Carteret Title
DRN Title Search
Register
Log In
Forget your Password?

Home
Directory
Bulletins
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Links
Classifieds
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
FAQ
Privacy Policy


Source of Title Blog

Re/Max Sues First American
by Robert Franco | 2008/04/21 |

According to a Denver Post article, Re/Max Suit Sparked State Probe, Re/Max is suing First American for $1.35 million for violating the terms of a marketing contract.  First American made the first payment of $660,000, then terminated the contract citing a clause that allows it to be cancelled if "legal or regulatory action alleging a violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act is taken." The lawsuit alleges that no RESPA violation had been alleged when First American decided to terminate the contract... but that could be coming.  Erin Toll, the director of the Colorado Division of Real Estate, was anonymously sent a copy of the lawsuit.  Toll was formerly the Colorado deputy insurance commissioner who's similar investigation resulted in at least a dozen kickback cases settled by the Department of Housing and Urban Development in 2005. 

Source of Title Blog ::

Apparently, the marketing contract required Re/Max to promote and advertise First American as the "exclusive Re/Max supplier for title services" in all brochures, catalogs, convention materials and other print media wherever Re/Max promotes other exclusive suppliers.  If Re/Max is referring orders to First American in return for payment of the "marketing fee," that would certainly seem to be a violation of RESPA. However, Re/Max senior vice president and general counsel, Geoff Lewis said that Re/Max International is a franchisor, not a brokerage firm, so the marketing contract is legal.

"We sell franchises that are independently owned and operated to local real estate brokerages. We're not engaged in the real estate business," Lewis said. "We're very comfortable with the agreement, or we wouldn't have filed the suit to enforce it."

To me, this claim seems to be absurd. Re/Max is claiming that under the contract they are required to advertise First American as their exclusive supplier of title services, but because the franchises they sell are independently owned and operated they can't actually require their brokers to make First American an exclusive provider.  So what exactly is the point of the marketing agreement?  There must have been some understanding between the companies that this would translate into orders for First American - so isn't that a RESPA violation?

My impression is that with all of the scrutiny the industry is under for paying illegal kickbacks, someone at First American came to their senses with respect to these marketing contracts and decided to pull the plug before they got caught.  Obviously, if First American cited the clause in the contract allowing them to terminate the agreement if there was an alleged RESPA violation, they believed that agreement would not withstand HUD scrutiny ... and I agree. 

Re/Max, on the other hand, decided to waive a big red flag, screaming "look at us, we violated RESPA," when they filed the lawsuit.  They just couldn't leave well enough alone.  They made $660,000, but they got greedy and wanted the rest.  Now they might just get more than they bargained for... they might get to play the leading role in the next big HUD investigation. They have tipped off the regulators to something that may have otherwise gone unnoticed. 

Either Re/Max was charging First American to advertise them as something that they had no authority to actually do - make them an exclusive supplier of title services - or they violated RESPA.  That is not a good position to be in, in my opinion.  Regardless, there is clearly something not quite Kosher going on with this marketing contract and the regulators are now aware of it. 

Robert A. Franco
SOURCE OF TITLE
rfranco@sourceoftitle.com




Rating: 

Categories: RESPA

824 words | 4241 views | 1 comments | log in or register to post a comment


As The Perceptive Robert Franco Would Say...

Don't sign illegal contracts involving kickbacks.

But if you dooooooo....

Don't file suit to eforce it.

But if you doooooo...

 
by Patrick Scott | 2008/04/22 | log in or register to post a reply
Source of Title Blog

Robert A. FrancoThe focus of this blog will be on sharing my thoughts and concerns related to the small title agents and abstractors. The industry has changed dramatically over the past ten years and I believe that we are just seeing the beginning. As the evolution continues, what will become of the many small independent title professionals who have long been the cornerstone of the industry?

Robert A. Franco
SOURCE OF TITLE

 

Links

Recommended Blogs Recommended Posts Source of Title Services
Recent Comments

 Thank you for the reminder to check for that notation about homestead exemption ending on the ...
by stephen willard
Pat was one of the sweetest men I've ever had the pleasure of knowing.  At every conference he ...
by Douglas Gallant
Pat was a good friend and a critical part of NALTEA.  So many memories from the NALTEA conferen...
by Jay Duncan
Pat was a good friend.  I have many wonderful memories, having known him. for 13 years,  ...
by Wanda Steudel
I have done Richland and Lexington Counties many times and I agree.  My gripe is I have seen ou...
by Naomi Backes
You're a good man, my friend.  I have worked for many lawyers in the past and it is too easy to...
by Alix Ott
I concur with the general sentiment that the advancement in information technology will likely make ...
by Don (Chunshen) Li
Posting from personal experience... The title company I work for has had 2 instances within th...
by Richard Palen
Categories

 
© 2007, Source of Title.