Carteret Title
DRN Title Search
Register
Log In
Forget your Password?

Home
Directory
Bulletins
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Links
Classifieds
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
FAQ
Privacy Policy


Source of Title Blog

The North Jersey Practice
by Robert Franco | 2009/08/06 |

When the buyers hire their attorney to represent them in a real estate purchase and he absconds with their money, who is liable for the loss?  According to the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey, the title company is on the hook.  The Court refers to this as an illustration of the "north Jersey practice."  Perhaps it's time for title insurers in north Jersey to rethink their closing procedures. 

Source of Title Blog ::

The Goodmans were purchasing a home in Somerset.  They hired their neighbor, attorney Richard Pizzi, to represent them in the sale of their old home and the purchase of the new one.  When the old home sold, the Goodmans instructed Pizzi to deposit part of the proceeds, $293,308.47, into his attorney trust account for the purpose of closing on the purchase.  Pizzi later told them that they needed to deposit an additional $20,000, which was not the case. 

Pizzi then requested Atlantic Title, an agent of Stewart Title, to issue title insurance. The request stated "This is a cash deal... this is a super rush!" Atlantic provided a title commitment showing Pizzi as the applicant and the Goodmans as the purchasers.  

After the closing, the checks issued by Pizzi from this trust account bounced and it was determined that he had stolen at least $277,717.00 of the Goodmans' funds. He was later disbarred.

The Goodmans filed a claim on their title insurance policy but Stewart Title denied it. Because the claim was denied, the New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection paid the Goodmans for their losses and sued Stewart to recoup their payout.  Stewart's position was that Pizzi was the Goodmans' attorney, thus acting as their agent, and it sent him a notice that disclaimed liability for his his misdeeds.

THE ATTORNEY RETAINED BY YOU, OR BY YOUR LENDER, CLOSING OR SETTLING THIS TITLE IS NOT AN AGENT FOR AND DOES NOT ACT ON BEHALF OF FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY [sic]. THE COMPANY ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY LOSS, COST OR EXPENSE INCURRED BY YOU BECAUSE YOUR ATTORNEY OR YOUR LENDER'S ATTORNEY HAS MADE A MISTAKE OR MISAPPLIED YOUR FUNDS. Because the attorney is not our agent, we assume no responsibility for any information, advise [sic] or title insurance promise the attorney may give or make. Our only liability to you is under the terms of the Commitment, Policy and Closing Service Letter if you choose to obtain one.

[The reference to First American was an error and probably should have been to Stewart Title.]

The theory was that because Pizzi was the Goodmans' attorney, any notice he received was imputed to the Goodmans, despite the fact that he apparently failed to pass it along to them.

The title commitment also contained the following note purporting to limit the insurer's liability:

The Policy will insure you against certain risks to the land title, subject to the limitations shown in the Policy." The cover sheet also stated in bold capital letters: "You should read the commitment very carefully. . . . If you have any questions about the Commitment, contact the local office issuing this commitment.

But, this is where the "north Jersey practice" come into play. 

In north Jersey, title-insurance carriers do not use their own employees or 'title agents' to supervise real-estate-title closings. They rely, instead, on the attorney for the purchaser, whom they must approve, to perform the functions of the title agent. The buyer's attorney in north Jersey acts as the representative of, and performs the functions for, the title insurer in the same way as does the title agent in south Jersey. All communication with title-insurance companies with respect to the purchaser are directed to the purchaser's attorney. The buyer's attorney will accept the deed and necessary title and closing documents from the seller. He or she will remove all exceptions to the title according to the title commitment. The buyer's attorney disburses all moneys; he or she will withhold a portion of the purchase price to satisfy outstanding liens and, with respect to any existing mortgage, obtain the mortgage-payoff statement, transmit the appropriate funds to the mortgagee, and receive the canceled mortgage for recording. The attorney will authorize the issuance of title insurance. 

The appeals court, relying on established precedent, held that defalcation committed by the buyer's attorney remains a risk covered under the title insurance policy, unless the title insurer notifies its insured directly that the policy does not cover such risk. It found that Atlantic Title failed to take the steps necessary to inform the Goodmans directly that the title policy they were buying did not cover the risk of Pizzi's defalcation. Atlantic Title's practice to include the disclaimer statement in an insurance commitment binder that is sent only to the buyer's attorney, does not sever, as a matter of law, the agency relationship between the carrier and the attorney.

But, there was another issue... one of timing. The trial court held for Stewart Title finding that Pizzi had misappropriated the funds before he had any contract with Atlantic Title.  Thus, at the time of the theft, there could not have been any agency relationship between Stewart and Pizzi and they could not be held liable for his actions. The trial court said that to impose liability under these circumstances was "inequitable and unfair and inappropriate in law."

