lyman(1) Oglala Lokota(4), Pennington(1), Roberts(4), and Todd(2). This is a total of 26 orders. I am doing consistent business inn...[more info]

email
© 2020, Source of Title.