Carteret Title
DRN Title Search
Register
Log In
Forget your Password?

Home
Directory
Bulletins
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Links
Classifieds
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
FAQ
Privacy Policy


Source of Title Blog

Is Notice by Certified Mail Worth the Cost?
by Robert Franco | 2017/04/03 |

Certified mail is the most common form of notice required by law. It is intended to provide some assurance that notice is actually provided by getting the recipients signature acknowledging receipt.  But, is it really all that effective? More importantly, is it really worth the cost?  The Ohio legislature seems to believe that there is a better way to provide notice in some circumstances.

Source of Title Blog ::

Ohio House Bill 34 would allow some state agencies, local governments, certain board and commissions to send required notices by regular mail and e-mail, instead of certified mail, in several scenarios.  For example, a county board of revision is required to notify a complainant and the applicable property owner of the time and place of a hearing for a complaint concerning property valuation.  Under H.B. 34 the board of revision must make the notification "by either certified mail or, if the board has record of an internet identifier of record associated with the owner, by ordinary mail and by that internet identifier of record."

The bill defines "internet identifier of record" as "an electronic mail address, or any other designation used for self-identification or routing in internet communication or posting, provided for the purpose of receiving communication." 

The Ohio Township Association supports HB 34, stating that its members "can attest that notification requirements can be extremely costly."  It calls the option for regular mail and e-mail "a common sense approach to public notification requirements."

According to the bill's Fiscal Note & Local Impact Statement, Cuyahoga County estimates that approximately 85% of all required certified mail deliveries are returned unclaimed or undeliverable in a typical year.  At an average cost of $5.00 per mailing to the county, the cost of these unclaimed or undeliverable items adds up to an estimated $500,000 annually.  With so many certified mailings returned it would seem to be a pretty inefficient and costly manner of service.  

Generally, the purpose of such notice is to afford a person "due process" before depriving him of property.  This due process requires notice "reasonably calculated under the circumstances" to apprise the person of the hearing affording him the opportunity to be heard.  It could be argued that regular mail and e-mail is more likely to provide actual notice to recipients today.  Too many people don't claim certified mail because they are too busy, or they just don't want any more bad news.  How many times have you received good news via certified mail?

For now, the alternative form of delivery in this bill would have limited application to 29 various situations where the government is sending the notice. But, if this works, might we see this as an acceptable means of service generally?   

BH 34 passed the House unanimously and is currently pending before the Senate Government Oversight and Reform Committee.  




Rating: 

Categories: Ohio Legislation

673 words | 1510 views | 1 comments | log in or register to post a comment


Mail Notice

it is my understanding that many situations under federal law require notice by registered mail in order to be recognized in court.  

maybe it should all go to process servers & private delivery couriers;  revive the private economy for the small guy (or gal) 

 
by William Pattison | 2017/04/11 | log in or register to post a reply
Source of Title Blog

Robert A. FrancoThe focus of this blog will be on sharing my thoughts and concerns related to the small title agents and abstractors. The industry has changed dramatically over the past ten years and I believe that we are just seeing the beginning. As the evolution continues, what will become of the many small independent title professionals who have long been the cornerstone of the industry?

Robert A. Franco
SOURCE OF TITLE

 

Links

Recommended Blogs Recommended Posts Source of Title Services
Recent Comments

I am Abstractor/searcher working from, we have experienced in many US states and counties from onli...
by Chethan Kailash C
I have done Richland and Lexington Counties many times and I agree.  My gripe is I have seen ou...
by Naomi Backes
You're a good man, my friend.  I have worked for many lawyers in the past and it is too easy to...
by Alix Ott
I concur with the general sentiment that the advancement in information technology will likely make ...
by Don (Chunshen) Li
Posting from personal experience... The title company I work for has had 2 instances within th...
by Richard Palen
A couple of thoughts about this.  Massachusetts has had computerized indexing since the 1980's ...
by Leigh Attridge
I like the idea of GIMP as well as the new program in Tennessee.  I can definitely see the oppo...
by Laura Johnston
When the closing was set, the title company should have transmitted wire instructions on a company f...
by James Newberry
Categories

 
© 2007, Source of Title.