The appeals court, on the other hand, found that the Pizzi's defalcation may have begun before the creation of the agency relationship, but it continued, unabated, after it was clearly established. It held that the harm caused by Pizzi to his clients cannot be isolated to any discrete act and the title insurer is liable because the chain of defalcation continued long after the agency relationship was created.

I have two observations: one regarding the north Jersey practice, and the other of the law.  First, who is the brainchild behind this absurd practice of delegating the entire closing and escrow function to an attorney with what seems to be an obvious conflict of interest? I do believe that it is a good idea to have attorney representation for real estate transactions. (See generally, my blog "A Simple Transaction.")  And, I do believe that in some situations an attorney can wear multiple hats and handle a dual representation scenario.  However, in this instance, it appears that the Goodmans hired Pizzi to represent them and it does not appear that he was a regular agent for Stewart Title.  If he had been an agent for Stewart Title and this was known to the Goodmans, and they signed an appropriate waiver, I think such dual agency can work. But in such a case, I would expect the insurer to remain liable for his acts. 

Second, as a matter of law, I believe that the closing and escrow functions should be considered a non-delegable duty. If a title agent does delegate those fundamental duties, the agent should remain liable.  But, since the law does not recognize this as a non-delegable duty, I would have to agree with the trial court in this matter.  Not because of any disclaimers that were provided to Pizzi - if they didn't directly notify the Goodmans, Stewart should be liable... if not for the timing of Pizzi's theft.

Nothing that Pizzi did after the agency relationship was created caused any loss to the Goodmans, at least not that I can see.  Even if Stewart, or Atlantic Title, had provided written notice to the Goodmans immediately upon the formation of their relationship with Pizzi that they would not be liable for his misdeeds, the money was apparently already gone. And, because the Goodmans were already under contract to purchase the home, they probably couldn't not have even backed out of the deal without incurring further losses.

According to an article on Law.com, Stewart intends to appeal.

Stewart Title's attorney, Jaimee Katz Sussner, of Herrick Feinstein in Newark, said she intends to appeal the ruling, which she says "constitutes a significant departure from settled law -- not only as it pertains to insurance coverage, but also as it will undoubtedly affect previously settled notions of agency law and vicarious liability.

"Through this decision, the Appellate Division has stated, for the first time, that a principal may be liable for the acts of an agent before the principal-agent relationship was created, or even before the principal and agent met, as was the case here," Sussner said. "There is no question that this decision will have broad implications in a number of areas that the court did not likely intend. We strongly believe that this ruling was incorrect on many levels and will be overturned."

I think that Sussner is probably right and I would expect a reversal on appeal. There are some quirks with the north Jersey practice and I would agree with the general rule that, in these situations, the title insurer is liable if it fails to directly notify the buyers that it is not liable for their attorney's defalcation.  However, because the theft took place before the agency relationship was created, it is "inequitable, unfair, and inappropriate" to hold the insurer liable, as the trial court pointed out.

Robert A. Franco
SOURCE OF TITLE




Rating: 

Categories: Attorneys, Defalcations, Escrow/Funding, Risk, Liability and Claims, Title Problems

2218 words | 2921 views | 7 comments | log in or register to post a comment


Ah yes, I can see it now....

Dear Purchasers Attorney: 

Thank you for your request for a title commitment for the purchase of property located at 1234 Residential Street.  We are pleased that you have chosen ABCXYZ North Jersey Agency for your title needs.

Kindly furnish us with the telephone number of your clients, Mr. & Mrs. Home Byer, so that we may contact them directly to warn them that if you should steal their funds, this will not be covered by their owners policy.

Again, thank you for choosing ABCXYZ North Agency.

Very truly yours,

XXX

 

 

 

 
by Shelley Raichelson | 2009/08/06 | log in or register to post a reply

Protecting Their Own

Do you think the appellate decision would have been different if the New Jersey Lawyer Client Fund hadn't taken the loss?  This is likely a fund that the judges have to pay into as part of their bar membership dues.  I hate to be pessimistic, but maybe they were looking for a "deep pocket" other than their own to foot the bill on this one.

 
by J. H. | 2009/08/06 | log in or register to post a reply

Good points...

Shelley: You probably aren't too far off.  In Ohio, we have to have our customers sign a form that says we offered them closing protection coverage if they want our underwriter to cover such mishandling of escrow funds.  The conversation basically goes something like:

ME: This form is to let you know that our underwriter offers closing protection coverage in the event that your escrow funds are mishandled and there isn't enough money in the account for the payoffs and proceeds checks to clear.  If you would like the coverage there is an additional fee of $50.

CUSTOMER: So, I have to pay you $50 more in case you steal my money?

ME: Ummm... yeah, that's pretty much what it boils down to. It is sad that it is necessary, but Ohio law requires it.

In this case, however, it does make a little bit of sense, since the buyer chose the attorney who would be handling their escrow funds.

