Doc Signers
DRN Title Search
Log In
Forget your Password?

About Us
Contact Us
Privacy Policy

Source of Title Blog

We Need New Policies or Laws for Computer Indexing
by Robert Franco | 2012/08/14 |

I had the pleasure of attending the Ohio Association of Independent Title Agent's conference yesterday.  The OAITA is a great organization and they provided some excellent discussion at this year's conference.  One particular speaker gave me an opportunity to ask a question that has been on my mind for quite some time; the speaker was Rick Campbell, President of the Ohio Recorders Association and Stark County Recorder.  I asked him if there was a state-wide policy of noting in the index when corrections were made.

Source of Title Blog ::

This is a particularly important issue for title abstractors.  Although the indexing procedures are very strong - sometimes requiring two different people to index the same document - mistakes still happen.  While some recorders make notations in the index when they make corrections, others do not.  This means that if you get that dreaded call that you "missed something," when you recheck the records you may not be able to tell that there was a change.  You, and your client, will wonder how on Earth you missed it.  You could end up facing a claim on your Errors and Omissions policy for something that was not really your fault.

This was never a problem with the book indices because changes made in ink were always plainly obvious.  Now the change is electronic, there may not be any apparent record that anything was ever different from what now appears in the index.  Mr. Campbell understood why this was a concern, but he said there was no official policy on how to handle this issue among the recorders.  He said that the recorders are bound to follow the Ohio Revised Code and that the Recorders Association cannot tell recorders what to do.  As he explained it, each recorder is responsible for following the law with guidance from their county prosecutor.

As abstractors we want the index corrected when mistakes are found - it is important to maintain the integrity of the public records.  However, with no real system in place to protect abstractors when the index is changed, many are hesitant to point out indexing errors when they find them. 

The solution seems simple enough, a notation in the public index should be required whenever a change is made.  But the Ohio Revised Code does not address procedures for correcting mistakes in the index.  Perhaps it should.

Mr. Campbell noted that the Recorders Association was working on updating the laws relating to county recorders - simple things like making the statutes gender-neutral and changing the outdated references to "alphabetical index," to account for electronic indexing.  This might be a good opportunity for someone to lobby for changes to create a proper procedure for notating changes made to correct indexing errors.

We all know that mistakes happen and this really isn't about casting blame, but more accurately preventing an innocent party from being held liable when changes are made. To use a buzz-word we are all familiar with, it is about transparency.

There were many more interesting topics discussed at the OAITA conference.  They provided 3 hours of CE/CLE credits on Escrow Accounting Practices and Procedures, Ohio Real Property Case Law Update, and Identifying Mortgage Fraud.  There was also an interesting presentation on Ohio Notary Requirements for Real Estate Transactions.  It was a very informative conference and I'm glad I went - "thank you" to the OAITA for putting the event together!




Categories: Abstractors, Ohio Legislation, Opportunities, Public Officials, Public Records

803 words | 7543 views | 1 comments | log in or register to post a comment

Version Control
It seems they should have something like version control similar to what is used in computer programming, such as on GitHub. Any time a file of any kind is updated there are notes associated with the update along with a timestamp. The original file is also retained in an archived state. If an indexing issue ever arose, you could easily follow the timeline of that file to determine whether it was an indexing error since corrected, or that you actually missed the document in your search. 
by Jason Green | 2014/09/26 | log in or register to post a reply
Source of Title Blog

Robert A. FrancoThe focus of this blog will be on sharing my thoughts and concerns related to the small title agents and abstractors. The industry has changed dramatically over the past ten years and I believe that we are just seeing the beginning. As the evolution continues, what will become of the many small independent title professionals who have long been the cornerstone of the industry?

Robert A. Franco



Recommended Blogs Recommended Posts Source of Title Services
Recent Comments

I think there is a problem with doing this. R.C. 5302.23(B)(6) states as follows:"A fee simple title...
by Keith Barton
Appreciate the update Robert. I am curious if there was any discussion of GIS and Parcel IDs. I was ...
by Jeanine Johnson
I am looking for someone in CA to help...
by Kathy Stewart
I am not independent, but I am a title abstractor for a small law firm in NC that deals with Real Es...
by Ashley Bonds
I've thought further of who will be affected by block chain and it won't just be lawyers, title sear...
by Carol Clark
I recently attempted to have a title company examiner sign and notarize (acknowledgement of her sign...
 Thank you for the reminder to check for that notation about homestead exemption ending on the ...
by stephen willard
Pat was one of the sweetest men I've ever had the pleasure of knowing.  At every conference he ...
by Douglas Gallant

© 2020, Source of Title.