J.H.:  You make a very good point about the Fund and its source of funds. I think there probably is some tendency to want to make the big insurance company pay for the loss. But, I think the court here missed the mark in doing so. The Goodmans selected Mr. Pizzi and he stole the funds before the title company got involved. I think the law and common sense are on Stewart's side in this instance. Seems like the appeals court stretched the law a bit too far, to me.

 
by Robert Franco | 2009/08/07 | log in or register to post a reply

Love the Blog!

Hello,

I love your blog!  It's great to read about what's going on in other markets.

Mike Rubin

http://titleinsurancethoughts.blogspot.com/

 
by Michael Rubin | 2009/08/07 | log in or register to post a reply

CSL

In NJ, closing service letters are only for the lender's benefit; they haven't extended it to owners yet.  PA is about to.  At our last NJ CE class our underwriter was suggesting to our North Jersey title insurance colleagues to start acting more like South Jersey title companies and taking over more functions such as document recording and helping them get used to the new HUD1 forms coming in January.  It's been cases like this one, and others such as failing to record documents that have been running up the claims for the underwriters, and those culprits tend to be lawyers, not title producers.

I hope the court overturns this decision.  I bet the producer and the underwriter were not even paid for the insurance. There is a much older court decision dealing with any kind of insurance in that there is no coverage, when it hasn't been paid for.   If your lawyer had failed to pay your car insurance for you or your health insurance, and you were in an accident, the insurance company would deny your claim.  Surely that should apply to title insurance as well.

 
by Jeff Land | 2009/08/10 | log in or register to post a reply

DETAILS, DETAILS, DETAILS

Sorry if this was covered already but i dont have time to browse every response at this time. I just want to share some details about North Jersey with you.

Closing Protection letters are supposed to be issued by the agent. They cover approved attorneys. Every time an agent is working with a new attorney they are supposed to get the attorney approved by their underwriter so that the closing will be insured. http://www.firstam.com/faf/pdf/jmurray/jm-insured.pdf 

Even though the title Co denied the claim, that does not mean that they will win in Court as may be seen.

Attorneys are allowed an extra degree of trust bestowed upon them because they are agents of the Courts. They are held to strict standards of ethics concerning the public trust. Most attorneys will never stray outside of those bounds of strict ethics. Of course, being human they are also subject to temptations and the weakest amoungst them could be subject to failure. That is why the Public Trust Protection Fund was set up and restored the buyers loss.

 

 
by D L | 2009/08/20 | log in or register to post a reply

Massachusetts practice not too different (except for the theft)

Massachusetts title practice is to use attorneys exclusively as title agents.  Some lenders have "closed panels" of attorneys; other lenders allow any attorney to close for them upon presentation of a closing protection letter from the title insurer.  In either case, the lender's attorney conducts the closing and acts as title agent for the insurer.

Massachusetts attorneys are allowed to represent both the buyer and the lender at the closing, as long as any conflict of interest is disclosed.  While there may be a potential for conflict in some situations, in general my experience is that the buyer is better served by having his own lawyer conduct the closing than to work with a lender-assigned lawyer who may not be as attentive to issues that do not rise to the level of title defects.

And yes, we have had a few cases of lawyers who have stolen escrow funds -- but thankfully, only a few.  Massachusetts also has a "good funds" statute that forbids closing attorneys to record any instruments until the incoming funds have cleared the attorney's account.

 
by Donald Solomon | 2010/04/07 | log in or register to post a reply
Source of Title Blog

Robert A. FrancoThe focus of this blog will be on sharing my thoughts and concerns related to the small title agents and abstractors. The industry has changed dramatically over the past ten years and I believe that we are just seeing the beginning. As the evolution continues, what will become of the many small independent title professionals who have long been the cornerstone of the industry?

Robert A. Franco
SOURCE OF TITLE

 

Links

Recommended Blogs Recommended Posts Source of Title Services
Recent Comments

The Title Insurance Rating Bureau of Pennsylvania (TIRBOP) has obtained authorization from the Pen...
by Jeffrey Land
In this case divorce did not terminate dower rights....if you read ohio dower law you will learn tha...
by Diane Kessler
Honorable Sir, We are a team, located in Peshawar, Pakistan, we are expertise in Title Searches (Cu...
by Mansoor Ahmad
Thank you Robert A. Franco. I have been searching for about 35 years and love my job but I thought...
by Barbara Thorpe
In Ohio, once you are divorced, you no longer have a dower interest.   ...
by Robert Franco
In my research I was led to this blog and am asking for leads to legal representation on my case.&nb...
by Diane Kessler
The error in the legal description is what is not material, which in this case, I agree. Theref...
by john gault
The Court didn't really change the standard or law for reformation.  What the Court was sa...
by Robert Franco
Categories

 
© 2007, Source of Title.